Friday, September 28, 2018

A Tale of Two Sessions

You Guys Stink at Foursomes.

Tom Watson, Saturday Evening, 2014 Ryder Cup
Wouldn't it be ironic if Watson turns out to be right about everything?  OK, no reason to be that pessimistic, but there's an outside chance that it really is the twelve players, and not the pods.

After a good morning, the U.S. Team allegedly showed up for the afternoon alternate shot and comedy ensued.  Or was it tragedy?  Regardless, it was quite the travesty....

Here were the scores:
3 & 2
4 & 3
5 & 4
5 & 4
Let's not mince words, it was a beatdown.... It took a furious comeback by Phil and Bryson to claw their way back within 5 holes, and not a single match reached the 17th tee....

No doubt you heard this factoid cited on the broadcast:
We’ll let history be the guide. Since the event’s inception, there have been nine previous instances of 4-0 sessions. The U.S. first swept foursomes in 1947 (when there was only
one session of those matches). They turned the trick again in 1963, ’75, ’81 and most recently in the opening session of the 2016 Cup at Hazeltine. There have also been four 4-0 sweeps in fourballs, two for the U.S. (1967 and ’71) and two for Europe (1987 and ’89). 
Now, the big-picture question: Has a team ever lost a session 4-0 and gone on to win the Cup? 
No. Nope. Never.
So, you're saying there's a chance?

We'll keep our powder dry on Phil (don't fret, it'll be just a second), and deal with our other hero:
All through that back nine on Friday, Woods really didn’t look like himself. For one
thing, he was wearing team-issued white pants. You never see him wearing white pants. Then, as he stood on the 14th tee, waiting to play fourth and last, he was breathing through his open mouth. You never see him breathing through his open mouth.

It’s understandable. After the year he’s had — all the press conferences, the autographs, the text messages, the post-round ice baths, the mornings on the range after dropping his kids off at school, the grinding-it-out in hot weather in an all-out effort to reclaim a place in the game — it’s more than understandable. 
His tee shot on the par-3 downhill, over-a-pond 16th might have been a shocker, but it’s not when you see it through the prism of exhaustion. The Europeans, still one up, had the honor. The pin was tucked, front right, about 15 feet over a bulkhead. Kid Tommy played first and did his job: hole high, left and safe, maybe 25 feet from the hole. Molinari followed with nearly the same shot. They’d have two chances but that’s all they had and that’s all they needed. Then came Reed and he did his job, his ball finishing about 15 feet below the hole. He gave Tiger a green light. Now it was showtime. Tiger time. 
It looked like Woods was trying to hit a cut shot into the wind but the swing had no speed to it and the ball landed not with a thud but a plop. Suddenly, he was a bystander.
But is it possible that we should be more worried about Tiger's partner?  Not a single top ten since his Masters win and it seems the dry cleaner shrunk his Captain America uniform.

Anyone for some Jordan?  He made everything early in his morning match, though cooled off and let his somewhat-good-at-golf partner cover things.  Here was John Huggan's explanation of the logic of the pairing from last night:
The break-up of Jordan Spieth and Patrick Reed isn’t so surprising now that Justin Thomas is on the U.S. team. As Spieth points out, he and Thomas are close friends who
have been playing together since their early days in junior golf. 
“It’s going to be really exciting to be able to look at him on the first tee and kind of remember where we've come from, and we’re both here,” said Spieth, who was 4-1-2 with Reed in the previous two Ryder Cups but clearly got physically worn down by playing with the American firebrand, which showed in his weak singles efforts in the Ryder Cup and Presidents Cup.
And it worked.... Until it didn't.  That's the thing we all need to keep in mind, as well as the difference in the formats.  I pretty much understood why Thomas Bjorn had each of his eight guys out there for the afternoon session, but I wish I could say the came about Captain Furyk.

But wouldn't we feel far better about Jordan if he rode the pine in the afternoon?  He missed those two short ones, and once that starts we all have white knuckles.

So... Phil?  I feel a tinge of sympathy for the man, because he had no business being out there in foursomes,and, that's not Furyk's only mistake.  If he was going to be there, he should have been teeing off on the even-numbered holes....  

If the Americans lose, the video of Phil on the third tee should run on an endless loop.   Such was his confidence that he hit and iron off the tee of a Par-5, but he pulled said iron into the water.  Geez....  I don't even know what to think of Bryson's sorry day, he just seems to have drawn the short straw.

But, there's no reason to be shy about, my idea of pairing Phil and Bubba in foursomes and strategically sacrificing the point might have saved the day.  Why do they continue to ignore me?

So, has Cap'n Jim learned anything?  Apparently not, because here are your fourball pairings for zero dark thirty tomorrow:
Match 1: McIlroy/Garcia vs. Koepka/Finau 
Match 2: Casey/Hatton vs. Johnson/Fowler 
Match 3: Molinari/Fleetwood vs. Woods/Reed 
Match 4: Poulter/Rahm vs. Thomas/Spieth
Which leaves us with the same obvious question as yesterday?  Will Phil and Bubba play in the afternoon foursomes?  And, if he benches Phil, did Furyk pack his kevlar?

 He did change the order of the matches, and I wonder if he's up on Tiger's history with Italians in this event?
Oh, this Frankie Molinari — he’s got Tiger’s number! 
It was on July 1 that the Italian won Tiger’s tournament in Washington, by eight. (Shouldn’t Tiger win Tiger’s tournament, named for an American mortgage company, on a steamy summer day in D.C.? And, if not Tiger, at least some other American?) 
Then, a couple weeks later, Molinari flat-out stole that British Open from right under Tiger’s Niked cap. And let’s not even dwell on the weirdness of the Woods-Molinari halved singles match that ended the day, and sealed an American loss, six long years ago, at the 2012 Ryder Cup at Medinah. Just Google “Tiger Woods” and “concession” if you need a refresher on that whole thing.
Don't forget his listless loss to Constantino Rocca in his first Ryder Cup in 1997.

It looks like Jim might have moved Tiger and Patrick to the third slot to get away from the Juggernaut Fleetwood-Molinari team, only to be stymied.

So, what to expect tomorrow morning at TPC - SAINT-QUENTIN-EN-YVELINES?  You'd have to expect a U.S. bounceback, as they have their eight best out there and the format is more familiar.  On the other hand, today's fourball matches were far tighter, and that lead could easily be attributed to Tony Finau's extremely fortunate bounce on No. 16.  

But, as noted above, what's Jim got in mind for the afternoon?  Because putting Phil out there again would be, as they say about second marriages, the triumph of hope over experience.

Tomorrow is our anniversary, and the bride and I are going to try to play in the afternoon.  Assuming, of course, that Fairview opens for play, which it hasn't all week.  Therefore, I expect that I'll next see you on Monday morning for our traditional wrappage.

Thursday, September 27, 2018

We Have Your Pairings....

And they're more than a little strange.

Here are your Friday a.m. fourball matches:
RYDER CUP PAIRINGS, TEE TIMES (ET) 
FRIDAY MORNING FOURBALLS 
2:10 a.m. ET: Brooks Koepka and Tony Finau vs. Justin Rose and Jon Rahm 
2:25 a.m. ET: Dustin Johnson and Rickie Fowler vs. Rory McIlroy and Thorbjorn Olesen 
2:40 a.m. ET: Justin Thomas and Jordan Spieth vs. Paul Casey and Tyrrell Hatton 
2:55 a.m. ET: Tiger Woods and Patrick Reed vs. Francesco Molinari and Tommy Fleetwood
Furyk has Phil, Bubba, Bryson and Webb sitting, the last two of those not requiring comment.  Both guys profile better for foursomes, especially Bryson.

I assume that everybody will play at least once each day, and I just don't see how it makes sense to play Phil and Bubba in alternate shot.  Especially with both players struggling recently, let them get their bearings with a partner to help.

In fact, the only way this makes sense is if he's going to spring an all-southpaw pairing in the afternoon, as a way of strategically conceding a point.  Haven't seen that tried previously, but it sounds like something Phil would come up with when he's in "Smartest guy on the planet" mode.

In terms of the Euros, it's mostly who I expected to see though not necessarily paired as I might have thought.  The biggest surprise is Casey, who would seem to be tailor made for alternate shot.  Not Like Molinari, but I expect the Italian to play all five sessions (or at least four at a minimum).

Bjorn is sitting Stenson, Sergio, Poulter (a surprise indeed) and Noren.  Those guys should be nails in alternate shot, to the extent that they have anything to offer (as relates to Sergio and Henrik), though I'm very surprised that Poulter and Noren aren't out there.  The first session sets the tone, and isn't that why Poults is there?

Golf.com also helpfully provides this schedule of the afternoon foursomes matches:
FRIDAY AFTERNOON FOURSOMES 
7:50 a.m. ET: TBD and TBD vs. TBD and TBD 
8:05 a.m. ET: TBD and TBD vs. TBD and TBD 
8:20 a.m. ET: TBD and TBD vs. TBD and TBD 
8:35 a.m. ET: TBD and TBD vs. TBD and TBD
Thanks, guys, that's very helpful.  I think we ca all agree that that third match looks to be especially intriguing. 

Erev Ryder Cup

One more day of waiting, not helped in the slightest by being unable to play due to our heavy rains....  with a heavy thunderstorm last night, not sure it will be any different today.

The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations - This seems premature at best:
Le Golf National to earn honor of best Ryder Cup venue of our time
Second place is two weeks in Philadelphia....

No doubt you'll be as surprised as I as to the author, but we should let him make his case:
Le Golf National will be the best Ryder Cup venue of our lifetimes.
To be clear, the Old Course at St. Andrews and a hundred other tournament venues are
better works of golf architecture. Le Golf National, raved about by the Euros after they lowered the Ryder Cup venue bar for decades, is a fantastic arena for an event that traditionally overmatches the mediocre host venues. 
On both sides of the Atlantic, the Ryder Cup rarely goes to the places that could play a subversive supporting role. Even with silly rough and excessive narrowness off the tee, Le Golf National will turn in that nuanced performance the Academy voters adore. It’ll pop in for key jokes and cruel hoaxes just often enough. Couple this venue with two stout teams, and the combination should take this Ryder Cup from classic status to how-will-we-ever-top-that.
It helps that it's Paris, but the fun of Geoff's piece is in the dishonor roll:
Granted, the venue bar in Europe is not high, with most of Europe’s modern-era Ryder Cup venues having been chosen for financial reasons and never for their architectural or spectating merit. 
The Belfry was a 17-hole snoozefest with one weird drivable par 4, while The K Club, Celtic Manor and Gleneagles were blurs of soggy inland tedium that no one needs to revisit.
Geoff does make the excellent point that all of those artificial mounds make much sense given that for two days there are only four groups on the course at a time.  

There was a related but in Alan Shipnuck's mailbag that fits here:
What is your favorite Ryder cup venue and why? Where would you like to see the Ryder Cup played in future years? #AskAlan -Mark (@cottonmc) 
Honestly, the venue isn’t that big a deal. In stroke play the playing field is paramount, because each competitor is playing the course. In match play you’re just trying to beat the other, so as long as the venue has lots of built-in risk-reward it will do just fine. Of course I’d love to see a Ryder Cup on a classic, strategic links (St. Andrews!) or a non-stop stress-fest that pushes them to the breaking point (Kiawah redux!). But, blessedly, the Cup is the one big-time event at which we don’t have to invest too much emotion in the course, because it’s a secondary concern.
Both guys make an important point, that the linkage between architectural merit and a satisfying competition is, at best, imperfect.  Can anyone say Bellerive?

But my greater concern is the U.S. Team's ability to adapt to the specific demands of this track.  

Thanks For The Head Fake - Captain Furyk had this yesterday on that Tiger-Phil pairing:
The speculation began before Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson were even selected as
captain’s picks for the 2018 U.S. Ryder Cup team. Would we see the two legendary veterans team up for a match at Le Golf National? Probably not, according to U.S. captain Jim Furyk. 
Facing reporters on Wednesday in his pre-Ryder Cup press conference, Furyk said a Tiger-Phil pairing this week was “probably not too likely,” but still left a door open to the possibility.
“I guess nothing’s out of the realm. They did play some golf yesterday. I think they both mentioned it would be a lot better pairing than it was in the past… You know, I won’t ever say it wouldn’t happen, but it’s probably not too likely.”
Talk about setting the bar low....

Amusingly, Golf Channel spent some time revisiting that infamous 2004 pairing, and it's even worse than I remembered.  First, Hal Sutton's dogmatic insistence on the brilliance of his move is just scary, as most of us instinctively realize that making two guys that hated each other play together entailed certain risks....  And lest you be oblivious to that, watching them stay no less than twenty feet apart on the first tee might have affected someone less clueless....

But there were two additional Phil actions that week that I had lost down the memory hole.  To wit:

  1. Phil practiced by himself off-site that Thursday, and;
  2. Phil switched from Titleist to Callaway equipment that very week.
As I have come to understand the world, thanks to Phil's patient explanation in September 2014, Americans cannot play well unless they are organized into pods.  But Phil's off doing his own thing, so at least one pod will be short-handed.

How were his teammates supposed to feel about that new and untried equipment?  Gee, it's hard to see why Ted Bishop thought they could use a stronger hand at the till...  But this is the guy to whom we've handed the keys.....  Of course, Sutton earns bonus points in taking a guy that didn't know his own equipment and making him play Tiger's higher-spinning ball.  

Today In Fake Golf News - I know math is hard, but still....  First is this from Golf magazine:

All 11 of Tiger Woods’s Ryder Cup partnerships, ranked from best to worst
Countered by this from Golf Digest:
RYDER CUP 2018: A RANKING OF TIGER WOODS' 12 PREVIOUS RYDER CUP PARTNERS
 Well, which is it, guys?  

Interestingly, the guy in last place per the latter is the missing link in the former:

12: Paul Azinger
Record: 0-1-0 
Summary: Although he'd garner acclaim as a winning Ryder Cup captain in 2008, in 2002 Paul Azinger probably shouldn't have been on the team. The final of two captain's picks by Curtis Strange, Azinger was just 22nd on the points list, 51st in the Official World Ranking, and nearly three years removed from his final PGA Tour win. Azinger and Woods lost, 1 down, to Darren Clarke and Thomas Bjorn in the opening match of the event, and Strange didn't partner them again. Sadly, we also never got to see who "The Podfather" Azinger would have put Woods with at Valhalla in 2008. Maybe this never-ending game of musical chairs could have been settled once and for all.
Golf Digest also reminds of the curious fact that Tigers early pairings seemed to be of the well-past-their-prime ilk, including Lehman, Calc and Duval, in addition to Zinger.

But this is crazy:

8: Phil Mickelson
Record: 0-2-0 
Summary: You're probably saying, How is Mickelson not ranked the lowest? That pairing with Tiger was a complete disaster! But it really wasn't that bad. Wait, hear us out! Sure, Hal Sutton's move to pair his best two players backfired with two Friday losses at Oakland Hills in 2004, but both were close to strong European pairs (A 2-and-1 loss to Colin Montgomerie and Padraig Harrington in four-ball and a 1-down loss to Darren Clarke and Lee Westwood in foursomes). And keep in mind that Mickelson had just switched to playing Callaway equipment. Had they played together at a different Ryder Cup, things could have been different! Who knows, maybe they would have become buddies a lot sooner, and we'd be watching the 10th anniversary of THE MATCH this Thanksgiving. That being said, pairing them again in Paris 14 years later would be a bold strategy.
On what planet is 0-1-0 worse than 0-2-0?  But the more important point is that Genius Hal took his two best players and set them up to fail, so "It was close" doesn't compute...

Both agree on the best pairing, a guy who just happens to be featured this week.  But the killer fact is that the best pairing only produced a 2-2 record, which is all we need to know.

Bob Harig covers this topic as well, including how it all began:
It started out well enough. At Woods' first Ryder Cup, at Valderrama in Spain in 1997, he was paired with buddy Mark O'Meara. It seemed the perfect team. Woods and O'Meara
knew each other well. They defeated Colin Montgomerieand Bernhard Langer 3 and 2 in fourball. 
And it was the last time Woods had a winning record at the Ryder Cup. 
He didn't win another match in Spain, and lost singles to Costantino Rocca in a 14½ to 13½ U.S. defeat. It was the last time he lost at singles, going 4-0-2 in his past six Ryder Cup final-day matches.
Harig goes in the expected direction, and who among us isn't curious as to the who and the how well this time around.  But it's the small details that interest me, such as this from Calc:
This became a problem in the alternate-shot format (foursomes) because Woods' partner would then be required to play shots with an unfamiliar golf ball, one that was tailored to his skills. 
"Tiger wasn't about to use his partner's ball,'' said Calcavecchia, who played one match with Woods and lost at the 2002 Ryder Cup. "I actually didn't think it would be a problem. The Nike ball he was using back then was made by Bridgestone and I was fine with that. 
"But I remember a couple of instances where I hit iron shots in alternate shot and I flushed a shot and thought it was plenty of club and it would come up short. That ball he used all those years went nowhere. It spun a lot and went nowhere. It was hard for guys to get used to that in one match. I never understood why he didn't just use a Titleist, and it would be easier for his partner. Let's face it, Tiger could play anything. But sure, that had some influence on his partners.''
It was an issue, and most of us thought he was hurting himself with his equipment choices.  But how about this from captain Curtis:
"He was tremendous on the team,'' 2002 captain Curtis Strange said. "He was the first in line to do anything. He was the first one to sign the memorabilia we had to sign, all 200 things we had to sign. He was terrific. And he was a great teammate. And after [playing for] me, he became a little more of a spokesman. Back then he led more by example and he was still young. But he has done it the last couple of times, and especially as an assistant captain. He was tremendous.''
Your first memory is that he was great at signing stuff?  Curtis, you might be a tad confused as to priorities here....

Pairings, Schmairings -  Shane Ryan has a thoughtful piece on a certain captain's toughest challenge:
Ryder Cup 2018: Jim Furyk's greatest challenge will be letting his stars down easy
He means by that, the act of sitting them down....  Shane's piece is far better than last night's Golf Channel discussion, in which they seemed to not recognize that different formats are used.

It's always seemed to me that, regardless of which format is played when, that pairings should be worked backwards from the foursomes pairings....  That's the unusual and unusually demanding format, and anyone that's not suited for fourball probably isn't on your team in the first place.

Shane premises his piece on the poor recent performances of Phil, Bubba, Reed and Jordan, though I do believe he overthinks things:
This puts the stress squarely on Furyk's shoulders. Assuming he's trying to avoid playing
his four coldest players in afternoon foursomes, it leaves two choices: He can either play Bubba, Phil, Spieth, and Reed in the morning, or sit them out for an entire day. 
He can't sit them for an entire day. It's just not plausible, even if it's arguably the smarter move on paper. As such, you can expect to see all four golfers on Friday morning. Judging by the Tuesday practice groups, Furyk may be planning to break up the band and have Spieth and Reed play with different partners—it may be that Spieth doesn't want to play with him anymore, considering the "interesting" comments Reed has made this year, from the denied drop at Bay Hill ("I guess my name needs to be Jordan Spieth") to the trash talk at the WGC-Match Play ("my back still hurts" from carrying Spieth at the Ryder Cup), all of which preceded Reed beating a frustrated Spieth at that WGC. Or maybe they're completely fine. In any case, it's easy to imagine Furyk seeing the benefit in giving himself other options if the two aren't playing well on Friday morning.
Those four guys will all be in the lineup Friday morning, because it's fourballs.  It's the most forgiving strategy, and all four can be birdie machines.   Tony Finau is the other guy that needs to be out there....  I wasn't over the moon about that pick, but you don't pick him to sit in the format that best suits his game.

To me, this is the test of Fyryk's captaincy, does he have the authority and the cujones to manage the team as needed.  Phil and Tiger should play three sessions, though I'm open to perhaps a fourth for Tiger.  That's both a function of their age, but also the recognition that Phil isn't well-suited to alternate shot.

Tiger is a more complicated case, as it depends on whether you believe that the guy who hit all those fairways at East Lake will show up in Paris.  If so, a pairing with Bryson in foursomes could work, with Tiger taking the even holes with the three one-shotters.
When it comes to the other three, Furyk's job gets tough. How do you manage those extremely large personalities? How do you disappoint them, in service of winning, and not risk a PR nightmare inside and outside the team room? 
The answer comes down to personal management, of course, and there's no way for anyone besides Jim Furyk to know exactly what notes to sing. Yet it's an incredibly vital part of his job.
The Watson lesson I believe is misunderstood.  He created his problem when he caved on Friday afternoon and played them in foursomes.  The way you handle is to make sure each player understands their role, and don't surprise them.  As to whether Captain Jim is up to that task, we'll know when we see the Friday afternoon pairings.

Others Musings - On the one hand, they forgot Zinger...  But Golf Magazine had the good sense to allow Mike Bamberger and Alan Shipnuck to riff on the event, and they honed in like a laser on the important stuff:
ALAN SHIPNUCK: Michael, how should we begin? 
MICHAEL BAMBERGER: How about a tough question first: How many assistant captains on the European team can you name? 
SHIPNUCK: Well, let’s see. Harrington. Westwood. McDowell. Luke Donald… 
BAMBERGER: That’s a murderer’s row right there when you think about it. 
SHIPNUCK: If they were gonna play the assistants against the assistants, I like Europe’s chances for sure. 
BAMBERGER: That’s how the tiebreaker works. Is that not accurate? 
SHIPNUCK: That will be my next, slightly less controversial column.
As I said, the important stuff....

Alan had this on that Shane Ryan issue above:
SHIPNUCK: That’s a great point. And that’s where Tiger and Phil as de facto assistant captains really helps the U.S. side. Because given Tiger’s back and the fact that he must be emotionally exhausted after East Lake, and given Phil’s age and poor form coming in, I feel like they probably will each only play three matches. If the two greatest players of the last quarter century are okay sitting, how can Justin Thomas or anyone else complain about it? Europe has all these rookies so none of them have a claim on playing every match, though I would expect Rahm and Fleetwood will wind up doing so. It’s become a joke how many vice captains there are but a big part of their job is babysitting the players who get benched by keeping their spirits up and helping them practice and prepare for when it is their turn. So, you touched on Tiger and Phil. They loom so large in this Ryder Cup. This could easily be Phil’s final one as a player. For Tiger, this puts an exclamation point on his comeback. What are you expecting from them?
This is a bit long, but it's a good back-and-forth on Alan's famous column and the nature of the event:
BAMBERGER: Emotion is a big part of the Ryder Cup. Do you think the results are an aggregate of the talent or is there more to it than that? 
SHIPNUCK: Take the Presidents Cup – it’s purely an aggregation of talent. The U.S. has significantly better players and they win by a significant margin, simple as that. For the first 50 or 60 years of the Ryder Cup, it was the same thing: The Americans were better players, they won every time, and that was that. And then this new generation came through: Seve, Faldo, Lyle, Langer, Woosnam. They had these studs who were not only Hall of Fame talents but the Ryder Cup was how they defined themselves. It was how the European golf community defined itself. And it was how the European Tour managed to stay afloat financially. It was how these players made their bones before the World Ranking had any currency, really. The Ryder Cup just became the be-all, end-all to that generation of European players, and fans, and writers. And because it meant so much to them there was this unexplainable alchemy, a magical process by which a David Gilford, or a Peter Baker, or a Iganacio Garrido somehow played the best golf of their life that week. And that helped always carry the day for Europe. Some of those U.S. teams that lost Ryder Cups in the 2000s and even up to 2014, top to bottom as measured by World Ranking points, number of tournament victories or any other metric, they were demonstrably stronger teams. But they just didn’t have that magic. They didn’t have that chemistry. Azinger talked about this a lot – the Euros have always had a natural pod system by nationality, with various guys bonded together because they came up together and shared a specific language and heritage. Now add all to this the fact that the old U.S. team were at a significant disadvantage structurally. Each American captain was this lone ranger who came in and did it his own way. There was no collaboration with his predecessor. There was no continuity. It took the Task Force to adopt the European model where you groom vice captains to become captains and from one administration to the next there’s a lot of communication and collaboration. That’s what Europe was doing for 30 years. So you take the chemistry between the players and the superior leadership and that’s how they were able to outperform the U.S. time after time. Now, the U.S. is no longer at a structural disadvantage. The young, chummy American players now travel together and hang out the way the guys on the European Tour always have. So the European Ryder Cup team’s built-in advantages have all been neutralized. And as we saw in 2016, the U.S. had better players. I think they have better players this year. And because they have the continuity and the structure now, I think they’re going to dominate in the short- and long-term. 
BAMBERGER: Well, that is an extremely believable answer. That answer was so thorough you may have turned me around on this subject. I’ve always struggled with this idea of the Ryder Cup chemistry, because ultimately the ball is just sitting there and you have to play the shots and I don’t know how any pep talk trumps cold, hard skill. But Ignacio Garrido! I haven’t thought of that name in 20 years. And it’s true, there were times when Seve was leading him around the course by the shoulders and he seemed to force Garrido to do things he didn’t know he was capable of. It is an extremely interesting topic.
Good stuff!

It's upon us, but I have no clue as to whether I'll have the time and inclination for some interim blogging.  It's a rather unforgiving schedule, and I expect that when I awake tomorrow morning I'll go straight to the DVR.   

It should be epic.

Wednesday, September 26, 2018

Midweek Ryder Cup Musings

So, any golf to watch this weekend?  

An Edifice Complex - Usually the province of politicians, there's a Ryder Cup arms race under way:
Until it hosts 6,000 fans and bellows like the Superdome, the first tee grandstand at the Ryder Cup is bound to be under-appreciated. Just wait a couple days. 
On a peaceful Tuesday afternoon, only a handful of people sprinkled the navy blue seats. Two women chatted in the sun. A handful of marshals shot the breeze in the breeze. A worker zip-tied wires to a pole. Down on ground level, Rory McIlroy rode by in the back of a golf cart. On first sight that day, the grandstand towered over the 4-time major-winner. Later on, he’d admit it gave him goosebumps. 
By now, you’ve likely seen the behemoth. Maybe it gave you goosebumps, too. Ever since the first digital rendering of it was shared in early March, the ultra stadium seating is all anyone wanted to see. It’s all they want to take pictures of. It’s all they want to talk about. 
“I looked up and felt like I kept looking up and up and up,” Patrick Reed said Tuesday. “There’s going to be so many people that are sitting in there. It’s going to be an unbelievable atmosphere.”

When they tell us that theirs is bigger than ours, I guess we'll have to agree:
Max capacity is 6,800, which is about five times the total at Hazeltine two years ago, and nearly three times the total at Gleneagles in 2014. The biggest problem might actually be filling it. Here at the most hyped event of the year and perhaps the most hyped Ryder Cup of all-time, it’s certainly a risk worth taking. 
Youtube search: Ryder Cup first tee. You’ll find countless videos of the past three cups — Bubba Watson and Ian Poulter raising the roof at Medinah, the dewy and boisterous sunrise at Gleneagles and the “I BELIEVE THAT WE WILL WIN” echos at Hazeltine.
It would be mildly amusing if it's only half-filled, though you know how golf-crazy those Frogs can be:


In Other Important News... - The Forecaddie has been an invaluable source of insight in our little world, most recently with details on the course set-up.  Today he addresses an issue of great national importance:
When The Forecaddie ventures to France, he expects to get questions about wine, cheese and how many croissants have been consumed. Instead, the No. 1 question from folks back home? 
Is Paulina there?
So....is she?
Since The Man Out Front would like to get on with important things such as speculating on Ryder Cup pairings or dreaming of tonight’s meal in this wondrous land of food and
vino, here is what we know: Paulina Gretzky has been seen here in Paris and appears to be enjoying croissants at her hotel as any rational human being would. Although she might want to turn up the thermostat in her room since an Instagram story listed the temp at a brisk 51 degrees. 
The intrigue surrounding her presence is somewhat understandable since the model and mother of two children with Dustin Johnson recently deleted all Instagram traces of her man. This led to speculation she might sit out this year’s Ryder Cup, dashing the spirit of wife-and-girlfriend watchers. 
Bookmakers even aggressively suggested they did not expect her to make the trip, offering +180 (9/5) odds if you believed she would be present at Thursday’s opening ceremony. While she still could take a rain check on the festivities and prove the bookies right, The Forecaddie has heard that Paulina boarded the PGA of America Team USA charter and has been enjoying the early week team festivities.
But who knew there were joint WAG activities?   I'll put our WAGs up against theirs any day of the week....

Here's the funny part, at least to me.  Back after the 2017 Masters, a friend of the blog with good sources informed me that it wasn't socks on the staircase, but rather that Paulina caught the notorious hound in flagrante delicto.  Time passed and, contra the jet-ski bit, everyone seemed to buy the staircase story.

Last Saturday I'm out with some fine fellows in our faux Ryder Cup event, and the mere mention of DJ brings out this story yet again.  When I noted that I had heard the rumors, it was asserted that it's way more than a rumor...  I don't actually know what happened, but many seem alarmingly ready to assume the worst about our DJ.

What Passes For News - Our hero Phil is on record that he can't perform without pods, so pods there will be:
SAINT-QUENTIN-EN-YVELINES, France — The U.S. Ryder Cup team already knows 
this week’s pairings. But everyone else is eager to find out more. So when Tiger Woods teed off in Tuesday’s practice round alongside Phil Mickelson, Bryson DeChambeau and Patrick Reed, it sparked intrigue as to this week’s potential teammates. 
“They are very aware of who they will be playing with this week,” captain Jim Furyk said Tuesday morning. “They are very aware of some of the options they have, and they will work on that a lot in the team room and they will work on that a lot in the next couple days.” 
Still, he suggested fans and media stay away from drawing conclusions from Tuesday’s groups.
That's kinda rich, Jim.  Besides Paulina, what else do we have to talk about?  You know sending them together will draw speculation, but you promised us you'd behave:
Over the summer, U.S. Ryder Cup captain Jim Furyk was asked on the Golf Channel if he’d consider pairing Tiger Woods with Phil Mickelson, should they both make the
Ryder Cup team. He laughed it off. 
“I hope they’re both watching, because they just fell off the couch laughing,” he said at the time. “I wouldn’t guess that would be a good idea as a captain, I’m just saying.”
It was more than a guess, but while has me worried...
But Mickelson wasn’t laughing when he answered a question on the same potential pairing on Tuesday. Well, he wasn’t laughing right away, at least. “I think we would both welcome it,” he said, then repeated himself. “I think we would both welcome it.”
This has me closer to apoplectic:
Rumors were swirling that Mickelson was testing a Bridgestone ball at last week’s Tour Championship, which would indicate prepping for a pairing with Woods or DeChambeau. Will either come to fruition? We’ll know by Saturday afternoon.
Egads!  I've seen this refernced in three different items, and they all buried the lede.  Forget the pairing, the only reason for him to practice with another golf ball is that he might play in foursomes....  And that belongs on the Mount Rushmore of bad ideas.....

Oh, and in another buried lede, Spieth and Reed were in different pods yesterday.   I'm not shocked by that, as fault lines have presented themselves in their relationship since Hazeltine.  Most notably Patrick's comment about his back still hurting form that partnership....

Pairings, By The Numbers - Richie Hunt, a golf stats guru with whom I am unfamiliar, comes up with stats-driven pairings for your consideration:
The Reed-Spieth partnership that torched Europeans in 2016 didn’t reveal itself as a top
pairing in Hunt’s model. Reed is more of a scrambler, and Jordan more of a ball-striker who has struggled this season with putts inside 10 feet. Not a great combination in 2018. 
“Outside of Seve and Olazabal, trying to get that one pairing that plays well all the time is kind of a pipe dream,” Hunt says. 
Webb Simpson and Phil Mickelson was another U.S. alternate-shot partnership that Hunt’s model ranked lowly. 
“Mickelson misses a lot of fairways and Simpson is not good out of the rough,” Hunt says. “That’s kind of a disaster pairing.”
 no surprises there, as Spieth-Reed was always more about attitude, though no one remembers that we have the disgraced Tom Watson to thank for that pairing.  But the Mickelson-Simpson pairing isn't about the pairing, as they both profile poorly for alternate shot.  For a short hitter, Webb doesn't hit too many fairways, and short-and-wrong is bad everywhere.

The pairings are all about foursomes, as it matters far less in better ball:
Bryson DeChambeau-Tiger Woods 
“Both have excelled in approach shots from the fairway and Bryson is good out of the rough, which would help cover for Tiger’s inaccuracy off the tee.” 
Key stats: DeChambeau 15th in Rough Proximity; Woods 135th Driving Accuracy
And this looks even better if you factor in Tiger's late season improvement in driving stats.  Also, one assumes Tiger would tee off on the even number holes, which includes three of the one-shotters.
Webb Simpson-Rickie Fowler 
“Webb Simpson is a player better suited to alternate shot. He struggles out of the rough so would need to be paired with a player who hits a lot of fairways. Rickie Fowler would be compatible.” 
Key stats: Simpson 159th in Rough Proximity; Fowler 54th in Driving Accuracy
I don't know about this, especially how Furyk plans on using Webb this week.  But I have to believe that Rickie will be an important guy in both foursomes sessions, because who else does he have?

As for those other guys:
Justin Rose-Tommy Fleetwood 
“Two excellent ball-strikers. They both really hit the driver well, deadly accurate, would be tough for the U.S. team.” 
Key stats: Rose 13th SG: Off-the-Tee, 5th in SG: Tee-to-Green; Fleetwood 16th SG: Off-the-Tee, 13th SG: Tee-to-Green 
Jon Rahm-Ian Poulter 
“One of best Ryder Cup pairings in my model. Poulter’s iron play has been above average this season.” 
Key stats: Rahm 5th SG: Off-the-Tee; Poulter 25th SG: Approach
I expect that those first two will play all five sessions, though not necessarily together.  But Rahm is a guy that doesn't profile great for alternate shot, or in general at this venue with its tight corridors.  

Stat So? - Alex Myers goes for Shock and Awe with his thirteen Ryder Cup facts.  While he comes up considerably short of that goal, I'm not an easy man to shock....  But there are some worthwhile nuggets:
6: Tiger Woods has had 12 partners in seven Ryder Cup appearances, compiling a disappointing 9-16-1 record. But the inability to find Tiger a consistent teammate goes even deeper with Woods playing just one match with six of those 12 golfers. The only one-off he won with? Chris Riley in 2004.

Fortunately that was old Tiger...  he was a tough guy to pair, especially in alternate shot because he used a higher spin ball than the other guys.  Also because he seemed not that into it....

And we of course love the old-time inconsequential stuff:
6-0: We said "at least seven Ryder Cup matches" when mentioning Gardner Dickinson's sparkling career record because if you cut that number to six, then it's impossible to top Jimmy Demaret, who went a perfect 6-0 from 1947 to 1951.

We love the old timey stuff....

Does He? - John Feinstein has one of his long thumbsuckers about the Reed-Rory match, including how it came about.  But is this correct?:


Given Rory's trying Sundays all year, notably with Patrick at Augusta but also with Tiger at East Lake, perhaps he'd like to take his chances with.... I don't know, Phil?  Webb?

Elsewhere, Alan Shipnuck's mailbag wasn't as Ryder Cup-centric as I expected, but he did have this:
On a scale of 1-10 how disappointing was Rory’s performance? -Peter (@pkeen52) 
If 1 is a Dustin Johnson shrug and 10 is Rory forlornly burying his head in his arm in Amen Corner circa 2011, I’m going with a million. Beyond the wild driving, loose irons and shaky putting, what was so disturbing was the utter lack of fight McIlroy displayed. Playing with his boyhood idol, with the entire world watching, he had packed it in before reaching the turn. Rory has always reveled in being old-school but it’s time for a full-blown intervention with a sports psychologist, to say nothing of a yogi and shaman.
I thought it strange when he showed up on the first tee with a sheet of Forever stamps, but what a desultory performance it was.  If I'm Thomas Bjorn, I'd be more than a little concerned, not that there's all that much he can actually do....  Though I think I'd try to keep him away from Patrick to the extent possible.

Since You Mentioned Shipnuck.... - Other topical bits from the man that predicted an era of U.S. dominance:
The only thing that could top what happened at East Lake would be Tiger/ Poults in the last pairing of the Ryder Cup as the deciding match. Am I right???? -@fakePOULTER 
You are right. It would be redundant for Tiger to dust Rory or Rose, theoretically Europe’s two best players, since he just did that. Poults is a different kettle of fish. Tiger is better than him at every single facet of the game but you know that Poulter would fight to the death. Could he summon enough of his old Ryder Cup magic to actually steal a win? If we get the chance to find out it will be riveting theater.
Hmmm.... Tiger-Rory?  Tiger-Rose, a ball-striking clinic....  Or, you know, Tiger Sergio?  I'm not sure the Era of Good Feelings extends quite THAT far....

How about a Tiger-Molinari rematch?  It's more than passing curious how Tiger got a pass for the finish of that final match at Medinah, when he should have been able to get them a halve.  I know, it had to be crazy out there, but still...
#AskAlan #Rydercup Who are your dream singles matches? -@DougSeaberg 
Reed-Rahm (dueling volcanos), Jordan-Rory (fire and ice), Koepka-Fleetwood (U.S. Open rematch, two years running), Phil-Sergio (lions in winter), DJ-Rose (ballstriking Jessies), Bubba-Hatton (emotionally unstable mega-talents).
Meh!  Spieth-McIlroy would be interesting, but more because both guys have played so poorly on Sundays that they should consider observing the Sabbath.
Why do you NOT send out Tiger and Phil as the first pair out on Friday morning? -@JonKrause77 
Hell yeah, let’s do it. Let’s blow the doors off this Cup! That probably mean sacrificing Tiger and Bryon in alternate shot that afternoon but so what? They can reprise that pairing on Saturday. Sending out Tiger and Phil first would put a huge charge into this event. It’s what the world is clamoring for, and sometimes you gotta give the people what they want, strategy be damned.
And what happens when they lose 6&5?  Seriously, given Phil's form in recent months, why would Tiger take on that charity case?  Others seem to agree:
Ryder Cup 2018: Phil Mickelson asks for a stroke a side from Tiger Woods, Patrick Reed tells him it's not enough
They're under a little pressure, as poor play could reduce demand for their pay-per-view boondoggle, and interesting subtext for the coming week.

And this:
In the history of the Ryder Cup, has there ever been a more potential game-changing captain’s pick than Tiger? #AskAlan -Ben (@Konocomm) 
Yes, Curtis Strange at Oak Hill. Oh, you meant game-changing in a *positive* way? It remains to be seen how much Tiger has left in the tank – he has to be emotionally exhausted after the win and physically run-down after months of non-stop golf at the end of a taxing season. I’d be very surprised if he plays more than three matches. But as far as bringing mojo/juice/buzz, there’s never been and never will be another captain’s pick like this one.
I do like both parts of how Alan handled it.  Always good to be reminded of the risks captains take with their picks, Sergio being very much in the mode of Lanny choosing Curtis.  But Tiger has played a lot of intense golf the last few months, and we've seen other guys have a letdown in the aftermath of a big win.

I'd be surprised if he doesn't play well, but not shocked....

An Appeal to Authority - Brandel Chamblee remains a hoot, the prefect remedy for the interminable waiting period until Friday.  His current premise is that the U.S. team might have too many cooks in the kitchen, a theme I've come at from a different premise.  But his appeal to authority is simply priceless:
The research suggests that while leaders are very good at learning how to influence others, they are less likely to learn how to follow. As a result, when groups of leaders get together they may have difficulty in coordinating their activity. 
University of Texas professor Paul Woodruff, a classics scholar whose knowledge of the ancient world and military background influence his classes on leadership, often lectures about the problems that occurred as far back as recorded history among groups and armies when there were too many leaders. It is necessary, he argues, especially in this era where the assumption is that everyone should strive to be a leader, that leaders also know when to follow to optimize the potential of a group. 
Professor Woodruff often makes the analogy that today’s business world is not unlike the story in Greek mythology where Agamemnon struggled for years with how to best manage the Greek heroes Achilles, Ajax and Odysseus, who fought for him against the Trojan army. Is it merely a coincidence that Odysseus finally conceived of the Trojan horse and the Greeks defeated the Trojans, after Achilles and Ajax had died? 
As Professor Woodruff would say, there is only one corner office and only one No. 1.
I've long though that Agamemnon can teach us much about Phil and Tiger....  If only Hal Sutton had read up on his Greek mythology.  Or, you know, read anything....

Put differently, is Furyk really in charge and able to do that which needs to be done?  If so, Phil will play the fourballs but sit in alternate shot.  But it's hard to say no to the guy that got you your job...  

Stay tuned....


Tuesday, September 25, 2018

We'll Always Have Paris

The Eagle has landed.... We'll be in full cliche mode for the next few days, so you've been forewarned.

These Guys Don't Fly Coach - This photo of the Yanks arriving in Paris answers quite a few questions:


How could you do that to poor Tabitha?  But I was glad to see that Jordan made it to Atlanta to catch the flight, and apparently Rose and the other Euros weren't offered a ride.  Hey, let 'em grab an Uber, this is war!

The Captains - Upon arrival, the American players were given a juice box and their blankies, and sent off to bed....  The only event of note was a captains presser, which tended towards the insignificant, though Captain Furyk couldn't help but note the big win Sunday:
With the Ryder Cup displayed in front of the two captains, Furyk looked only mildly weary following the overnight flight. He said the buzz of a particular Sunday victory had
everyone in good spirits. 
“We were waiting yesterday, we had a major victory for the team and we had a whole group of guys waiting in the team room, and then a giant roar when Steve Stricker walked in the room after his victory last night,” Furyk said of his vice captain. “It was fun to see Strick play well on the Champions Tour in South Dakota and obviously Tiger played so well at the Tour Championship, and to grab ahold of the golf tournament early and fend everyone off, I think was a good buzz in the team room.”
Yeah, that win by Strick electrified the golf world.... I'm just hoping it doesn't over-shadow the events of the coming week.

As for the bigger concerns, nothing to see here:
As for Furyk’s most pressing concern – the lackluster Tour Championship play of Phil Mickelson, Brooks Koepka, Patrick Reed and Bubba Watson – the captain was ready with a response. 
“You know, the way I look at it is in my career, I’ve played very well in practice and had rough tournaments,” Furyk said. “I’ve had bad practice in some events and went on to win those same events. So last week is kind of behind us.”
And that list fails to include our Jordan, who at least had the presence of mind to ensure himself an additional week of rest.  

We've precious little to occupy ourselves with,  so let the lineup speculation begin:
The captains received several questions about gauging match pairings by practice-round play, with Bjorn sounding less interested than Furyk given the European team’s track record at Le Golf National. 
“In your mind, you’re very set on where you want to go with it, and something uncharacteristic has to happen if you’re going to change it, but you’re pretty much set in your mind where it’s all going to go,” Bjorn said.
This Alistair Tait profile of The Bjorn Enigma is surprising.... No, really:
Thomas Bjorn has a chance in Paris to change the way he’s remembered within the
game. Holding the Ryder Cup as victorious European captain could replace the other scene for which he might be remembered: taking three shots in a bunker on Royal St. George’s 16th hole that cost him a chance at major glory in the 2003 British Open. 
It’s a tribute to the Dane’s strength of character that he rebounded from his St. George’s letdown. But then we’re talking about one of the strongest characters the European Tour has ever seen. 
Eight of his 15 wins came post 2003. Fifteen wins – not bad for a guy who at 18 hoped “to win a tournament on the European Tour.”
Yeah, that was his one chance, and he spit the bit.  We always credit Europe with their "system" of choosing captains, yet they veer between their historical stalwarts and their role players, and Bjorn is very much in the latter category.

But this is the surprising part, at least to me:
“He’s very strong willed and will do things his way,” said Paul McGinley, the 2014 European Ryder Cup captain. “He’s used to dealing with players from his years as chairman. He’ll have no problem managing different personalities in the team room.” 
Age has tempered what was once a fiery disposition that earned Bjorn the nickname “Semtex,” after an explosive. His nostrils seemed permanently to breath fire in his early days on tour. 
“I’ve had my moments with people,” Bjorn said. “With me it’s five to 10 minutes in the heat of the moment and then I’m over it. I’m also good at getting back to people and getting it ironed out.”
Semtex?  Wow, who knew a Dane could run that hot?  

But this Ewan Murray interview with Bjorn from last week goes in a strange direction....  Though, to be fair, it's one prompted by the interviewer:
“I think sometimes what is forgotten, in the political discussion, is how great this continent is,” Bjørn says. “From all the way down in Greece, to Iceland, there are so many great countries and so much natural common ground. It is such a small continent compared to the others but together we have so much history and so many great things going for us. I think that is forgotten a little bit in the political picture.
Silly me, I didn't realize we were having a political discussion...My bad.  Iceland, for sure, but what did the Greeks ever contribute to Western civilization?  What?  OK, but that was just a bunch of dead white men..... Perhaps the more amazing bit is how he rambles on:
“It means a lot more to us as golfers because we grow up with the European Tour. The backbone of that tour is still our European events. It is part of the life we live. It has a meaning. 
“I think a lot of people in their everyday life have a hard time relating to what Europe is. Something that gets a little bit into people’s minds, in my opinion, is ‘What is Europe?’ and ‘What is the European Union?’ So you have Norway and Switzerland and soon to be the UK as part of Europe but not the EU. For some people that leads to ‘Who is what?’ and ‘What is what?’ 
“The identity of Europe in the Ryder Cup comes from the team; how they see themselves, through different countries, as Europe coming together. That, for me, is a thing the Ryder Cup does so well. It brings us together. You adapt an approach towards Europe, which you know is an essential part of what you do. When you get in that team room; you are in it for yourself, your country and your continent.”
 Curiously defensive, methinks....

Those who buy the party line about European comity should read this if only for the background of his rift with Ian Woosnam, which remains intact.  It's of some comfort to know that they can maintain their petty grievances as well as our guys can.  He's also a tad defensive about his picks:
“I think you’d have found if it was old pals there would be one or two others playing,” Bjørn says. “Some of the guys left out are very close to me and I was never scared of making tough decisions. Now, if people think I made these decisions on the back of them being pals then they don’t know me very well and that’s OK. That mostly comes from people who have no idea who I am, what I think and what I believe in.”
One might argue that there's no other lens through which to filter the Sergio pick, but that's for another day.  

Oh, and as relates to the kids and their damn phones:
SAINT-QUENTIN-EN-YVELINES, France – As social media has grown, so has the
propensity for athletes to post something regrettable. Even as Patrick Reed recently took to Twitter to gripe about free Red Sox tickets in the “line-drive section” of Fenway Park, U.S. captain Jim Furyk has no plans to order his players off of their phones. 
“During these events, I don’t see a lot of our players on their phones and on social media — they are such busy weeks,” Furyk said. “I don’t really have any policies, per se, other than you obviously want to keep everything straight and narrow, and I think social media is great when it’s fun. But past that, you know, I don’t really see any issues or concerns.” 
European captain Thomas Bjorn has no plans for a blackout, either. He sees social media now as part of an athlete’s life and image, especially the younger players.
Pretty cool dateline, no?

 The Course - Road games are tough, not least because the home team has full control of the venue:
There was no déjà vu for Justin Thomas and caddie Jimmy Johnson when they played Le Golf National’s Albatross Course for the first time during this year’s HNA French Open. 
The pair couldn’t think of an American course comparable to this year’s Ryder Cup venue. Thomas is only 25 and could perhaps be forgiven for not playing enough American courses. The same can’t be said for Johnson. The former Tour pro counts Nick Price, Charles Howell III, Adam Scott and Steve Stricker among players for whom he’s caddied over the past 21 years. He’s seen a few courses in his time. 
“We were trying to think of a golf course that this reminds us of in the States, and we had a hard time,” Thomas said. “There’s so many different variables this golf course has that make it so unique to a lot of the golf courses I’ve ever played. It’s very difficult to compare it to a course we’ve played in the States.”
Of course, JT was the only American to play in the event, at least of the twelve on the roster.  He also had this:
“It’s just a hard golf course,” he said. “It’s very narrow. You have to hit the fairways to have birdie chances into the greens.

“I knew right when I got here it was a very difficult golf course. I knew that you had to hit it in play. You can get it snowballing pretty quickly out here if you’re not careful.”
Thomas found that out in the opening round when he missed the fairway of the par-4 fifth with a 4-iron. His ball landed 2 yards from the edge of the fairway and kicked left into a horrible lie in deep rough. He made a double-bogey six. 
Even medium hitters don’t pull driver often around Le Golf National.
Also in France is Golfweek's Forecaddie, and he explains the set-up in more detail:
After a quick walk around Le Golf National, The Man Out Front can say the 2018 Ryder Cup venue is in sensational condition but is noticeably cruel to tee shots missing the
landing areas by more than 10 yards. The course features a lush cool season mix of grasses throughout, with a 3-yard wide transitional cut between fairway and 3-inch maintained rough in length, give or take a few strains of grass.

After the 10-yard wide transitional area of maintained rough — no picnic for even the strongest players– the rough turns downright nasty. Clearly cultivated to severely punish tee shots, expect to see some lost ball searches and hack-out shots at the many holes where water fronts the green complexes.
It's pretty clear that the American bombers will have to throttle it back and put a high premium on hitting fairways, though that will also apply to guys like Rory and Jon Rahm as well.  Phil, are you listening?

While the emphasis on tightness is appropriate, there's one further issue to watch in the three days of practice rounds:
“The old theory is tight and scruffy,” McDowell said. “They (U.S.) set it up wide with short semi-rough and middle-of-the-green pins. We always like to set it up a little tighter and a little tougher, and maybe not have the greens quite as fast.” 
Poulter endorses that theory. 
“The setup needs to be tight in our favor,” he said.
It's those slower greens to which I refer, and perhaps the guy to watch there is Tiger.  He's always struggled on slower greens, and I'd expect to see him struggle with the transition from East Lake.

You'll hear many comparisons of the course to Sawgrass, if only for the spectator-friendly mounding.  But you'll also hear much about the Loop of Doom, the closing four-hole stretch that will be where most matches are decided.  Captain Jim "Alas Poor" Furyk talks through the four holes with John Huggan, including this on the finisher:
18TH HOLE
471 yards / Par 4
4.51: Average in 2018 French Open
Most difficult 
I'm betting everyone in France is hoping a lot of matches make it to the 18th. It's a par 5
converted to a par 4, playing about 10 yards downhill. It's an uncomfortable tee shot, but you have to put the ball in the fairway. There's water all the way down the left, and there are bunkers on the right. You'd love to split those. I think guys standing on that tee are going to be as nervous as they've ever been in their entire careers. The key will be picking your spot/line and committing to it. Then hitting the ball to that spot without worrying about the periphery. That's all there is to it. [Laughs.] 
If you do get your ball in the fairway, you're left with a relatively large target. But the green is well-guarded and looks a lot smaller than it is. There's not a lot of room for a miss. But, as I said, it's a large green. So an aggressive swing and the smart shot will never be punished. That combination will win some matches. I can't imagine that par will ever be a bad score on this hole. But you never know. There's a lot going on, for sure. 
I've heard some say that the rough on this hole should not be too thick or deep, to encourage guys who have missed the fairway to still go for the green. But I can't imagine they'll set the course up as difficult as it was for the French Open, then cut away all the rough for the Ryder Cup.
Readers of a certain age might involuntarily shudder at the resemblance of this hole to the finisher at The Belfry, in which so many of our hopes met a watery grave.  

Don't Know Much About History.... - Ryan Herrington takes a stab at the most significant Ryder Cup moments beginning, strangely enough, at the beginning:
1927: Begin at the beginning
To get to where the Ryder Cup is today, the event had to get started. The inaugural match was played at Worcester (Mass.) Country Club in 1927 and was the culmination of six years of discussions regarding the viability of a competition pitting professionals from the United States against their peers from Great Britain. Twice before an unofficial version of the match was held, first in 1921 at Gleneagles in Scotland and then again in 1926 at Wentworth Golf Club in England. (Both times the Brits routed the Americans.) At Wentworth, Englishman Samuel Ryder and American Walter Hagen laid out the plans for a regular competition, the match moving back and forth across the Atlantic. Ryder commissioned a trophy for £250, and a tradition was born.
So, how many of these players could you identify?

The first victorious U.S. Ryder Cup team from 1927 (left to right): Al Waltrous, Bill Melhorn, Diegel Leo, F. Golden, Walter Hagen, Joe Pennoza, Gene Sarazen, Johnny Farrell, and Joe Turnesa.
 The first four matches were surprisingly competitive, but starting in 1935 the U.S. went on a tear.  

And this is a story most will not know:
Henry Cotton in that '47 installment.
1947: Surviving the war
With the matches postponed four times during World War II (1939, 1941, 1943 and 1945), that they would resume at all was not a foregone conclusion. And much of the credit for the fact that they did belongs Robert Hudson, an Oregon fruit grower and a member of the PGA Advisory Committee. Hudson helped secure Portland Golf Club as a venue and then paid for the British team, led by Sir Henry Cotton, to travel by boat (the Queen Mary) to the U.S. and then by train across country to Oregon. The hospitality ended there, as the Americans claimed a 11-1 victory.
 And this curious photo from Royal Birkdale in 1965:


That's a fleet of mini-mokes (don't ask me, I prefer my mokes to be full-sized) with scoreboards to be driven around the golf course be female amateur players.

Most folks remember Birkdale for the famous Nicklaus-Jacklin concession, but there are a couple of interesting notes about that.  First, notwithstanding that he had been dominating golf since 1962, that was Jack's first Ryder Cup appearance.  Why the delay?  Because he hadn't yet passed the PGA's course work, which he derided as being about learning to fold sweaters.  My point being that our dominance of the Ryder Cup in that era was accomplished with one hand tied behind our back.

Amusingly, while that is often cited as a great moment in sportsmanship, Jack took some heat:
But it wasn’t necessarily regarded so highly among everyone, demonstrating the competitiveness that was beginning to emanate from the match. “When it happened, all the boys thought it was ridiculous to give him that putt. We went over there to win, not to be good ol’ boys,” said American captain Sam Snead.
Tony would not have missed that putt, so no reason not to be gracious.... In fact, Tony can be credited along with Seve as later saving the event, so it all seems to have worked out.

I Saw It On TV - If you're surprised that David Duval has been brought back into the fold, and I was, you'll be even more surprised as to how it happened:
Two years ago at Hazeltine National in Chaska, Minn., Davis Love III found himself already losing a grip on his spirited U.S. Ryder Cup team. And it was only Wednesday. The American captain had issued explicit instructions to ignore news coverage of the
41st Ryder Cup, but there were his players crowded around the television watching a replay of Golf Channel’s studio program from the previous night. 
“I said, ‘Whoa, I told you guys not to pay attention to all the noise,’ ” Love recalls lecturing his players. “We were not going to watch the Golf Channel. But they were like, ‘Oh no, we’ve got to watch this.’ ” 
Word had filtered to team members about a fiery debate between analysts Brandel Chamblee and David Duval, and they wanted to see it for themselves. Chamblee had questioned the effectiveness of the putative leaders of the American side in recent years, Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson, and how their play had fallen short relative to great players from previous eras. Duval, who played in the 1999 and 2002 matches, countered with a perspective that separated him from his colleague by more than just opinion. “Having actually been out there and done it, there’s more to it than what these stats say. 
… The dynamic of the Ryder Cup comes into play in that regardless of who you are, there sometimes are forces more powerful going on, and it’s a very tangible thing.”
Love could sense that his players were eating it up. “The feeling was that David was defending us as a team,” he explained. And recognizing the impact Duval was having on them, Love sought an encore, asking the former World No. 1 to address the squad. 
“He comes in, tie untied, hanging around his neck, carrying his briefcase from the set,” Love said. “He launched into this very passionate speech, how playing in the Ryder Cup was one of the biggest accomplishments of his career. But it was more [about the fact that] the David Duval that they just saw defending them on TV had walked into the room and was still fired up. We asked him to come back and hang out with us every night.”
I guess he's the George Stephanopoulos of the golf media?  Yeah, he was defending them, but his argument seems to be, "Who ya gonna believe, me or your lyin' eyes?"  

The rest of the piece talks him up as a potential future captain, though the next few installments eem to be already spoken for.

In Search of a Viewing Strategy - It's a conundrum how to balance viewing and golf, as per this schedule:
Ryder Cup 2018: TV schedule
Broadcast schedule (all times Eastern) 
Thursday, September 27
10 a.m. - 1 p.m. Opening Ceremony | Golf Channel
Friday, September 28
2 a.m. - 1 p.m. | Golf Channel
8 p.m. - 12 a.m. (re-air) | Golf Channel 
Saturday, September 29
2 a.m. - 3 a.m. | Golf Channel
3 a.m. - 1 p.m. | NBC
1 p.m. - 6 p.m. (re-air) | NBC
8 p.m. - 12 a.m. (re-air) | Golf Channel 
Sunday, September 30
6 a.m. - 1 p.m. | NBC
8 p.m. - 12 a.m. (re-air) | Golf Channel
I have a game Sunday morning, so will likely walk directly from the 18th green to my car.  Note to self, go spikeless that day.

Friday and Saturday are more challenging, featuring an awkward combination of bad time slots and more golf than any one human can watch.  Interestingly, the Ryder Cup is the last holdout against the networks, as the obvious way to increase viewership would be to play one session on each of Thursday and Friday.  I suspect it's the Americans, with their deeper teams, that have resisted such an obvious change.

The question is, when I'm awakened by screaming cats at 5:30 Friday morning, do I turn on live TV to watch the conclusion of the morning session, or do I start at the beginning via my DVR?  

Did Someone Mention History? - We interrupt our regularly scheduled programming to revisit Tiger's 80th Tour win on Sunday, positioning him within two of Sam Snead's record total of 82 wins.  But, for those that haven't been paying attention, any golf record that predates the modern tour should be treated with skepticism.

As a digression, every time Phil or Rory has the opportunity to complete the career grand slam, we're treated to the list of players that have achieved that distinction, beginning with Gene Sarazen's win at the 1935 Masters.  Except, well, everything....  The event was then known as The Augusta National Invitational and featured only 65 players, including the long-retired Bobby Jones.  The concept of a major did not then exist, and was applied retroactively to the event.

Unsurprisingly, Snead's record is subject to dispute:
The problem stems from a 1980s study by Deane Beman, then commissioner of the tour. 
Beman deputized a host of golf historians to create an official statistical catalog for the tour, but by most accounts, it was a flawed process. Part of the problem resided in lost records when the tour and PGA of America split in 1968, leaving the group to decide what to count or discard. Though players at the time felt the panel was too strict, history has proven otherwise. 
For example, three of Snead's wins were events contested over 36 holes, with another tournament only 18 holes. Per PGA Tour policy, for a tournament to be official it must be at least 54 holes. 
Then there are the fields. Snead won the Palm Beach Round Robin five times. He faced only 15 competitors in four of those instances, and 14 in the other. While we're here, one of the 36-hole tournaments, the 1946 World Championship of Golf, had all of four players in it. Might as well credit Tiger for his "Monday Night Golf" showdowns or his seven PGA Grand Slam of Golf titles. 
We'd be remiss in forgetting to add the 1950 Bing Crosby Pro-Am. The Clambake was canceled because of darkness, with Snead tied with three others when play was suspended. Instead of coming back for a playoff, a tie was declared, all four players given the win. 
To Snead's credit, he lost recognition for the 1949 North and South Open, one of the premier tournaments of the era, because the event's purse was too small. Still, even with that added—and giving Snead the benefit of the doubt at the '50 Crosby—that brings his total down to 74 wins. Meaning Tiger Woods should not just be the official PGA Tour record holder. He should have been for quite some time, earning win No. 74 at the 2012 AT&T National.
So, according to Joel Beall, we have a new leader in the clubhouse:
So congrats, Tiger, on breaking the record. Six years ago.
Maybe that's why Sam was so cranky at Birkdale?  Just something to keep in mind whenever golf history stretches that far back for records, and majors can be even more confusing.