Wednesday, March 31, 2021

Midweek Musings

We've got a rich mélange of items teed up for today, including our first foray into that little event in Georgia in a mere eight days....  Hold that thought, though we'll start at that same small town in Georgia.

The Ladies Take Center Stage - It's the week before the Masters, so The Event Formerly Known as The Dinah takes center stage....  Sort of, as there's a wee complication.  Dylan Dethier notes it in his Monday Finish feature:

Three things to watch this week.

1. The ANA Inspiration. The year’s first major has been arguably its most compelling in recent years; this tournament feels like it goes to a playoff every time and features some incredibly

dramatic risk-reward shots coming down the stretch. With some of the game’s best players getting hot at the right time this should be the event of the week. (Oh, and with the attention elsewhere, maybe Michelle Wie West will be warmed up and ready to rock…)

2. The ANWA. Yes, in a perfect world the ANA and the ANWA would have acronyms that weren’t so similar, and in a perfect world they wouldn’t happen the exact same week, but on the bright side we get an absolutely incredible fortnight of big-time golf. The best female amateurs in the game will take on the most famous golf course in the sport and it’s going to be awesome.

I personally am not obsessing over the similarity of the acronyms, since that seems limited to both beginning with the letter "A"...  Of course Dylan elides the relevant bit, which is that the top tier of those female amateurs could be seen taking on BOTH the most famous course in the sport AND the most famous course in the women's version of the sport.

This is an issue that Mike Whan seems to have gone out of his way to hold his peace on, because it has to be maddening from the LPGA perspective.  But the effect is deeper than perhaps realized, because that small share of the golfing press set aside for the ladies is also overwhelmingly focused on the amateur event, to the exclusion of the most notable of the women's majors.  Of course, the guy dissed is in line to run the USGA, so we'll see how those dynamics play out over the long run.

James Colgan tees up the teenagers:

By virtue of its very existence, the Augusta National Women’s Amateur is a historic event. The second-ever ANWA will be played this week — a three-day, 54-hole stroke play event split between Champions Retreat Golf Club and historic Augusta National in Augusta, Ga.

In addition to signaling the return of golf to Augusta, Ga. in the month of April, this week marks two years since the inaugural playing of the event. In that tournament in 2019, Jennifer Kupcho outdueled Maria Fassi in a dazzling final round en route to becoming the first-ever ANWA champion. In March of 2020, the Covid pandemic forced tournament organizers to cancel the event for the year, dashing the tournament hopes of many of the game’s top amateurs, who had plans to turn pro within the following 12 months.

The 2021 ANWA will look different from both its predecessor and successors, and not just because of pandemic-era precautions. Augusta National has modified its qualification requirements to honor those who’d earned a spot in the field in 2020 (so long as they retained their amateur status), meaning this year’s event will feature more than a dozen more players than the 2019 iteration.

Fair enough, and I'd personally like this aspect of the event to go bye-bye:

1) Who makes the cut?

Each player who participates in the ANWA gets to play at Augusta National, but not everyone gets to play a competitive round. With the first 36 holes of the tournament at Champions Retreat, just over half the field at the ANWA (some 52 players) will be eliminated before the tournament reaches Augusta National. This is due to the cutline, which will more than halve the field following the completion of play on Thursday. At that point, the top 30 players in the field will advance to the final round at ANGC, with playoffs deciding any ties.

While the cutline sets the stage for terrific drama on Thursday afternoon, Friday is (mostly) about fun. After the final-round field is cemented at Champions Retreat, the tournament participants will head down Magnolia Lane, where each ANWA attendee is invited to participate in a practice round at Augusta National. For those who don’t make the cut, the round will mark an opportunity to enjoy an afternoon stroll around some of the golf world’s most-hallowed ground. For those who do, it’ll be the final opportunity to learn the contours and challenges of Alister Mackenzie’s design.

The event benefits from being this week and having the Masters entrants around the grounds.  That said, the ANGC majordomos are quite chintzy in the access the ladies are granted, so why not stage it the prior week and let them all play the storied venue in competition?  Only 30 players is unnecessarily limiting (what, they think they're the Olympics), but so is the day off in the middle of the event.

Colgan buried his lede by having this last, though it seems that Ruse was able to have her cake and eat it too, thanks to the pandemic:

6) Rose Zhang returns among the favorites

Rose Zhang enters the ANWA the reigning U.S. Women’s Amateur champion after a heart-stopping win in August, and fresh off earning low amateur honors in her first top-20 major finish at the 2020 ANA Inspiration. Zhang, who is still only 17 years old, enters her second ANWA the top-ranked women’s amateur in the world. She heads off to Stanford to play golf in the fall, but first the Irvine, Calif. native will look to close out an incredible high school run with a win at Augusta National.

Of course she got a watered-down Dinah, though she'll have memories of that blue wall to last a lifetime...

Good luck finding a preview piece for the Dinah ANA.  We have a couple that touch on it, first this on a certain woman that missed The Great Wall of Dinah:

Sophia Popov travels the high road en route to her ANA Inspiration debut

Sophia Popov, with her stunning victory in the AIG Women’s British Open last summer,
conceivably might have considered it tainted with a broad brush of rancor directed at the LPGA. Condemnation of the tour in the aftermath was swift and unsparing.

The general tenor of the reaction was summed up succinctly by this headline to a column in the Guardian: “Sophia Popov snub is as extraordinary as it is shameful for women’s golf.”

The hostility was unleashed by the LPGA’s decision not to deviate from protocol that granted nonmembers (of which Popov was one at the time) who won a major championship only a two-year tour exemption rather than the five years given to members. The tour also declined to grant Popov an exemption into the 2020 ANA Inspiration that had been postponed from March to September, claiming the field was set and that Popov’s ANA exemption technically didn’t begin until 2021.

Yet the 28-year-old German native declined to allow it to taint one of the best golf stories of 2020, a woman ranked 304th in the world, winning a major championship, the pivotal point of a career that finally found some traction.

 Yes, they couldn't see their way to deviating from protocols that were an hour-and-a-half old.  It says something discouraging about the human condition that, having been forced by the pandemic to make everything up form scratch, they considered those improvisations somehow to be inviolable.... Strange.

Though this 'graph had me doing a spit-take:

Popov also called it “a fun major to watch,” which she has done onsite, when it was still called the Kraft Nabisco Championship. She, too, was part of its television audience in September, and it convinced her that had she been given a choice of playing it then or in April, she would have chosen the latter. “I think that made that part easier for me.”

Yeah, we all felt that way about the damn wall...

The only other evidence of this event is this Golfweek interview with the lovely Judy Rankin, though it of course buys in to that great myth of our game:

The ANA turns 50 this year. You won the fifth edition of the event. What’s your favorite memory from your victory here in 1976?

I think just winning because I had sort of taken up the feeling that the actual winning of it was for somebody else. I think around the last three holes, I finally was slapping myself in the face and saying somebody has to win this, and it might as well be you. I birdied the 15th hole which kind of got me going pretty well, and then I hit a really good long iron into 16. But you have to understand, 15 and 16 were different holes than they are today. … There have been tweaks and re-dos over a lot of years. Not everything was exactly the way you see it today, but regardless, I won it on a really difficult day. It was very cold and very windy. I think I shot 68 in the final round. I was pretty happy with the round that day. I was just overwhelmed to have won it.


Reminds me of the Hollywood wag who once said that he was so old that he knew Doris Day before she was a virgin....  Not only was that event Judy won in 1976 not remotely akin to the ANA Inspiration moniker, it was a happening the nature of which has been swept under a very large area rug:

How a Small Party in the Desert Became the Biggest Lesbian Festival in America

The Dinah might be the coolest thing to ever come out of a golf tournament. What is now the largest annual gathering of queer women and their female allies, started as one of a number of small after-parties thrown over the weekend of a ladies professional golf tournament in Palm Springs. In 1991, nightlife promoter Mariah Hanson booked a local museum space to throw a party, and her event turned out to be such a hit that she kept bringing it back, watching it grow larger each year. This month (March 28-April 1), the now five-day extravaganza is set to attract well over 15,000 attendees.

Just to be clear, the lesbian haj to Palm Springs predates 1991.  Most of us know and are fine with this part of the events history, though they sure seem to go to much effort to hide it.

It's also another example of golf's inconsistent treatment of its history.  For some reason this event has been granted retroactive major status, though others (the dreaded Evian, for example) have mercifully not received that treatment.  

This actual preview piece just hit Golfweek's website, focused on their 18th hole in the absence of The Great Wall of Dinah:

Will a true island green create more drama at the ANA Inspiration? That's up for debate.

Depends on your definition of drama...

RANCHO MIRAGE, Calif. – The ANA Inspiration celebrates its 50th anniversary this week, and the 18th green has gone retro. No grandstand. No Great Wall of Dinah. Just an island of drama.

Or will it be?

“I honestly find it a bit boring,” said Madelene Sagstrom, who believes not many will go for the green in two, even with a forward tee. Tournament officials typically move the tee up on two days during the ANA Inspiration.

Mel Reid will likely go for it with a 5-iron in hand because she’s that kind of aggressive player, but she too believes fewer players will take on the risk with greens as firm as they are and the grass mowed down in the back and nothing there to stop it. Not to mention the yellow hazard stakes.

Wow, talk about the soft bigotry of low expectations.  Some how it's considered dramatic for a professional golfer to over-club into a green, knowing that an artificial wall will stop the ball.  

Of course fewer of the women will go for this green, but that only tells us that they only did so because the really bad options had been taken out of play.  So, we'll get fewer headcovers removed in the 18th fairway.  But, as a compensation, those that do take it on will be taking an actual risk, the outcome of which won't be known until the balls come to a rest.  That, I might argue, is actual drama, not the ersatz kind that was peddled last year. 

One other unrelated note, though still on the ladies.  Fortunately, both U.S. Opens (non-round-belly editions) had not been scheduled for Neanderthal states without mask mandates.  No, we're lucky enough to be going to The People's Republic:

There will be no fans allowed on-site at the Olympic Club in San Francisco for the 2021 U.S. Women’s Open, according to a report in the San Francisco Chronicle.

 The tournament is scheduled for June 3-6.

The Chronicle’s report says that state and local public health officials made the decision in coordination with the United States Golf Association and LPGA and that only a limited number of Olympic Club members will be permitted on-site during the event.

“It is important to have fans attend the U.S. Women’s Open,” said USWO championship director Matt Sawicki in a statement provided to Golfweek earlier this week, “but health and safety protocols for all attendees remains our first priority. We are working closely with the City and County of San Francisco as well as the State of California to create the best environment possible.”

Two weeks later and the men play their Open at...wait for it, Torrey Pines.   Seemed a good idea at the time...

A Quick Note on Slow Play - There's action in this sphere for sure, though one still suspects that the will to change is absent.  First, an actual meaningful penalty, though still not of the sort that will actually change behavior:

Yealimi Noh is only 19, yet already she has made news for the right reasons and now has done so
for a wrong reason. Noh, here to make her debut in the ANA Inspiration, received a $10,000 fine for slow play at the Kia Classic last week, the LPGA confirmed.

Noh, a Korean American who won the U.S. Girls Junior in 2018, had been fined for slow play in her LPGA debut at the Gainbridge LPGA last summer, and twice received a slow time in a round at Aviara last week, according to a report by Golfweek’s Beth Ann Nichols, before she was assessed the substantial fine for one who tied for 61st and earned only $4,247, resulting in a net loss of $5,753.

“I can’t appeal because it’s obviously my fault,” Noh told Nichols here on Tuesday. “A couple rookies got fines. Like OK, it’s a heads-up for us rookies to catch up or whatever.”

Noh is a very talented young player, though that's quite the rap sheet she's assembled in short order.

I do believe that dollars could affect behavior on the LPGA, noting her money-losing week.  Only on the LPGA would this be an issue:

It was especially difficult for the teenager to explain the lost wages to mom and dad.

Just a lucky thing that tour has no history of domineering parents....

The bigger issue though is that no monetary fine will affect behavior on the PGA Tour.  New Tour rules may be well and good, but until slow play affects their scorecards, they simply can't be fined enough to matter.

As if on cue, Daniel Zeqiri has a deep dive on slow play in The Telegraph that has much to recommend it, and not just the bits where he agrees with your humble blogger:

Fans grew frustrated with the PGA Tour's reluctance to issue stroke-penalties for slow play, relying too much on a system of warnings and fines. Given the average PGA Tour player has a figure resembling a telephone number in their bank account, financial punishments are unlikely to cause much concern.

In fairness, the PGA Tour did announce a new, more stringent pace-of-play policy at the start of 2020. This involved keeping an unpublished list of its slowest players based on timings from data provider ShotLink. Players go on and off the list based on a 10-tournament rolling period and are expected to meet a 60-second average for all shots. If they take more than this, they can be 'put on the clock' independently from their rest of their playing group.

They also introduced the concept of an Excessive Shot Time, to be issued if any player takes more than two minutes to hit a shot without good reason. If a player does this twice within the same tournament, officials have the option to issue a one-stroke penalty. Previously, players had a clean slate at the start of each round, now they are judged across a tournament.

Unless and until J.B. Holmes is banished from polite society, we'll continue to assume it's all a show.  But Zeqiri does have a certain talent for focusing in on the weakest link:

In 2019, there was a change in the rules to prevent caddies from lining their player up on the greens. The reasoning was that alignment - a player's ability to align his body and feet with the target - was a fundamental golfing skill. Quite right too, although even this straightforward change brought teething problems with Haotong Li issued a harsh two-stroke penalty in Dubai when his caddie appeared to walk away before he took his stance.

There is an argument that reading greens is also an integral part of the game and a skill in itself. While players will occasionally 'call in' their caddie to help them read the break of a putt, they will pride themselves on their ability to read greens. It is part of what separates great putters from the merely good. Any player who backed themselves to be an above average green-reader would welcome the guides being outlawed.

It's a little more than a mere argument, no?  

Like I said, just a quick take for today.  No point getting over-invested here, when there seems so little will to change.

Match-Play Notes -  Folks seemed to like it, though for the purists it was more of a mixed bag.  Shack's header on the ratings is a tell:

2021 Dell Match Play Ratings Fail To Drop As Much As They Should Have

Should have?  I don't know about that:

Slow, uneven golf featuring only-a-mother-could-love finalists who often clashed with aggressively placed corporate tents, somehow failed to deter an average of 2.6 million people from tuning into the 2021 WGC Dell Match Play, reports ShowBuzzDaily in its weekly sports ratings wrap.

Taking over four gruesome hours and apparently as much time as they wanted to get around 17 holes, the Billy Horschel v. Scottie Scheffler final drew a 1.6 final round rating on NBC, down from a 2.18 in 2019 (the 2020 event was cancelled). The match took place against the NCAA basketball tournament games involving Gonzaga and Michigan.

OK, folks were all over the slowness of that match.  But it was the first day of serious wind on a very tricked-up Pete Dye track, so I'm inclined to be a bit more charitable.

Perhaps Geoff (of all people) is ignoring the fact that match-play itself is the appeal, with the players being a bit more...well, fungible.  It also may be that, despite its obvious limitations, it's a welcome break from the mind-numbing week-to-week blandness of 72 holes of stroke play...

Or maybe Billy Ho is more of a draw than any of us considered.  Nah, that's got to be the liquor talking...

Dylan Dethier has a couple of interesting notes about the event in that Monday Finish linked above.  First, bashing the TV coverage is always emotionally satisfying, though it's hard to post much of a score in light of the low Degree of Difficulty.  But the Match-Play event places a truly unique strain on the broadcasters, with 32 matches to somehow cover.  I thought Golf Channel made an interesting decision, basically ignoring anything that happened on the front nine and picking up the matches basically as they made the turn.

Obviously, this allowed them to focus on the holes where matches were being decided, though 32 is still a lot of place to be simultaneously, so we know some, nay many, will have to be shown on tape.  But still, with all the focus on "Every Shot Live", you'd expect that a match settled on the 18th hole by the shot of the tournament would be shown, right?

WHAT WE’RE (UNFORTUNATELY NOT) WATCHING

 The video that wasn’t!

At the time, it was the shot of the tournament. Bob MacIntyre arrived at the 18th hole 1 down to Adam Long and on the outside looking in in terms of advancing through pool play. Instead, the entire scenario flipped with one shot. While Dustin Johnson was putting, MacIntyre’s massive tee shot rolled up the hill in front of the green, around the embankment and got so close to the hole that Johnson had to borrow a marker from the crowd to get it out of the way.

The wild combination of factors — the moment’s high stakes, the intrigue of the hole design, the fact that it happened just as the Johnson-Na match was wrapping up, the cool downslope-to-upslope slingshot thing that must have happened and the fact that it was a 371-yard tee shot to two feet — made this one of the most memorable match play shots I could imagine. The only problem? It wasn’t on video! British pro Eddie Pepperell was among those dismayed by the lack of coverage.

Aren't the cameras supposed to be running the whole time, just for this reason.  The DJ-Na match drew us in for sure, but this shot put McIntyre into the single-elimination draw.  Admittedly, it was a weird scene for the Johnson brothers up at the green:

And, since someone brought up Kevin Na, Dylan has quite the alternative take on that situation:

WHAT ELSE WE’RE WATCHING

A video!

Plenty of ink has already been spilt on this Kevin Na-Dustin Johnson scenario, so I’ll just add the latest development, since Lou Brown of Twitter was kind enough to clip some video of the original moment in question.
In some re-tellings of the event, Johnson had swiped away his ball before Na even had the opportunity to give it to him. That’s clearly not the case; some eight or nine seconds elapse before Johnson lopes to his ball. But that doesn’t mean Na was intentionally gaming him, either. Anybody who has played match play golf knows you sometimes space out on immediately giving away a putt.

One final word on this: Johnson shouldn’t have swiped away his putt, as other pros including Jordan Spieth attested. Nor should Na have confronted him on the putting green so publicly. I’m guessing if he had another chance he’d have mentioned something to Johnson as they walked to the next hole. Instead the entire incident looked very awkward, drew more attention — and possibly violated rules, too. Let’s move on.

Yeah, Na's reaction screamed "Virtue Signaling" to me for some reason, and he was most certainly wrong to bring it up with DJ before they left the green as we discussed at length on Monday.  But he certainly was slow to concede the putt, or at least slowish.  Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.

And this one last note from Eamon Lynch:

Lynch: Looking to eliminate Cinderella finalists at WGC Match Play? Stop inviting them.

Which distills down to this nut 'graph:

Golf is a fickle mistress and match play its most mercurial format. That is apparent not only in every edition of this tournament, but in Ryder and Presidents Cup play too. If Tour and TV executives want to ensure brand names feature in the Sunday final of the WGC Match Play — don’t expect an official acknowledgment of this desire — there’s only one way to accomplish that: invite only brand names to participate. Because if you prize Goliaths, you’d best stop inviting Davids to the party.

Less so in those Cups, but that only highlights the difference between match-play and team match-play.  I think Eamon is dead-ass wrong, that the event generates far more excitement than the average Tour event.  But that said excitement is distributed through the week in a different manner than we are used to expecting, as per Dylan Dethier:

The final vs. Scheffler was hardly must-see TV, in part because the pair …combined to hole exactly zero birdie putts (Seriously — there was one chip-in birdie and one conceded 34-footer. That’s it!) Nonetheless, this event always has an element of anticlimax Sunday afternoon. But that’s okay! We’re conditioned to Sunday afternoon representing a golf tournament’s pinnacle. But the WGC-Match Play peaks early, sometime during the early-round chaos of 32 concurrent matches during the week or Saturday’s elimination rounds. It’s a terrific event, even if it tends to finish with a whimper.

We should give these guys a little fairer treatment.  Not only was Sunday a far more difficult day to play and score, but the guys are running on fumes by the final.  It's the 24 Hours of Le Mans, and the only way to change that would be to go to Eamon's elite 4-person field, but that wouldn't qualify as a World Golf Championship.

But Eamon seems to be arguing for a 4-player draw, or at least there seems no limiting factor.   

The Most Intimidating Bunker in Golf - Not the Road or Hell Bunker, nor the Alps at Prestwick.  The most intimidating bunker in the world can be found at St. Enodoc Golf Club on the Cornwall Peninsula, a place the bride and I visited en route to Wales a few years back.  

Known as the Himalaya bunker, it looms along the right side of the par-4 6th hole of the Church Course at St. Enodoc Golf Club, in England.

That’s no slam-dunk feat; the Himalaya measures roughly 60-by-100 feet and tops out at a height of 140 feet (that’s just 10 feet shorter than the Statue of Liberty).

It did, anyway, when the architect James Braid first routed the layout in 1907, threading its holes through the heaving coastal landscape (and around a church that gives St. Enodoc its name).
Golf courses, though, are like living beings. Their natural features age and change, buffeted by winds and rain, overrun by native grasses, trampled by foot traffic. As with so much else, time takes its toll.

Such was the fate of St. Enodoc’s Himalaya bunker. Over the decades, it shrank in stature. Though still impressive, the Mt. Everest of sandy hazards evolved into something closer to K2.

For a glimpse of how the Himalaya bunker morphed through time, check out these before-and-after images, which St. Enodoc management posted recently on the club’s Instagram account.

 Well, everyone by now knows about shrinkage...

We played it as it looked in that photo on the left... It's just a wedge over the bunker, not an issue as long as ones eyes stay shut.  Your humble blogger cleared without incident, though not sure when I'll ever see the retro version on the right.

Masters Stuff - We're in tease mode for sure, but just pretend you hear the first couple of notes of a certain Dave Loggins tune in the background.  This will get you in the mood:

Masters 2021: Are these 9 famous Augusta National myths real or urban legends?
Is this photo of cattle outside Augusta National's clubhouse real or fake? Read our story to find out.

I'll go with "real", final answer... Though it didn't work out so well:

Cattle roamed the club grounds during World War II to maintain the course

When the club closed shortly after the 1942 Masters, it remained closed for several years due to World War II as many members and employees joined the war effort. With the club not financially secure at the time, co-founder Bobby Jones bought 200 cattle, figuring that not only would their grazing keep the grounds in acceptable condition, but that they could later be sold (see photo above). On the surface, a solid idea. However, according to Masters.com, “Things did not turn out as planned. With the Club closed, workers stopped the annual planting of winter grass, and as the bermudagrass on the grounds became dormant it provided little in the way of food and nourishment for the cattle. That led to a problem: the cows started eating the famous azaleas and the bark off young trees at Augusta National.” Ah, the best-laid plans …

If it had been anything but the azaleas...  Though lots of myths there:

The club lays ice on the azalea beds to help them bloom for the tournament

The Masters is known for its abundance of spring colors, and none is as synonymous with the

tournament as its azaleas, resplendent in their bright pink, red and purple colors. And what would the Masters be without them? So, it stands to reason the club would spare no expense to get the timing of the bloom for the second week of April, right? Um, no. Come on, be serious. For starters the ice would either shock the plants or melt fast, plus you’d pretty much have to have your own ice-manufacturing facility to make enough cubes to cover so much ground. While this rumor ran pretty hard for a number of years, thankfully most—but not all—Masters patrons have come to their senses.

Just look at them... they can't hardly be real.

I had forgotten about this one:

A patron once was arrested for stealing sand

In 2012, Clayton Baker wasn’t looking to pull off a heist, but he was seeking a unique souvenir—a cup of sand from one of Augusta National’s pristine bunkers. Walking back up the 10th hole after Bubba Watson won in overtime, Baker slipped under the ropes and made his way to the famous free-form bunker and grabbed a cup of sand. This would be the definition of a bad decision. By the time he made it to the 10th tee, he was handcuffed and arrested, setting off a chain of events that ultimately would cost him some $20,000 in various legal fees and other costs associated with the stunt.

Is he out yet?  Even Kamala wouldn't bail this guy out...

This might be of interest to anyone looking to read up on the event and club:

The best Masters books: 8 great reads about Augusta National and the Masters

  It's an odd format that's hard to excerpt, but this is the one I recommend:

The Making of the Masters, by David Owen

$16.99

Author David Owen received access to Augusta National archives and records to tell the story of how the prestigious club, and tournament, came to be. An enlightening look at the club’s early years, founding and beyond.

That subtitle is quite telling, as the portrait of Clifford Roberts is quite captivating.  Often dismissed as a bigot and interloper, I can promise you'll come away with a much fuller portrait of the man that made the Masters.  Yes, he couldn't have done it without Bobby Jones, but it's equally true that Jones couldn't have done it without him.

Our last Masters bit concerns the Holder, a man typically immune to emotion.  It turns out that that November Masters romp wasn't as carefree as it might have seemed:

“I had come down to have some coffee and my breakfast, and I had a really hard time eating my breakfast,” Johnson said with a laugh. Breakfast for the best player in the world is normally a sizable omelet and a hefty bowl of oatmeal with some fruit. But on Masters Sunday, it was just a
couple bites of each. “I barely ate anything.”

Johnson tends to keep things low-key during tournament weeks, spending time with his sons when he’s away from the golf course, not watching much golf on TV. But on Sunday morning holding a 4-shot lead, if there’s no breakfast to be eaten, what else is there to do but head to the course? That’s exactly what DJ did, except he traipsed out the house without grabbing the mid-day snacks his personal chef had prepared. (Chef Michael Parks made a special trip to get the almond butter and jelly sandwiches to ANGC, as he discussed on a recent podcast.)

“I was really nervous, too, on the first tee.” Johnson said. “Obviously I’ve got the (54-hole) lead in the Masters for the first time. I mean, I was feelin’ it.” With only members and their guests on-site, just a couple dozen patrons watched as he smoothed a shot with his 3-wood into the fairway. After two-putting for par, DJ says, he was able to settle himself down.

We tend to forget that DJ had gone out of his way to bring the field back into it:

But it wasn’t long before Johnson’s 4-shot lead had been trimmed to just one over Sungjae Im. After a birdie on the 3rd hole, Johnson bogeyed both 4 and 5. “It still didn’t rattle me because on 4 I felt like a made a good swing, just caught it a little high on the face. Came up a little short,” Johnson said. “Probably should have chipped that ball, but after the chip I hit on 2 …”

 Johnson had paused for a second to chuckle about that chip on 2. After short-siding himself on the par-5, he chunked his chip into a greenside bunker. Then on 3, his short chip skidded 10 feet beyond the hole. He looked at his caddie brother confused. Understandably, he put the wedge away on 4 and putted from off the green, but missed the par-saver. Golf Twitter was abuzz with the idea of another Masters meltdown.

He's human, despite all evidence to the contrary...

As long as we're on DJ, Dylan Dethier picked up on the strange wil-he-or-won't he Valero:

WHAT WE’RE WATCHING

A field list!

One very interesting thing is happening at this week’s Valero Texas Open: Dustin Johnson is playing. After edging out Adam Long, tying Bob MacIntyre and losing a strange match to Kevin Na in Austin this weekend, the world No. 1 made a last-minute schedule addition. After three lackluster performances in a row, the defending Masters champ has decided he wants to play the week before the tournament.

Why is this interesting? For one, the timing. Had Johnson made the weekend, he likely wouldn’t have played the Valero — hence the last-minute addition. And what that suggests is that Johnson isn’t quite where he wants to be with his golf swing, specifically his driver. The best club in his bag last November has been decidedly uneven his last three starts. It would hardly be shocking to see DJ roll into Augusta and play like a world-beater. But it’s increasingly clear that he doesn’t quite think he’s ready. Time will tell if he’s right.

UPDATE: So much for that. You have my permission to 50 percent disregard the last two paragraphs. I’m still perplexed why he signed up and then un-signed up, but here we are.

This highlights the effects of the Match-Play on the events around it on the schedule, because of the wide disparity in how much golf the guys will play.  But for once I agree with DJ, at least to the effect that his heater seems to have certainly waned.  I'm not liking his chances much at Augusta, not that I think that going to San Antonio would help much in that regard. 

I do have a little trip planned that will affect Masters blogging somewhat.  I'll tell you about that on Friday.  Otherwise, I'll leave you until then.

Monday, March 29, 2021

Weekend Wrap

And a fine weekend it was.  Not only did our course dry out substantially between Thursday and Saturday, but a well-worn Lincoln began its inevitable eight-month commute between Bobby D.'s wallet and my own... 

Billy Ho. Ascendant - God, I love this event, just not, yanno, on account of the Sundays...  No, the event is best appreciated for the Wednesday-Friday.  But let's give the winner his due:

By the time Sunday afternoon rolled around, Horschel and Scheffler weren’t at their best, and though neither would admit it outright, it looked like a classic case of mental and physical fatigue as the sun set on a long week.

“I think it wasn’t pretty,” Horschel said afterward. “I feel sorry for the fans watching the coverage because they didn’t see any great golf shots or very few of them at that. They saw a lot of sloppiness. They saw a lot of pars win holes and I think I made a birdie and I’m not sure if Scottie made a birdie.”

Scheffler, the 2018 University of Texas grad who the crowds were mostly pulling for did actually have one, and it came because Horschel bombed out of the second hole and conceded it.

Nevertheless, for fans of this unique event, the quality of the final is never the headline. To win the trophy, a player must handle playing seven matches in five days, and that requires three basic elements: Skill, luck and endurance. That latter includes surviving missed opportunities and the occasional bout of bad play, all while marching through the picturesque but very steep hills of Austin C.C. Sure, Horschel could have closed out Scheffler earlier, and adrenaline led him to overcook a pair of approaches after Scheffler found the water on 12 and the dreaded “native area” on 16, resulting in a pair of frustrating halved holes. But Horschel, 34 and an 11-year PGA Tour veteran, held on through those blunders, played intelligent tactical golf even when certain shots deserted him, and Scheffler helped him at the right moment with a critical missed four-foot birdie try on 14.

Endurance, followed by luck, and a deserved victory.

The format virtually ensures an anticlimactic Sunday, though this year came with a twist, colder and windier conditions that ensured a demolition derby final day.  Of course, the combination of recency bias with a tendency to over-interpret the match-play chops of those surviving until Sunday, leads to arguments such as this:

A victory which comes with more than a few implications. It’s difficult in any match-play
competition not to think about the Ryder Cup, and though there are six months and plenty of drama between then and now, both players profited from their performance in Austin. That’s according to U.S. captain Steve Stricker, who was tuned in for the duration of the event.

“Good to see three Americans in the final four and looks like taking the top three spots,” he texted as the action wound down on Sunday. “Also very excited to see Scheffler take down two of their top players.”

Yeah, not so quick.  I'll posit that, of the four semi-finalists, the only one I actually can see at Whistling Straits would be Victor Perez, the guy that went 0-2 on Sunday.  Horschel  has moved from No. 34 to No. 17 based upon this win, making him now the 11th-ranked American.  It's possible and they'll be an edge for having won this very event, but water continues to find its own level...There's a reason it's been four years since Billy was handed any hardware...

Then again, if it's all about match-play props, where does that leave Tony Finau?  I would further argue, somewhat just to be contrarian, that if you're looking for someone whose stock rose from this week you could do worse than think about Brian Karman, who I was actually touting over Finau before Alas, per Furyk made his Captain's picks.  I think you take the best player without over-thinking the match-play aspect (because none of them have much experience at fourballs), and after taking the best player one takes the best putter...

The Tour Confidential gang had some thoughts on the event:

The WGC-Dell Technologies Match Play concluded Sunday, with Billy Horschel beating Scottie Scheffler 2 and 1 in the final. The event’s format, as ever, delivered all kinds of drama and intrigue. What was the biggest insight or surprise you gleaned from watching the world’s best players squaring off in five days of head-to-head matches?

That Rory might not make the Euro team?  That Kevin Na most certainly won't make the American team.  Yeah, that second one is now a mortal lock.

Sean Zak: That Sergio is getting dialed. He may not have advanced to the final four, but he played a lot of clutch golf, and he’s starting to peak ahead of Augusta. Who else is peaking right
now? It’s hard to look around and pick out more than a couple guys who are really looking great. The Masters starts in 11 days.

Josh Sens: You mean, aside from the fact that Matt Kuchar is going to win the Masters? It was a reminder that for all the effort organizers put into trying to produce desired results, the quirks and unpredictability of match play make that impossible. And that’s the beauty of it. Best to just sit back and enjoy.

OK, two old guys that have been off their feed found a little form.  At least Josh can pretend that his tongue was firmly in his cheek.  But reality can be a harsh mistress, but Sergio has already won his Masters and Kooch, well he doesn't have a Masters, nor will he. 

Dylan Dethier: This week was a terrific reminder that match play is a delightful crapshoot. Most of the top seeds didn’t make it through match play. The final four was comprised of the 30, 31, 32 and 52 seeds. That’s like a bunch of eight seeds and a 13 making it to the finale of March Madness. These guys are [all] good!

 An 18-hole match among players at this elite level is a coin flip.  

James Colgan: My goodness, I miss the Ryder Cup. If the DJ-Na dust-up wasn’t enough to stir your imagination toward similar match play drama at Whistling in September, you might not have a pulse. (P.S. — this Scottie Scheffler fellow might make for an interesting addition to Steve Stricker’s team come September.)

The biggest issue for this event, methinks, is that people hear "match-play" and expect the Ryder Cup.  There's match-play and then there's team match-play combined with a dollop of bad blood, and the two have little in common.

They do revisit this issue, one I previewed last week:

2. Ian Poulter was among several players who said he’d rather see a single-elimination format in the first round of the Match Play, as opposed to the round-robin group format the tournament has used since 2015. (The Tour moved to groups to prevent superstars from being eliminated after one match.) Poulter said it’s a bit “annoying” that you can beat the eventual winner in a first-round match, as Poulter did in 2019, when he beat eventual champ Kevin Kisner in the first round. Poulter also said “there’s a couple of scenarios that can happen in these group matches which, if you’re in a position where you can’t advance, are you really trying really hard? Not really sure.” Is there a format solution that would address both Poulter’s and the Tour’s concerns?

There's good arguments to be made for both positions, though it would be harder to return to the uber-Darwinian single-elimination with the event two weeks before Augusta.  But let's see what the lads think:

Zak: I’m probably in the minority, but I think the current format is great. You wanna advance, play better! Don’t lose the match you need to win. I guess a hybrid model that allows for a wild card or two advancing without winning their group might make sense. But Billy Horschel and Scottie Scheffler played upwards of 115 holes this week. Do we need to add more to that?

OK, logic is hard...  This isn't really Sean's fault, as the question makes a hash of the players' concerns.  Yes, the annoying Mr. Poulter mused about the vagaries of group play, but that's a circus side show.  The bigger issue for the players is that we still have to ensure that they show up for the event...  Think I'm kidding?  Anyone remember when they tried to take this event to Australia (under the old single-elimination format)?   

Sens: As with the golf swing, it’s easy to start over-thinking this one. You can’t always legislate for desired outcomes, which was part of the motivation for moving away from single elimination in the first place: trying to protect the biggest stars from being knocked out early by fluke losses. I’m with Poulter here. Keep it simple. Make it single elimination. More excitement throughout.

I think Josh is just as muddled as Sean was... I don't think they assumed the outcomes would correlate any better to world rankings.  It just serves the purpose of ensure the guys that they'd play at least three matches, a not insignificant consideration wen the event is a Masters tune-up.

Dethier: I like the current format because Wednesday through Saturday are all immensely fun golf-watching days (Sunday’s finale really relies on compelling characters to make it great). I understand the players’ gripes, because it can feel like you have to win three matches just to make it out of pool play — but as a viewer, I’m starved for more professional match play golf. Why limit that?!

 Fair enough, Dylan, but at a lower intensity level.  Tat's the trade-off.

Colgan: Ah yes, I’ve always enjoyed the NFL’s group-stage playoff format. Sudden death is such a sudden way for one’s tournament hopes to die — which is precisely why we’ve all filled out our brackets for the round-robin NCAA tournament, in which the 16 seeds play the one seeds four times each to determine supremacy. In all seriousness, let’s stop overthinking this one. Leave pool play to soccer and give the fans what they want: drama.

Picture Tiger all-square (never tied, but more on tat later) wit, just to pick a player at random, Nick O'Hern, on the 17th or 18th hole on Wednesday.  Now that match has an entirely different feel under a single elimination format, as opposed to the current Group play format.  I know that I prefer the primal, mano-a-mano feel of the original format, but that comes at the risk of losing Nick O'Hern for the remainder of the week.... But we don't often have the opportunity to see Tiger fighting for his life, though his life needs to actually be at risk for it to hold our interest....

Let me just add one thought, in direct response to the Right Honourable Mr. Poulter, specifically his logical concern about having guys out there on Friday with no chance to advance.  While the concern seems appropriate, we should admit that such a situation might tell us interesting things about a player.  For instance, below I'll dive into the Kevin Na-DJ concession issue from Friday, but with a reminder that Na had to chance to advance when he teed it up for that round.  Still, he demonstrated something to  us in taking on DJ, and that in itself can be interesting.

Similarly, the Best Match Ever™ in this event was a Friday tie between two players that lost both their first two matches and had no hope of making it to Saturday.  I allude of course to that epic match from 2015, the first year of Group play but the last at the dreadful Dove Mountain:

Contesting a dead-rubber, having both already been eliminated, Miguel Angel Jimenez and Keegan Bradley went toe-to-toe - and very nearly nose-to-nose after a heated exchange on the
final hole of their match.

After taking relief from a temporary immovable obstruction, Bradley still didn’t have a clear swing and so had to re-drop.

At this point, Jimenez decided to intervene, much to the annoyance of Bradley and his caddie, Steve “Pepsi” Hale.

Jimenez, who had been leading one-up at the time, went on to win the hole to seal a two-up victory.

Afterwards, he described it as “a little discussion but it is done”.

Bradley was much more forthcoming.

"I felt like he was being very disrespectful to me – not only me, but my caddie," the 2011 US PGA champion said. "I felt like I had to stand up for my boy here. Me and Pepsi have been through a lot.

Not enough, apparently.  Bradley later said he got played by Miggy's gamesmanship, though I never actually thought Miggy cared until Keegan lost it.  Best part is that the scene ends with Keegan taking shelter from the storm in his courtesy car, with his girlfriend's dog in his lap for comfort.  Good times.

Shall we dive into the Na-DJ cage match?  Not that I have all that much to say about it:

At least one question remained unanswered, at least publicly, in the aftermath of the Dustin
Johnson-Kevin Na concession controversy at the WGC-Dell Technologies Match Play: Why was Na permitted to retroactively concede Johnson a putt, when such an action is prohibited under the rules?

A quick refresher: In his Friday match against Na, Johnson lipped out an eight-footer for birdie on the 11th green, leaving himself a kick-in, which presumably Na would have conceded. But before Na gave any indication that the putt was good, Johnson scooped up the ball and began walking off the green, only for Na to summon him back.

“I know it’s this [close], but you still have to wait,” Na told Johnson, using his hands to demonstrate the length of the putt. Johnson didn’t say much in response, and what he did say wasn’t picked up by microphones. On the way off the green, Na said he wasn’t claiming the hole; he was just making a point.

There seems little doubt that DJ got sloppy/lazy and that Na was within his rights to call him out.  But it's also a case where it's not clear what exactly Na was after, because the time-space continuum has not been repealed:

After the round, Na told reporters, “Obviously it’s good, but I hadn’t said anything, and he whacked it.” Na was facing a three-footer of his own, too.

“I called him over and said, ‘Hey, I’m not going to take the hole from you, but I just want to let you know before I said something you whacked the ball,’” Na said. “But I’m going to give that putt to you so we’ll call it a halve and go to the next hole.”

But that wasn’t the whole story. It couldn’t be, because under the rules of match play, a player may not retroactively concede a putt. Players also are not permitted to waive enforcement of a rule.

The term of art is stare decisis, a legal concept under which precedent guides our outcomes.  In this case, the legal precedents are Kuchar v. Garcia and Pettersen v. Lee, both of which make this outcome highly suspect.  Here's the slender reed on which they ruled:

Because Johnson said there was miscommunication, Young said, he would have been allowed to replace his ball without penalty according to Rule 3.2 b (2). But because Na said he was going to concede the putt, Young said, “we’re not going to make them place it back and then Kevin concede it.”

If Johnson had told the rules committee he had not heard Na, and the two had said, “Well, I’m just going to overlook it, I conceded that putt — well then, it would have been disqualification for both competitors,” Young said.

I see no difference in the fact pattern between this and the Kooch-Sergio incident.  What is different is that an official was on the scene immediately in the earlier incident, whereas these conversations excerpted above didn't take place until the match was over.  Given that the 11th hole outcome was finalized once the two men walked off the 11th green, having a rules official get involved two hours later is nothing short of malpractice.   As you can see, at that point the only option would be to DQ both players, and that would make the next round a tad awkward...  

3. In a classic bit of match-play awkwardness at the WGC, Dustin Johnson picked up a short putt in his match against Kevin Na before Na had conceded it; Johnson said he thought he’d heard Na give him the putt, but Na hadn’t. Na ultimately gave Johnson the putt anyway but was only permitted to do so because of what Johnson thought he had heard. In situations like this one — when a player’s opponent agrees that he/she would have conceded a putt — should the rules allow for retroactive concessions?

Look, the ruling is a mess, but Na kind of caused that.  I understand what he was trying to do, but I think he ultimately made quite a hash of it by opening his mouth in the moment.  Had there been a rules official with the group, and when you're trying to get 32 matches around a golf course there really should be, then under his recitation of the facts the hole would have been awarded to him, which is something he says he didn't want.

Zak: Oh, yeah. Why not? We ran into this silly issue with Sergio Garcia and Matt Kuchar a couple years ago and the awkward application of the Rules eventually found them delivering an apology explanation together. One galaxy brain take (first heard from the gang at No Laying Up) is that each cup should have a circle spray-painted around it. You get it inside 24 inches, it’s good. Move on.

Sens: What Sean said, exactly. Except for the 24-inch spray-paint circle idea, which is obviously ridiculous.

Dethier: Yeah, I like having some common sense apply here. Kevin Na has caught plenty of grief for calling out DJ, but it’s clear from talking to other golfers that his objection was well-founded — it was just the manner in which their conversation occurred that made the entire thing uncomfortable. One of the weird joys of match play, though.

I think Na's better option was to wait until a quiet moment to talk to DJ without a microphone present, but also after they had walked to the next tee, so that there was no issue of the outcome of that hole still being in doubt.  he could do this on the course or after the rounded ended, depending upon whether he felt compelled to head off future repetitions.   

I had a very similar incident years back in a match at Willow Ridge.  On the first green, my opponent was fidgeting with lining up the line on his ball, but without the ball having been marked.  On the walk up to the second tee, we had approximately this conversation:

Scott: Joe (not is real name), you inadvertently broke a rule there. When you align the mark on your ball, just make sure to still have the ball marked on the green.

Joe: Oh, well you know I wasn't trying to gain any advantage there?

Scott: Yes, I saw that, which is why this conversation is a helpful suggestion as opposed to calling a penalty back on the green.

 The boys do go on this tangent, though with disappointing results:

4. The Pete Dye design at Austin Country Club has established itself as a stellar match-play venue with a mix of risk-reward holes that require players to strategize. What other course would you like to see the Match Play visit?

Zak: Whistling Straits 😉 ACC is truly a great match play course, all the way up to the final hole. Let’s not ruin a good thing, but if we must, we shall get bold. Gimme the annual Match Play at Chambers Bay.

Sens: Hard to find a better do-or-die course than another Dye design: Kiawah is tailor-made for match play. And we don’t get to see nearly enough of that place.

Dethier: I obviously agree with Zak’s Chambers take. Bandon Dunes was also a terrific U.S. Am host and would be a blast to watch the pros play. But if we’re talking about a match play host, why not head to Georgia to Ohoopee Match Club? That’s the entire point of the place, after all: Risk-reward match play heaven.

Colgan: Ohoopee is the right answer, I think — how does one choose against a course literally built for match play? But for argument’s sake, how about National? Shinnecock’s sister course hosted Justin Thomas and Matt Fitzpatrick at the Walker Cup in 2013, so we know it’s possible. Playability, difficulty, history, excitement, secrecy — National has it ALL.

Honestly, I have no clue what these guys are thinking.  Kiawah and Whistling Straits are good match-play venues?  We'll see about the latter, but they actually seem to this observer more logical as stern, medal play venues.  Just because one can see water from the course doesn't necessarily make it a strategic venue...

Kudos for the reference to Gil Hanse's Ohoppee  Match Club, but James lost me after that.  James, I love the venue for any event, but it is most certainly not be referred to as "National".  It is "The National" and I would suggest you adjust your style book accordingly.

But to me there's two obvious places to take match play events, TPCs Sawgrass and Scottsdale.  Those courses are a thrill a minute, and that finish at Sawgrass seems to have been built for just that purpose.  Of course my mind wanders and I think of Hale Irwin and Bernhard Langer gagging their way through that finishing stretch had the '91 Cup been at Sawgrass instead. and except for the fact that they might still be out there, how crazy would that have been?  

Now, the astute observer will immediately intuit that the the Ryder Cup is a PGA of America event, and that one of the Five Families is unlikely to see the logic in promoting the asset of a competitive family, though I'll remind you that the USGA did take a U.S. Amateur to Sawgrass (think Tiger Woods in Slugger White's hat).  Not exactly on point, but in the general neighborhood for sure.  But what really shocks me is that neither Nurse Ratched nor Kubla Jay has taken a Presidents Cup, an ecent desperate for buzz, to one of those two courses.  

There was another rules issue that arose this week, one that had me mumbling "WTF":

Nick Faldo said he’d never known the rule in his 40-plus years as a professional golfer. Then it happened on back-to-back holes.

An obscure match-play rule came up twice during the Sunday’s semifinals match between Matt Kuchar and Scottie Scheffler at the WGC-Dell Technologies Match Play. The first instance happened on Austin Country Club’s par-5 12th, where water guards the left side of the putting surface. Scheffler played first from the fairway and pulled his approach left into the drink, meaning he’d have to drop where his ball entered the hazard before playing his fourth.

Stumping Sir Nick is a low bar, for sure.  But we had both Faldo and Zinger stumped, and those two have a combined eternity of match-play experience.  here's the citation:

The answer lies in Rule 6.4b(1), which details the order of play when a player has a choice to play the ball as it lies or take relief. Scheffler technically fell into this camp, despite his ball lying at the bottom of lake. Theoretically he could play his ball—as opposed to his ball being out of bounds, where he would be forbidden from playing it—or take relief from the hazard, which of course was the obvious choice.

The rule states, “the player’s order of play is based on the spot where the original ball lies [which if not known must be estimated].” So, where Scheffler’s ball lied after his drop is irrelevant to the order of play. Only the position of the original ball. Both players determined that Scheffler’s ball, although being at the bottom of the lake, was actually closer to the hole than Kuchar’s ball on the very front of the putting surface.

Of course, it takes some pretty wacky architecture for this to ensue, just some really wacky architecture that makes this possible on back-to-back holes.  

Just one last bit, an area in which I'm bitterly clinging to....well, my bitterness:


Well, Brad, they think they've improved our game.  That someone preferring "Penalty Area" to "Hazard" has any influence whatsoever in our game is one of life's profound tragedies.

The aspect I think I find most annoying is the rigid conformity of the TV commentators.  Like these Twitterers, I cringe each time I hear "Penalty Area" and "Tied".  As I understand their logic, the geniuses at the USGA and R&A convinced themselves that millennials couldn't possibly de drawn to our game with its arcane and confusing terminology such as "All-Square".  That strikes me as demonstrating a profound lack of confidence in the timeless appeal of our ancient game, as well as a pretty screwed up understanding of the nature of how these terms evolved organically.  And to not understand the appeal of a crazy term like "Dormie" is really just out of touch...

The good news?  Soon they'll be banning terms like "Gamesmanship" because, well you know, "man"...

Inbee-mania - Ya gotta love the girl, no?

The first round of the Kia Classic was cold, wet and windy, and Inbee Park, playing her first competitive round in three months, cruised to a bogey-free 66. Park played her best golf of the week on the toughest day, and it set the tone for the rest of the week.

Lydia Ko loved what Park had to say after that first round: “I’m just warming up.”

“I was like ‘Oh yeah, she’s back,’ ” Ko said, laughing.

Park led by as many as seven strokes at the Kia, ultimately topping the field by five at 14-under 272. Americans Amy Olson and Lexi Thompson finished tied for second at 9 under. World No. 1 Jin Young Ko placed solo fourth, six strokes back.

I just love watching her tempo, and to have her in form heading to the Dinah is just perfect.  And, not for nothing, she kind of dusted those other girls...

This game story focuses on Inbee's issues making the Olympics, which is far from a lock.  Let's first and foremost acknowledge that Inbee was the fourth ranked woman golfer in the world even before this result, so as of now would be on the South Korean team (two of the three ranked above her are fellow South Koreans, the other being Danielle Kang).  But isn't the fact that she could be excluded a rather significant indictment of Olympic golf? Just sayin'...

The TC panel had this bit about the coming week:

5. One of the most exciting weeks of the tournament season is upon us, with not only the first women’s major of the year, the ANA Inspiration, on deck but also the Augusta National Women’s Amateur; the first two rounds of the ANWA will be at Champions Retreat (Wednesday and Thursday) followed by the third and final round at Augusta National (Saturday). Which story line from those two events most has your attention?

Zak: I’m just hyped for major championship golf. And holy cow, Inbee Park smacking around the LPGA Tour this weekend was impressive. She’s suddenly the favorite (of some kind) for the first major of the year. She continues to amaze.

Sens: One of the many reasons watching the women at Augusta is so great is that we get to see the course played as it once did in the days before the back-nine par-5s played driver, mid-iron. It brings more of the drama and strategy back into the mix.

Dethier: All of it. I’m excited to watch the women battle down the stretch at the ANWA on Saturday afternoon, with the ANA finale coming the next day, college hoops’ national championships right after that and then Masters Week to follow. It’s an embarrassment of sports riches and we should soak up every moment. The story I’m most invested in is whether Nelly Korda can get into contention and ultimately close out her first major championship.

Colgan: Rose Zhang won one of the most heart-thumping amateur titles in recent memory at the 2020 Women’s Am, a tournament that just happened to conclude as the leaders made the turn on Sunday at the PGA Championship in August. She enters the ANWA the No. 1 amateur in the world and presumptive favorite. Can she write a historic second chapter in her amateur career? I’m stoked to find out.

Interestingly, they ignore that which seems the obvious issue, why are two premiere women's events competing with each other for an audience?  It's even more important when you realize that the ANA is the Masters of the women's golf world, specifically that it invite the top women's amateur players. 

So, why are the top women amateurs forced to choose between ANGC and a major?  Because the Gods of Augusta can be some of the biggest a*****s found in the wild..  They're both great events and they both deserve an audience, but the ANA owned that date and Billy Payne should have been asked why he hates women.

Is this payback?

Three University of Texas players have now withdrawn from the Augusta National Women’s Amateur after testing positive for COVID-19. Hailee Cooper was the latest to withdraw, announcing the news Sunday on Instagram. She joins Kaitlyn Papp and Agathe Laisne as Longhorns who won’t make the trip to Augusta.

.Nah!  The only ones affected are the three young ladies...

Dahmenmania -   File this one under, "Sung Kang hardest hit":

‘Open up the tab’: Joel Dahmen nabs long-awaited first Tour victory

He looks happy:


Hard to get excited about an off-field event, but this is one of Tour's good guys, and also one of its more amusing members as well.  

Good Luck With This - We are besieged by Karens these days, all touting their view of the world.  But I think you'll agree that these folks are barking up the wrong tree:

The National Black Justice Coalition (NBJC) is calling on the PGA Tour and Masters Tournament to pull the upcoming event from Augusta National Golf Club in reaction to the recent passing of Georgia’s voter bill, SB 202.

 The NBJC is also urging professional golfers to boycott playing in Georgia until the bill is repealed.

So, this is laugh-out-loud funny on a number of levels, including the obvious bit about asking the "Masters" to pull the event from Augusta National, seemingly oblivious to any understanding that this isn't just some venue rented by the tournament organizers.

The piece also serves as a synechdode for all that is wrong with contemporary journalism, presenting the claims of partisans as if they were some sort of independently verified truthiness.  It deserves scorn and laughter, so have at it.  

Cheap Shots - Just a couple of quick hits from Twitter that made me laugh.  Couldn't agree more about this, though you'd really have to work in a reference to Jordan rearranging his rapidly-receding hairline to fill out the picture:

Ick, cooties!   It's really disgusting, and I wouldn't shake a guys hand that does this.  Can't we just agree to leave our hats on?

I like this as well, because golf would be way too boring without a few naughty boys"

I do understand their concern, though I sense that most of these reactions are a bit much.  I mean, if uninterrupted stoicism is our expectation, the game will quickly bore us to death.  

But the better work from Tyrell was earlier in the week, this slow-mo video that I can't get out of my mind.  I've been unable to embed that video, so do click through if you missed it.

But, seems like a senior flex shaft, no?

I'll let you get your Monday started, and we'll catch up later in the week.