Monday, July 22, 2024

Weekend Wrap - X-Man Edition

We'll get to that very impressive coda to the men's major season, but let me offer comfort on this, the toughest day of the golf year.  Geoff usually ledes his Quadrilateral home page with the timing on future events of significance, but perhaps he too has a case of the sads, because we are, by my count, a full nine months from the next golf of significance.  I recommend taking it one day at a time....

Also, a reminder that tomorrow is departure day for Employee No. 2 and I.  The laptop is already packed and it's my intention to blog the trip, though I don't actually know what that means, since it's the same exact trip I've blogged twice already.  The week in St. Andrews will be new, but we'll see what of interest arises.

Open And Shut - I'll confess to having questioned his toughness, but yesterday made a believer of your humble blogger.  Geoff has thoughts:

Maybe it’s a San Diego thing.

On calm, cold Sunday at Royal Troon teed up for twists, turns and the first playoff in nine years, the 152nd Open Championship became a Xander Schauffele runaway. The even-keeled PGA Champion methodically put away the field with a final round 65 and 275 total. His two-stroke win finished in the same satisfying, but anticlimactic manner as Phil Mickelson’s 2013 runaway at Muirfield. That’s where the more famous San Diegan came from behind to record a three-stroke win over a similarly-bunched Saturday leaderboard.

Schauffele’s second major win of 2024 should come as little surprise given seven years of consistency in Grand Slam events dating to his 2017 U.S. Open major debut T5. Steady but unspectacular opening rounds of 69-72-69 should have been a wake-up call in a week where volatility popped up all over scorecards. Schauffele only recorded six bogeys all week, and two of those were made during Saturday’s awful back-nine weather.

He was perfectly positioned all week just off the leader's shoulder, and turned a rugby scrum of a leaderboard into a mini-runaway.

The PGA Championship winner oozed confidence beginning with his early week press conference where he leaned back, explained his appreciation for links golf, and discussed his first exposure to an Americanized version at Bandon Dunes with dad Stefan. The intense-but-rarely-neurotic 30-year-old from San Diego State never seemed phased by the unexpected wind directions at Troon, taking note of early play Thursday and, unlike some peers who struggled with the awkward southeast direction, chalked up the surprise to the joys of golf in Scotland.

An organized but rarely over-tinkering type in recent years, he leans heavily on longtime looper Austin Kaiser. Teeing off Sunday at 2:05 p.m., Schauffele hit 16 of 18 greens and all of the back nine surfaces to pass playing partner Justin Rose and Billy Horschel by two strokes. Both runners-up birdied the last to make the final result look closer than it seemed.

Billy Ho actually birdied his last three holes, to make is seems that he stayed close.  The reality is that any focus on the final group was mostly about the unknown South African.   But Xander's four birdies on that brutal back nine made it all moot....

Shall we visit with the Tour Confidential panel?

Xander Schauffele played a flawless Sunday of golf en route to winning the Open Championship and claiming his second major of the season (and career) following his PGA Championship victory two months ago. What did he do better than everyone else at Royal Troon, and what’s been the difference for Xander this year compared to years past?

Jack Hirsh: The simple answer is that the work he’s done with Chris Como has taken his ball striking to a new level. His tee shot on 15 Sunday really struck me. As someone who has
historically played a draw, Schauffele had to stand up there, aim left and let the wind bring his ball back to the right and into the fairway. He unleashed one 343 yards, dead center. This year, he’s the only player inside the top 12 in Strokes Gained: Off the tee, tee to green, approach and putting. The past two seasons, he was outside the top 30 in SG: Off the tee, so there’s been a clear improvement with the driver as he’s become not only one of the longest players on Tour, but one of the more accurate. The more intangible answer is that he simply has developed that killer instinct that had been lacking for so many years on the biggest stage. That’s hard to develop, but he was stoic down the stretch Sunday and at Valhalla two months ago.

Zephyr Melton: What he did better at Royal Troon than anyone else was he kicked it into high gear on the weekend. His Saturday 69 came in the dreadful afternoon wave, and his bogey-free Sunday was as stress-free as they come. It seems that getting over the hump at Valhalla has opened the floodgates. There could be many more majors in X’s future.

Josh Sens: Like so many winners of this tournament in the past, he held on well through the worst of the conditions, and then charged when things turned benign. Schauffele has long been known for his mental strength, a makeup built for majors. Now that he has further sturdied his swing, he’s got the mechanics to match. Both were on display this week. That’s a potent combo.

Jessica Marksbury: I think flawless is the real key word in the question. For both of his major wins this year, Schauffele won firing final rounds of 65 both times. Bogey-free on Sunday at Troon, and one bogey at Valhalla. That’s incredible! When others were wilting, he had the confidence and presence of mind — not to mention the shot quality and clutch putting — to push on to victory. He’s been close so many times that it seemed like it was only a matter of time before he cracked the code. And now he’s done it twice.

Has Xander been known for his mental strength?   Seems like some Soviet-level historical revisionism, or perhaps over-interpreting the on-course stoicism.  But he's struggled to finish, despite a huge number of high places, though he might have figured that last part out.

Now the inevitable floodgate query:

Schauffele is just the sixth player in the last 25 years to win multiple majors in a season, joining a list that includes Tiger Woods, Padraig Harrington, Rory McIlroy, Jordan Spieth and Brooks Koepka. Is this one epic heater? Or are the floodgates open and this major-winning version of Xander is here to stay?

Hirsh: Well, the commonality between three of those five names (Harrington, McIlroy, Spieth) is after winning multiple majors in a season, they combined to win just one (Spieth at the 2017 Open) afterward. Brooks has won two more since he won two in 2018, making Tiger the true outlier. My money is that Xander might win another one, but this is the clear peak of his career.

Melton: I think it’s the latter. Xander has put himself in contention many times in the past, and now he’s learned how to close. I fully expect him to knock off several more majors before his career ends.

Sens: Heading into this week, he had 14 top 10s and two runners-up in 24 majors. This year isn’t so much an epic heater but an example of what happens when a player who has been banging reliably on the door for a long time finally breaks through. I’d be shocked if we don’t see more of the same down the line.

Marksbury: If there’s anything we’ve learned over the years, it’s that winning majors is hard. Schauffele has made it look easy. It’s amazing to think that his major tally is now equal to Scheffler’s. I definitely believe he has the bandwidth to win more, but a two-major season is extremely special and not something I expect to see with any regularity going forward.

That twenty-five year metric seems specifically designed to avoid harshing the floodgate narrative with Mark O'Meara, no?  But 

Winning is so difficult, especially at majors with their full fields, that it's a bit unfair to use a metaphor like floodgates.  But Xander has already added a second one, far more impressive than that PGA, so who knows where his game might be in April?  I mean, we could ask Viktor Hovland about the half-life of heaters....

This on the venue is delightfully comedic:

This was the 10th time Royal Troon has hosted an Open. How would you grade the course as a major championship venue and test?

Hirsh: I loved the course and the setup. The Open is dependent on weather and it was really fun to watch the best in the world slog through some nasty conditions this week. The Postage Stamp 8th may be the par-3 I want to play most in the world. I think some of the criticisms and comparisons to the USGA over Saturday’s setup were unfounded. The difference is the U.S. Open plays in locations with predictable weather while the Open does not. Only the last couple groups really had to struggle on the back nine Saturday, and they had pretty favorable conditions on the front line. That’s just how links golf works. I give Troon an A.

Melton: I certainly enjoyed watching this week. I’ve never been out to Troon (or any other Open rota course for that matter), so it’s difficult to judge from afar, but I think it’s in the top half when grading Open courses.

Sens: Loved it. What I loved even more was the weather. All the rota courses are great. They are greater when the elements kick in. This week produced all the quirks and randomness you could hope for at an Open (surprise contenders; big-name flops), and then, ultimately, a marquee winner. Not sure you could ask for more, except perhaps more white-knuckle moments on the final holes. But blame Schauffele for that. Not the course.

Marksbury: Agree, Josh. The weather is what makes the Open the Open! Getting a taste of the brutality on Saturday made for great viewing. Troon gave us an exciting leaderboard and an excellent champion in Xander. What more could you ask for?

That Zephyr Melton response belongs in  a sports writing hall of fame somewhere, the combination of professed ignorance and unsupported opinion being worthy of the N.Y. Times.  Maybe he could tell us why it's in the top half and which rota courses rank below it....

But I do think Troon had a pretty good week, as the variable wind directions were a revelation for those that aren't familiar with Golf in the Kingdom.  And who doesn't like watching these guys get wet and the intricate ballet involved between caddies and players.

I though the course looked more visually appealing that I remembered it, and those two signature holes delivered the goods.  How do you not like scenes such as this?

Especially since the railways fueled the growth in golf back in the day, as per this poster:


These would be cut-makers per Geoff:

Who won The Open without winning The Open?

Hirsh: Justin Rose has another major in him.

Melton: Thriston Lawrence. His solo-fourth place finish gets him an invite back next year, plus an exemption into the Masters to boot. The ​​$876,000 paycheck ain’t too bad, either.

Sens: I can’t top those calls but will go with 20-year-old Callum Scott, a Scot, finishing as top amateur on home turf. He had tears in his eyes coming up 18 for good reason.

Marksbury: I’ll go with Daniel Brown. He went from an under-the-radar DP World Tour player to an Open contender with cult-hero status, thanks to a charming cig-and-selfie session on the 18th hole on Saturday. I’m a new fan!

Felt bad for Rosie, for whom this might have been the last, best hope.  But Thriston Lawrence was completely new to me, so I'll give him the nod.

And on the least important subject imaginable:

Scottie Scheffler tied for 7th at Royal Troon, but his easy stroll to PGA Tour Player of the Year just got a little more interesting. Scheffler has six wins this season (including the Masters and Players) but Schauffele now has two majors (but no other wins). With some of 2024 still left to play out, is Scheffler still the front-runner?

Hirsh: I’m still going with Scheffler. Schauffele has played well in other tournaments this year, but I think six wins (when one is a major and another is a Players) trumps two majors and no other wins. We’re talking about Player of the Year, not Player of the Majors. Sustained excellence really means something. That said, if Schauffele was to catch and pass Scheffler at East Lake and add another win, or even a fourth, that would be a different story.

Melton: I think Scottie is still the front-runner because of his full body of work (six wins, plus a major), but Xander has certainly made the decision much harder.

Sens: Tough call. It’s neck and neck. But given the primacy of majors – especially in our divided era when we only see all the biggest guns in those four events – I’ll put Xander ahead, if only by a half a nose.

Marksbury: It’s still Scottie in my book. But as Jack mentioned, the Olympics and FedEx Cup — and recency bias — means there’s a lot left to consider. And it ain’t over ’til it’s over.

But I do like the question for a couple of reasons.  First, it highlights the tenuous importance of the PGA Tour.

Most will view this as Scotties 6-2 advantage in total vs. Xander's 2-1 advantage in majors.  But I give a different 2-1 edge to the X-man, as he won two full-field events to Scottie's one (The Players).  Scottie may have run up a gaudy win total, but he didn't have to beat too many guys to do so.

Goeff will have a losers post at some point, but see what you think of this:

Schauffele’s PGA and Open titles highlighted the 2024 major season, although now that all four are complete, which pro is walking away most disappointed?

Hirsh: Most disappointed in himself? Definitely Tiger. The dude has no comprehension of mediocrity. His worst career finish at the Masters followed by three MCs has gotta hurt for him. Whether his own expectations are realistic? That’s another debate for another day.

Melton: Jon Rahm. Since bolting for LIV and a guaranteed payday, he’s not been the same dominant player he once was. A T7 finish at Troon salvages his major season a bit, but ultimately 2024 will go down as a lost year.

Sens: You guys are being very kind to Rory McIlroy.

Hirsh: Oh yeah, forgot about that guy.

Marksbury: All solid picks there, guys. Rahm was the first player who jumped to mind for me. But in the interest of variety, I’ll tap Wyndham Clark. After a banner year in 2023, it seemed like major mediocrity would be a thing of the past. But this year’s finishes — MC, MC, T56, MC — leave much to be desired for the current World No. 5.

I agree that Rahmbo and Clark have been hard to figure, but Rory's Thursday and Friday were some kind of Faustian passion play.  As I noted Friday, Rory has never been able to handle wind and firm surfaces, despite that stamp on his passport.  But I find it peak Rory that, facing an unexpected shift in wind direction, that the player least prepared to adjust is a grizzled veteran like Rory.  That's when you need a professional caddie, whereas Rory has chosen a guy whose greatest contribution is to not make Rory feel sad.  Who are we to question those choices?

But, Lordy, I almost missed this gem that sums up the guy's week:

These guys are good! 

Much was made of Xander winning both major's with Sunday 65's, but one of those was not like the other:


So … where then does this one rank?

“At the very tip top,” Schauffele said emphatically. “Best round I’ve played.”

That’s not meant as a slight to his achievement at Valhalla in Louisville, where birdies came in
bunches but the pressure of winning a first major title made gathering each and every one of them a challenge, right down to the 72nd hole. Rather, it was an affirmation of how much the 30-year-old San Diego native has grown as a golfer. Schauffele had proven himself capable of handling super-sized/lush rough/slick greens American monoliths, having won eight times on the PGA Tour and comfortably being regarding among the best players in the game. By contrast, mastering a quintessential links course on the west coast of Scotland, a staple of the Open rota yet a venue Schauffele had never seen until Monday, wasn’t something he was predisposed to accomplish.

“It's a completely different style of golf,” Schauffele said of Troon. “It makes you play shots and have different ball positions. There's so much risk/reward when the wind's blowing 20 miles an hour and it starts raining. There's so many different variables that come into play.”

C'mon, Valhalla vs. Troon?  Interestingly, the final round scoring average for each Sunday would explicate the difference, but including that would be actual journalism.

Ill just leave you with this cheery note:


From the 16 players signed to the Saudi-backed league, nine managed to make the cut.

But, despite a flicker of hope for Jon Rahm on Sunday, nobody from Greg Norman’s breakaway remotely managed make a challenge for the Claret Jug.

It was quite a struggle for the LIVsters in all the majors, with the exception of Bryson.  So maybe we take him back and leave all the other guys in purgatory?

And this about another fading star:

British Open 2024: Justin Thomas' claret jug chances die with shockingly bad opening tee shot on Sunday

 


Perhaps uncharitable of me, but that shot tracer reminds me so much of Rory's opening tee shot at Royal Portrush.....Remind me again, where is next year's Open?

That's it for now.  Not sure if I'll blog tomorrow morning, but we fly out tomorrow night and you'll likely hear from me from the Highlands on Thursday.  Have a great week.

UPDATE:  No sooner do I hit "Publish", than Eamon posts this:

Well, since you recommend it so highly, maybe we'll head there....That's the sixth green, with the 5th fairway (Hell Hole, as we'll soon revisit), but there are far prettier spots on the Balcomie.   Maybe I'll show you a few.

Friday, July 19, 2024

Your Friday Frisson - To Ayr Is Human Edition

Feeling a bit guilty about the absence of content since Tuesday, so how about some bonus Friday musings?  I'll not keep you long, especially since I have Round 2 playing in the background.

The Leader - Whatever your view of The Da Vinci Code, this seems excessive by about seven:

British Open 2024: 7 things you need to know about Daniel Brown, the surprise Day 1 leader at Troon

But, will I need to know any of these seven things at the end of business today?  I'm going with a hard "No" here....

I watched about four hours of coverage, on tape so skewed towards the morning wave.  I did fast forward sufficiently to cover Tiger's first 4-5 holes, but completely missed the guys, like Brown, that went low late in the day.

Today in irrelevant firsts:

1. Brown is the first player in men’s major championship history to shoot a bogey-free 65 or lower in his first career major round.

Just think about that for a second. Of the thousands of golfers to have teed it up in a major, no one, not Bobby Jones, Jack Nicklaus, Arnold Palmer or Tiger Woods has been able to do what Brown accomplished on Thursday. It’s kind of humbling when you think about it.

He's a 29-year old Brit who got in through qualifying and went out at 4:16 p.m., in the penultimate group, so I'll not expect him to get much air time on Sunday.  Still, these guys are good, and there are thousands of them.

I mean, I think I like the guy, though based on this limited evidence:

7. Brown made a point after the round on Thursday that he didn’t want to make too big a deal of his accomplishment.

Yeah, it’s his first career major start, but Brown is here to win a tournament, not just have a magical first round. And to treat things differently simply because of a low score would potentially set himself up for a letdown later in the week. It’s why he says he didn’t want to take a picture of the leaderboard after his play.

“I'm sure some people will get them, but not me,” Brown said. I'm going to try and sort of keep my feet on the ground a bit and take on the job again tomorrow.”

The job of British Open leader … that sounds pretty good.

 Still, as much as I like it, get the picture, Dan, it might prove to be your only chance....

The biggest takeaway from Day One was the difficulty, mostly the result of a change in the wind direction, causing the outbound holes to play into a stiff breeze.  As a result, many alpha dogs will need to grind on Friday:

I'll just list them, not all of which are so shocking, then circle back with a few notes. 

Ludvig Aberg (4 over)

Bryson DeChambeau (5 over)

Tommy Fleetwood (5 over)

Tom Kim (5 over)

Max Homa (5 over)

Sahith Theegala (6 over)

Henrik Stenson (6 over)

Rory McIlroy (7 over)

Wyndham Clark (7 over)

Tiger Woods (8 over)

Cameron Smith (9 over)

Are you done laughing over Henrik's inclusion on this list?   And Tiger is now double-digits over par, so back to you, Monty.

I guess this is as good a time as any for this mini-Tour Confidential panel:

The first round of the 2024 Open Championship had everything it should have — rugged Scottish weather, unpredictable winds and, of course, players scratching their heads trying to get out of those pesky pot bunkers. Daniel Brown (six under) holds the lead after an eventful Day 1. What was the biggest surprise on Thursday at The Open?

Josh Sens: I’ll pluck the low-hanging fruit and go with Rory McIlroy’s seven-over opening round. No doubt he drew some of the worst of the weather, but a few of his stumbles — the OB
tee shot on 11, the indifferent wedge on 13 and so on — seemed as much mental glitches as anything. I’m not sure that anything in links golf counts as a true shocker — we’re supposed to expect the unexpected — but often what’s even harder to get a handle on these days is what’s going on in Rory’s head.

Josh Berhow: Daniel Brown is 29 years old and making his first major start, and before his 61st-place finish at the Genesis Scottish Open, he had missed six cuts and withdrew from another tournament in a seven-event span. So of course he leads! He birdied two of the last three and didn’t make a bogey for a brilliant major debut. But other than Brown’s surge up the leaderboard, the answer has to be Rory. Like so many others I thought he’d really bounce back this week, but we didn’t see that today.

Jack Hirsh: It’s Justin Thomas’ late-round recovery. He took the lead at four under, which, despite his opening-round 62 last week, is surprising on its own. But then his round could have gone off the rails when he couldn’t do anything with the best drive of the day on 11, doubled 12 and bogeyed 13. I thought we were heading for a 75 and eventually another missed cut in what’s been a long streak of bizarre play from the two-time major winner. But he righted the ship, knocked it stiff on 17, one of the toughest holes all day, and made a solid birdie putt at the last to grab the best round of the morning wave.

Ryan Barath: Rory’s first round was truly shocking, and to be fair so was Bryson DeChambeau’s. Both of these players handled tough conditions at Pinehurst extremely well, and today I was hoping to see them jockeying for position atop the leaderboard at Royal Troon — not sitting well below the potential cutline. If I had a second pick, I agree with Jack in that Justin Thomas’ recovery was not what I was expecting after his mid-round troubles. He still continues to struggle with consistency, and after the double bogey I was half expecting a full ejection.

Dylan Dethier: The biggest surprise, for me, was a delightful one: Troon played tough! I know the fellas snuck a couple low ones through at the end (shoutout Dan Brown) but the fact that only 17 pros are under par after the first round means good scores were well earned. The only thing better than an Open is a tough Open. Can’t wait for the rest of the week.

 A green shirt under a black sweater?  What is the man thinking?

But not sure I get Joel Beall's caution flag:

British Open 2024: Rory McIlroy stumbles to 78, but save your takes for another day

Don't see why I should eschew the snark, given that Rory's next event of importance is in, checking calendar, April.

It’s only Thursday, and Thursdays are not for extrapolating. A final round, hypothesize away. Final rounds are where someone’s spirit and heart are on the line with every shot, even though the shots from the days before count the same, because there’s a trophy to be grabbed or fumbled or remain just out of reach. The final round can only matter because of the round before it, and you better believe a round that ends with a cut matters too. But Thursdays? Extracting anything of substance from Thursdays can be a fool’s errand, if not wildly unfair to the player who authored the performance.

Which is a long way of saying, save your Rory McIlroy takes, at least until tomorrow.

Hmmm.... So you want us to focus on final rounds, with Pinehurst seared in our memories?

McIlroy, the man engaged in a forever war with who he once was against the hope of what he
could be again, is no closer to ending that battle at the Open Championship, a sloppy inward nine equating to a seven-over 78 on Thursday at Royal Troon.

“It felt OK. I've come in here playing really well. I played well at the Renaissance last week,” McIlroy said. “I think, if anything, it was more like the conditions got the better of me, those cross-winds … Then once we turned on that back nine, it was left-to-right winds. I was sort of struggling to hole the ball in that wind a little bit, and that got me.”

For the first few hours McIlroy held his own, bouncing back from an opening bogey with a birdie at the third. Yet links golf is like the Marines, rejecting anything less than good, and McIlroy didn't bring his best.

I don't like Rory's game in any wind, so maybe that's sufficient explanation.  But let me posit that this might bring Rory's caddie into the discussion as well.  The guys showed up Thursday and got thrown a curveball with the wind direction.  Sounds like the exact circumstances in which an experienced caddie is critical..... has Rory ever considered getting one of those?

Eamon Lynch has an amusing take on Bryson's day:

Conventional wisdom, grounded in a data sample compiled over the past 164 years, says the key to success in the Open Championship is more about art than analytics, that links golf itself is best
understood through poetry rather than pedagoguery. So it came as no surprise to learn Thursday that Bryson DeChambeau is taking the opposite tack in trying to solve a puzzle that continues to confound him.

His opening round in the 152nd Open was, as the Scots say, dreich — a word usually reserved for the dismal weather that has settled over the Ayrshire coast. Like a whiskey hangover, it began painfully and offered little respite. He was 6-over-par through eight holes. The skill for which he is most celebrated — the tee ball — was firing, but not much else. In approach play and putting, DeChambeau wasn’t close to breaking the top 120 in the 157-man field as the day wore on. He made 104 feet 5 inches of putts, but 54 feet 11 inches of that came on one stroke, an eagle putt on the 16th hole. He signed for a 5-over par round of 76.

Love the word "dreich", which feels almost Yiddish.

Though this will have eyes rolling:

“It’s something equipment-related. The golf ball is — look, I’m not at 190 ball speed, so particularly when I’m hitting driver or 3-wood, those clubs are built for around that speed, that 190 ball speed, and my 3-wood around 180, so colder, firmer conditions the golf ball is not compressing as much,” he said. “So it’s probably something along those lines.”

Yeah, that's the ticket.

Alan, Asked -  Time being a factor, I'll riff on a special Open Championship edition of Ask Alan:

Is Bobby Mac’s win tainted by that very questionable drop that was allowed? Asterisk win in my opinion. @mkloetz

I agree it felt egregious but professional golfers have always been aggressive in taking advantage of the rules. We’re gonna run out of asterisks if we give MacIntyre one and then apply the same smell test to all of his colleagues. Bottom line: The rules can help you as much as they can hurt you. Fans and reporters can kvetch about the spirit of the game but, in general, the pros are less sentimental; they go by the letter of the law. Bobby Mac’s drop was legal and therefore he is unbothered.

Patrick Reed was unavailable for comment....  Most certainly a lucky break, but divine provenance for sure, given the popularity of the win by the Local Hero.  Now we know why they cling to their metal spikes.

This is quite silly:

Should national opens be separated from tours and handled differently? I just feel that a national open should not be considered a “tour event.“ It tends to denigrate it. @StryderJa39237

I, too, am sentimental about national championships. They have so much history and gravitas. But, in the new golf landscape, I think it helps these proud tournaments to be aligned with a major circuit, specifically the PGA or European Tours. Just look at the better fields and increased buzz and exposure the Scottish Open has enjoyed in the last couple of years after the “strategic alliance” made it a full-blown PGA Tour event. Same goes for the Mexican Open. Conversely, look at how the Australian Open struggles to attract top talent despite its incredible history and venues. I would love to see the PGA and European Tours become more invested in the once-proud Opens that are now languishing, like the Japanese and South African. It would elevate the tournaments and tours.

Alan is mostly sensible here, though the issues in Australia cover what used to be a series of meaningful events.  But I'll not lose any sleep over the South African Open, thank you very much.

This looks different after his Thursday round:

What needs to happen at the Open to make this an A or A+ major season? Redemption for Rory? Bob wins on home turf? Scottie laps the field? @Q_Brunk

Bob is great fun but doesn’t move the needle that way. Not yet. It’s already been a pretty good major championship season. Scottie Scheffler snuffed out all the drama on Masters Sunday with his brilliance but it was a very significant win, stamping him as a player for the ages. Valhalla is a crappy venue but we got a lively shootout and very worthy champ in Xander Schauffele. The U.S. Open was epic. Right now, I’d say we’re at a B+. A Rory win at Troon would take this season to an entirely different level because of the emotional weight and historical import. Same with a Spieth renaissance. Bryson DeChambeau going back to back and usurping Scheffler as the game’s dominant force would be massive. Setting aside science fiction—Tiger or Phil coming back from the dead—I don’t see any other outcome that would shake the sports world.

 Reality is a bitch.  As I like Todd Hamilton's chances better than everyone he cites...

But we'll always have Sergio:

#AskAlan According to Sergio, his victory and the team victory were part and parcel of the biggest day in Spanish sports. Are LIVers really that out of touch? @david_troyan

Well, there are LIV loyalists and then there is Sergio who has an insurmountable lead in the world ranking of golfers suffering delusions of grandeur. Spain winning the Euros is a huge deal. Alcaraz taking a second straight Wimbledon is a source of tremendous national pride. Sergio winning LIV Andalucia is … vaguely noteworthy? There was a good crowd at Valderrama and all those Spaniards certainly delighted in Garcia’s win. But LIV results are lightly reported even in countries with golf-mad populations. In Spain, golf in general and LIV in particular have a long way to go to penetrate the national consciousness. But, hey, I guess we can’t begrudge Sergio getting caught up in the moment and wanting to make himself part of a very special day for his home country.

I'm thinking we can and must begrudge Sergio just about everything...

#AskAlan Where does Troon fit in your ranking of the Open rota? @Kevinp613

Aesthetically, at the bottom. It’s a flat, unimaginative, out-and-back layout with all of the charm confined to one hole, the Postage Stamp. When the back nine plays into a big wind, the course is a beast and it can’t be an accident that it has produced a roll call of big-time winners. Still, I must confess that Troon doesn’t do it for me. I rank the rota in this order: Royal Portrush, Old Course, Turnberry*, Birkdale, Muirfield, Carnoustie, St. George’s, Liverpool, Troon, Lytham.

I agree aesthetically, and I love that Alan thinks that highly of Portrush, with which I concur.  But Troon might be one of the best bets to resist low scores, not that we obsess the same way over there.  But Alan might just have to take Turnberry off that list, which is our loss.

Do LIV guys who win majors receive bonuses from LIV? @SamGrantHoya

Every contract out there is different. At least three of the biggest names have built-in bonuses for winning major championships but my sense is that a lot of players don’t. LIV deals in general are about guaranteed money, not speculative.

Why?  Are we worried about them making rent?

Any chance of the ruling bodies agreeing to a golf club rollback in my lifetime? Running out of courses here in the U.S. that are true tests. @apindara

There isn’t a single golf course on the planet that is long enough to properly test the pros. There are so many variables across golf courses that it would be a nightmare to try to regulate all of them, unless with a blanket rule like reducing the maximum clubhead size of drivers to 300 ccs, which I would support. It’s much easier to regulate the ball. Alas, the USGA’s current proposed rollback (realistically five percent for pros) is far too tepid and will not restore a meaningful balance to the game. I’d like to see a bifurcation whereby amateurs can play their current balls and the pros get dinged closer to 20 percent. Hopefully, the USGA is just getting started.

I'm not holding my breath, but let's see how their ball changes pan out. 

Your prediction: how many years from now until we see all of the best players in the world playing 15+ events together in a season? @Thomaskeyboard

It’s not going to happen as long as His Excellency Yasir Al-Rumayyan remains in power. LIV Golf is his baby and he is fully committed to funding it. That doesn’t change if/when the Saudi Public Investment Fund pours a billion (or two) dollars into PGA Tour Enterprises. LIV’s top players will still be committed to 14 events on that circuit. Throw in four majors and their schedules are already filling up, given that most top dogs only play around 25 events per season. If a deal is consummated between the PIF and PGATE, there will be some onramps for LIV golfers to compete in Tour events, but they are not going to have the time or inclination to play more than a handful each year.

 Not sure I miss them all that much, anyway.

Why not give Sergio David Duval’s spot in the open? @glennmcspadden

Ah, the annual Duval bashing is right on schedule! Poor Double D. He doesn’t set the rules for the Open. The R&A does. And every year, the R&A invites him to play, per his past champion status. Who wouldn’t enjoy a little junket to the linksland? It is a privilege he earned. The R&A is at fault here—it needs to make age 50 the cap for past champ exemptions.

 Why?  Are there greens that need damaging or cups requiring saliva?  Whatever we think of Duval, Sergio is where he belongs, in purgatory.

Have a great weekend and enjoy the Open.  We'll wrap it on Monday, then we leave for Scotland Tuesday night.

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Tuesday Tidbits - Ayrshire Edition

It was beautiful on the West Coast of Scotland yesterday, as I'm sure it will remain.  Shall we dive in on that very topic?

Everyone Talks About The Weather... - Forget the players and their form, we lede with this all-inclusive header:

British Open 2024: Weather forecast includes rain, wind and 'uncertainty'

Those last three are familiar to me, but what is this "British Open" of which they speak?  I thought the Open Championship was this week (a little purist humor for you).   

But does it make sense to practice on Monday in still conditions, when the week will look more like this:

And perhaps like this as well:


Quite the compelling case, I might just tune in.  Though I wouldn't be crushed if Scotland got all this rain out of its system, not that what happens in Ayrshire much affects the Kingdom of Fife.

Stepping On Your Story - Martin Slumbers, the retiring R&A majordomo, hit the interview circuit, including the Golf Channel set, to talk purses and priorities:

A record amount of prize money is being offered at this week’s British Open, with the winner to receive $3.1 million from a $17 million purse.

The R&A announced the increase of $500,000 from last year’s event at Royal Liverpool, but also cautioned that the escalating prize money in the game is a concern.

“The R&A has a responsibility to strike a balance between maintaining the Open’s position in the global game, providing the funds required for governance and developing amateur and recreational golf in 146 countries internationally,” said Martin Slumbers, CEO of the R&A. “We have to make choices if we want to continue to build on the significant growth in participation that is essential for golf’s future.

“We remain concerned about the impact substantial increases in men’s professional prize money are having on the perception of the sport and its long-term financial sustainability. We are determined to act with interests of the global game in mind as we pursue our goal of ensuring golf continues to thrive in 50 years’ time.”

So, a warning shot to those overly-entitled touring professionals, who might just miss  the message on account of this:


Nothing says control your greed like staging the return of the Claret Jug in a $200,000 automobile.  

The Postage Stamp - They'll have us quite sick of it before the first tee shot, but who doesn't like a shortie?  Shack has all sorts of bullet points for us:

  • 123 yards: Official Open yardage. 
  • 5: Bunkers. 
  • 33 paces: Green depth. 
  • 1907-1909. Established in these years by architect and club professional in Willie Fernie overhauling the course. 
  • 1922-23: James Braid adds 67 bunkers to Troon including two on the Stamp. 
  • 15 feet: Drop from tee to green.
  • 5th: Shortest hole in major history. (Shortest: 15th Los Angeles Country Club 2023, 81 yards).
  • 3.09: Scoring average in the 2016 Open. (87 birdies, 290 ars, 66 bogeys, 11 doubles and 1 other)
  • 3.09: Scoring average in the 2004 Open. (82 birdies, 273 pars, 83 bogeys, 19 double bogeys+)
  • 4: Score of Greg Norman in his 1989 Open final round 64, the only bogey of the day.
  • 3: Hole-in-one’s during The Open (Gene Sarazen, Dennis Edlund and Ernie Els)
  • 1994: The Postage Stamp gets a Royal Mail postage stamp designed by Paul Hogarth and valued at 35 p as part of a collection that included versions of St.Andrews, Muirfield, Carnoustie and Turnberry.

Sarazen's was quite the thing, made in 1973 at age 71, and age at which he'd no longer have a tee time. Operating from memory, but I believe he holed out for a two on his  other crack at it.

Geoff dives into the history:

I thought it’d be fun to trace the wee three’s evolution into one of the world’s wildest, weirdest and shortest championship holes on a proven links. Troon’s 8th hole stands out for so many reasons, including a strange lack of super-shorties on the Open rota (but the short-yardage gems are coming back in all of golf, as I wrote in the new Links).

Besides its tiny size and distance, the 8th at Royal Troon reminds us that most all-time great holes were not dialed in from day one and that changes carried out with the intent of spicing things up, in the right hands, can make things better.

Troon’s evolution into the course we know today involved a series of updates fairly typical of early links reacting to popularity shifts, the desire to reach 18 holes, and changes in the ball.

“Originally the course contained only nine holes, afterwards it was extended to twelve holes, and subsequently to the full round of eighteen,” Horace Hutchinson wrote of Troon in 1897’s epic, British Golf Links. “Surveying the links in their primitive state, even the most enthusiastic golfer would have been appalled at the prospect of playing over them; but with perseverance all obstacles have been overcome, the result being that a most enjoyable game can now be had upon them.”

Early Troon appeared primitive, raw and appeared to be an extreme cross-country affair. Yardages were presented from named hole to name hole, not by a number. The shortest measured 197 yards. Par was not printed but the distance to play the entire 19th century 18-holes was listed as 3 miles, 1 furlong, 156 yards.

Crail has a hole named for a battle in the second Boer War, so why not this?

The most photographed and discussed early hole seemed to be the seventh. Early Troon golfers played on some of the same ground as today’s hole, with one key difference. The early iteration of Tel el Kebir measured 322 yards and featured a blind uphill second shot to a green perched beyond today’s version. The hole had been named for 1882’s decisive Anglo-Egyptian war battle at Tel-El-Kebir.


Unfortunately, Geoff's history lesson comes to an abrupt halt as we hit his paywall:

A short par 3 eighth did not exist until Willie Fernie remodeled Troon sometime in 1907-09. Although later accounts describe a one-shot hole playing left of today’s eighth green and in a hollow still used as a winter-time green at Troon, there is no concrete evidence it ever existed. But it’s also possible Fernie created such a hole and then moved the green over to today’s spot.

The long and the short of it is that these historic links developed without the benefit of detailed records, adding to it's charm.

Geoff's homage to wee threes is worth your time, but also represents unfinished business for your humble blogger.  I've long wanted to do a post on short threes, the ninth at Lytham being the prototype of the genre to my mind.  

A Sighting - We'll see how this one goes:

British Open 2024: Tiger Woods arrives in Scotland, tours Royal Troon for the first time in 20 years

Tiger Woods arrived at Royal Troon on Sunday to begin preparations for the British Open after missing the championship that he’s won three times in two of the past three years. He missed the cut in 2022 at the Old Course in St. Andrews.

The British winner in 2000, 2005 and 2006, Woods hasn’t played an Open at Royal Troon since 2004, when he shot 70-71-68-72 to tie for ninth place, seven shots out of a playoff between Ernie Els and eventual winner Todd Hamilton. Woods tied for 24th place at the Open at Troon in 1997. He was injured in 2016 and did not play at Troon when Henrik Stenson outdueled Phil Mickelson during the final round.

For the Tiger dead-enders, the best news might be that he played a full eighteen on Sunday.   That said, he can't be loving the weather forecast.

That said, I wouldn't expect too much from the guy.  As you might have heard, Monty stuck his nose into Tiger's business, though I think the outcome is still TBD:

Question:  Hw many people does a barbecued Monty feed?

Answer: All of them.

But is that an accurate take?

“I’ll play as long as I can play and I feel like I can still win the event,” he said.

Asked if his belief that he can still do so has wavered, Woods said simply, “No.”

And he stared stone-faced at the questioner. No more words were needed.

The very next questioner got straight to the point and asked Woods, a three-time British Open champion, about what Montgomerie, who grew up a stone’s throw from Royal Troon but never won the Claret Jug, had said and he didn’t hold back. “Well, as a past champion, I’m exempt until I’m 60. Colin’s not. He’s not a past champion, so he’s not exempt. So he doesn’t get the opportunity to make that decision. I do.”

The questioner asked, “You feel like you’ve earned that? You deserve that?”

Woods ignored the question and simply continued piling on Montgomerie. “So when I get to his age, I get to still make that decision, where he doesn’t.”

Woods smirked in delight.

Monty isn't wise to wade in here, but he's also not wrong.  It's easy for Tiger to take on Monty, but punching down like that is really beneath him.

I don't know of a comparable, but the age 60 limitation is all well and good, but doesn't contemplate a player unable to walk the golf course.  Maybe Tiger is getting stronger, so we'll see how the week goes, but I do think this is a legitimate issue once his exemptions from the 2019 Masters expire (and I think tis event is likely it). 

As we've learned again and again, Tiger takes care of Tiger.  His watch includes those tiny fields at the money grabs to placate his buddies, as well the PIP program and those massive equity grants.  Are the Tour Rabbits paying attention, or are they still such fanboys that they don't see how he's selling them down the river?

But at least he'll be providing leadership at Bethpage, right?  Funny how he has time for the gym and Troon, but not for that....

Seer you later in the week.


Monday, July 15, 2024

Weekend Wrap - Bob From Oban Edition

Hope everyone had a good weekend despite the heat.  Judging from the prevalence of ski caps in East Lothian, I may have reevaluate my packing list....

Heartache Begets Joy - CBS is so bad at the televised golf thing that you'd think there would be no new outrages in that regard, although yesterday's golf coverage for "breaking news", the second of which included a propped-up cadaver.... The only folks in America with lower ratings than golf broadcasts, so the reader can insert his own jokes.

But while we've tied ourselves up in nots as to what we want from professional golf, one Robert MacIntyre of Oban, Scotland was very clear as to his own desires....  he wanted merely to win his national open, even after having it cruelly snatched from his grasp a year ago:

A terrible silence hung over the 18th green at the Genesis Scottish Open for what felt like a beat too long.

Down below, Robert MacIntyre, Scotland’s native son, was staring down the final six inches of the putt of his life, a 22-foot curler that required just enough dying speed to avoid missing the hole altogether. He was willing it toward the cup with every ounce of his being, but every passing instant of quiet seemed to imperil it further.

No 22-footer could take that long to reach the hole — not even a putt at dying speed on these slow Scottish greens. Bob knew it, the few thousand ringed around the 18th green knew it, everybody knew it. So the quiet grew more painful, because it meant the putt of MacIntyre’s life had missed.

“I thought it was half-a-hole short,” he admitted later. “I thought it was running out of legs…”

But MacIntyre’s putt was not short.

“It was just perfect.”

It sure looked like he babied it, and that he'd be headed back to the 18th tee with Adam Scott.  Now, about that hideous shirt.....  I guess there aren't too many men's clothng stores in Oban, eh?

So perfect that it fell in — and then, mercifully, the silence lifted.

It is tempting to describe the noise that followed Bob MacIntyre’s Scottish Open-winning putt as a roar, but the truth is that it was not a roar, it was a release. The people who cheered MacIntyre were not screaming but heaving, belting with all the energy and catharsis of a foolish dream realized.

Perhaps the dream wasn’t all that foolish, what with the 16th-ranked player in the world hailing from the home country and coming within a hair of winning this very tournament a year ago? But how else would you describe golf’s home nation — a country of just 5.5 million — delivering the winner of their very own national open for only the second time in its history? And how else would you describe doing it like this, with all of the most rabid spectators in the world watching from off the side of the 72nd hole? Some of them, like Sahith Theegala, watching from very close, craning their necks out of the top balcony of the Renaissance clubhouse and hoping to capture a whiff of magic brewing below.

“This is the chance you wanted, take it,” MacIntyre told himself as he stood over the 22-footer. The putter felt “heavy” in his hands, he said, which were unusually steady. What happened next was a putt on the outside right edge that bent both ways, slowed down as it neared the hole … and fell.

What a thing for a small country that might have nurtured our great game, but certainly hasn't enjoy much success in it since the 19th century.

To this observer, the key moment wasn't that final putt, but rather this unusual use of the rules:

With Adam Scott pacing the field two shots ahead, MacIntyre needed to make something happen
— and the par-5 16th represented his best remaining chance. If he didn’t gain ground on Scott at

the final par-5, his chances of winning the title he craved most of all were next to zero.

Once MacIntyre located his ball off the fairway, thing didn’t look promising. His ball was buried in the thick fescue, and he could hardly manage to make a backswing.

“I’m shouting and I’m swearing when I’m getting up to the ball because I know that that’s my chance to really make birdie coming in,” MacIntrye said. “I got over the ball, looked at it, thinking, ‘I’m in a bit of trouble here. Might manage to move it maybe a hundred yards.'”

MacIntyre took a step back to survey the situation. As he placed his Nike shoes on the ground, the break of a lifetime presented itself.

“I just heard the clunk,” MacIntyre said.

That “clunk” was the sound of metal hitting plastic. In this case, the metal was a spike protruding from the front of his Nike shoes; the plastic was a sprinkler head.

“I was like, ‘No way — I’ve got a sprinkler underneath my foot,'” MacIntyre said. “It was just a lucky break.”

Sprinkler heads in the rough?  In Scotland?  The links (and this isn't a pure links) mostly have irrigation systems by now, though many are limited to the center lines.  But this is a newer course, built in 2008 or so, and thus has irrigation throughout the course.  But, if you saw his practice swing before finding the sprinkler head, the resulting eagle is nothing short of divine intervention.  What the gods took away in 2023, they returned in 2024.

LIV Your Best Life - They tell us this is the future of golf, but I'm thinkin g that we have our politicians to cover our clown show requirements....  The header from Anadalucia is this:

Well, gee, that sounds exciting.... Tell me more about that playoff:

Shucks, if I want to see things like that, I'll just watch Rory....

Sergio seems like he dressed for the Valderrama Member Guest:

 


While this is a reasonably good example of the club-toss genre, I enjoy it most for the mirror image outfit with Sergio:

Can you feel the game growing?

Udder Stuff -  Always funny when Golf Magazine's Tour Confidential panel disses the PGA Tour by not covering their weekly event, in this case events.  They were all in on the Ryder Cup this week, not an unimportant story for sure, but with little to add:

In a surprising announcement, Keegan Bradley was named U.S. Ryder Cup captain for the 2025 event at Bethpage Black. Bradley, 38, played in two Ryder Cups (2012, 2014), has never been an assistant captain and wasn’t on the 2023 team that lost in Rome. Now that we are a few days removed from the pick, what are your thoughts? A good decision? Or could the lack of experience prove costly?

James Colgan: My thoughts are that the Americans desperately needed a big swing after Rome, and in Bradley, they took one. If I were an American fan, I’d be happy: I much prefer when my
teams take high-risk, high-upside swings. Maybe Keegs isn’t the most prepared guy for the job, but with the crowds expected at Bethpage, it might not matter.

Sean Zak: I think things are gonna get weird. At some point in 2025, Bradley will contend to win a PGA Tour event, validating all the questions about his potential as a playing captain. But I believe what Rory McIlroy said On Thursday in Scotland: “If you want to be the best captain you can be, you can’t play. And if you want to be the best player you can be, you can’t captain. It’s one or the other.” The event is too big, the requests too many, the relationships too fraught for Bradley to have an easy-breezy captaincy while being a top 20 player in the world, too. John Wood will certainly help him out. But he may end up handling a bit more than we previously imagined.

Zephyr Melton: It’s certainly unorthodox, but I can appreciate that the Americans are at least trying to think outside the box. I’d much prefer to see something wacky than watch them continue using a system that they haven’t had much success with. The jury is out on whether or not the pick will work out, but at least they’re showing some willingness to zig when everyone expects them to zag.

Come on, don't you think Davis Love deserves his third captaincy.  After all, he only screwed the pooch on one of them....

But Rory has been wrong on just about everything, so that was a great appeal to authority, Sean.

Rory McIlroy said the pick seemed “quite reactionary to what happened in Rome.” Do you agree? If the U.S. would have won the last Cup, would Bradley have been the pick?

Colgan: Absolutely yes. It was reactionary, but that’s what most leadership decisions are. If Tiger had been available, we’d be speaking about this captainship with much different language, but he wasn’t, and Keegan was a good choice from the rest of the field.

Zak: It was more a reaction to Tiger Woods not being available. That’s what this entire thing is about, really. If the U.S. wins in Rome, Zach Johnson probably captains the team again. He’d be considered an American hero.

Melton: Agree with what SZ said above. Tiger was always Plan A, and when he turned down the position, the pickings were slim. It was the perfect storm for an unorthodox hire.

Let me see if I have this straight.  Zach made a hash of his opportunity, proving himself incapable of controlling the money faction  and internal dissension.  But we're going to dispense with reality and consider what would have happened if they won a road game, which they haven't done since the Carter administration.  Great work, Golf Magazine!.

In the U.S. system you only get a mulligan when you mess it up and are already at the Cool Kids Table.  Sorry, Zach, you're not one of those cool kids.

In his introductory press conference, Bradley said he “didn’t have one conversation with anybody about this until I was told I was the captain.” Were you surprised by that? What can we take away from that comment?

Colgan: Uhh, yeah, you should probably interview for the most important job in American golf before you’re hired. But there’s not much Keegan would say about the Ryder Cup behind closed doors that he hasn’t already said publicly. I imagine that helped the U.S. side feel some comfort.

Zak: I was stunned by that admission. 1. That it was genuine. We love a Ryder Cup captain — a role that requires a lot of answering questions — who isn’t afraid to tell the truth. 2. I think it shows just how little connection the younger generation of American golfers (read: JT, Spieth, et all) have with the generation that preceded them (read: Cink, Kuchar, et al). Thomas said all he wants is a captain the team would be excited to play for. That he couldn’t see that in the Cink and Kuchar types tells you players of his generation want a bit more than just a longtime Tour pro with a bit of success.

Melton: That was very shocking and a bit concerning. You would hope he would’ve gone through an interview process before getting the nod. Let’s hope the lack of a vetting process doesn’t come back to bite the Americans.

You mean he didn't get the proctological exam that guys like Hal Sutton and Corey Pavin received?  

But why was the last second substitution required?  Because a certain guy did his Hamlet impression and considers himself too indispensable to help out when actually needed.  In a perfect world, I'd love to see the PGA of America tell him that, since he wasn't there when needed, that they'll get by without him.  More likely, though, he'll take the Adare Manor gig, and we can only hope for a repeat of Paris and Rome.  Usually I wait for our guys to act like a******es before rooting for the Euros, but I'm already on their side for 2027.

Bradley wasn’t that far from making the team last year, and at 19th in the World Ranking it wouldn’t be surprising if he qualified via points (he said he would not use a captain’s pick on himself). Since Bradley is still competitive, though, it’s more likely than previous Ryder Cups that the captain could actually play as well. But could that situation hinder the team? Or would Bradley either not play or simply give up the captaincy to an assistant?

Colgan: I think Bradley would serve his country well by either being captain or playing in the Cup, not both. How funny would it be if, after all this hubbub, he made the team and handed the captainship off to Tiger Woods?

Zak: Would love that result, James. Imagine Tiger would, too. Like I wrote above, I do envision things getting weird next year at some point. Bradley winning in the spring or early summer months is not a wild idea, but it’s exactly the kind of thing that would give him a ton of points and make the team-building situation a bit awkward.

Melton: A first-time captain also playing in the event doesn’t seem like a recipe for success, but stranger things have happened. I don’t expect Keegan to make the team, though, so this scenario should remain a hypothetical.

Because doing it the same old way has gotten us such great captains and results?

It’s no secret the job was Tiger Woods’ if he wanted it, but Woods decided he couldn’t fully commit to the position while also managing his other obligations. When do you expect Woods to take his turn?

Colgan: I think Adare Manor in ‘27 is a very likely spot for Tiger. Captaining the Ryder Cup at the site of good friend JP McManus’ magnum opus would be good optics for Woods, and leading the U.S. into its attempt for the first win on European soil in four decades would be … epic.

Zak: Yes, Ireland in ‘27 makes good sense. He was playing captain in an important road victory in the Presidents Cup. We know he enjoys the idea of tactical missions. Winning a road Cup would be among the best stamps he could make on an average Ryder Cup career.

Melton: Agreed it would be epic, but I’d hate to see Tiger’s captaincy end in another U.S. loss on European soil. I’d much prefer him to wait until 2029 so he can lead an American triumph on home turf.

I'd be surprised to see him take the road game for that very reason, but am I the only one wondering whether money might change hands there? 

Open Week - Won't have time to go deep, but the TC gang had one query:

Next up, the final men’s major of the year, the Open Championship at Royal Troon. It’s the 10th time Troon has hosted an Open, with the most recent playing back in 2016 when Henrik Stenson outdueled Phil Mickelson. Is Rory McIlroy’s first major coming off his U.S. Open heartbreak the biggest storyline of the week? If not, what is?

Colgan: There’s no bigger story in the sport right now than Rory’s return, but here are two others that have piqued my interest: Bryson’s push for the best major season of his life, and Scottie Scheffler’s attempt to close out a historic season with his first major win away from Augusta. It’s a good week to have a good week.

Zak: I love the last major of the year. And not just because I’m a part-time Scot. But mostly because there have been three different major winners this year, which means each of them gets the chance to be the double-major winner of 2024. It’s been six years since we had a single player win two majors in the men’s game, and we’ve got a great crop of contenders between Scottie, Xander and Bryson.

Melton: My colleagues have done a great job outlining the main storylines above, so I’ll go in a different direction. I’ll be interested to see the form of Jon Rahm. His first season on LIV has seen the Spaniard have a disappointing major season thus far. But all of that would be forgotten with a win at Royal Troon.

Rory has become  far too tedious for my taste, but I agree that Rahmbo has been enigmatic.  

I'm mostly depressed that one week from toady I'll be facing eight months of golf without consequences....And it's not like I can watch much baseball these days.

Three players have already won majors this year: Scottie Scheffler, Xander Schauffele and Bryson DeChambeau. Without a win at Troon, which pro might walk away from the 2024 major season the most disappointed?

Colgan: Obviously Rory is the clear answer, but how about Collin Morikawa, whose game has been probably second-best in the world over the last 6 months, and who has only a handful of top-5s to show for it?

Zak: Yes, James nailed the top two answers here. Most people think Rory is the clear answer for disappointment because he’ll be a clear 10 years removed from his last major win, but it’s not about the 10 years for me anymore. It’s about another year of top-3-in-the-world golf without it punching through in the four events that matter most. It’ll be another year of three impressive wins (Dubai, Zurich, and Quail Hollow) and zero massive wins. Such incredible golf but not the kind that he wants most. That’s the tantalizing kind of disappointment.

Melton: How about Brooks Koepka? After a PGA win in 2023, he looked like he was back to being the baddest dude in golf, but this year he’s yet to even register a top 25 in the majors. For someone who only cares about the four big ones, being uncompetitive for an entire season has to sting.

Yeah, Koepka's had an odd season, but Sean Zak seems not to understand that Rory playing his best when it means the most is on brand.

We'll have more on Troon as the week progresses.