Ryder Cup Tuesday

Can you feel that intensity gradually rising?  Seems an eternity until Friday, no?

The Chemistry Thing - They have it and we don't, but is that an adequate explanation for losing nine out of twelve?

Ryder Cup 2021: With eyes on Bryson-Brooks feud, how much does team chemistry matter?

The Europeans have it, the Americans don’t. That is the oversimplified, surface-level, talking-head take on Ryder Cup team chemistry, an opinion aired when trying to explain why the U.S.

has underperformed for the better part of two decades while Europe’s sum is continually greater than its parts. Those in and around both teams will tell you those sentiments are not entirely true: The Americans are not plagued by eternal dysfunction, and the Europeans are not the merry band of brothers they are made out to be. One does not need to be an insider to realize this conjecture is not wrong, either, particularly on the American side. A good team culture does not beget task forces and back-stabs.

The matter of chemistry is especially tantalizing at Whistling Straits, as it converges—maybe the better word is collides—with the overriding storyline of the season: the feud of one Brooks Koepka and Bryson DeChambeau. The two have said their feelings toward each other will not interfere with the team dynamic, captain Steve Stricker even reportedly getting personal assurances. Of course, they also said their feud was once over and we’ve seen how that song and dance has played out. To think it won’t be hovering over the proceedings like a storm drifting in off Lake Michigan is to be blissfully obtuse.

All leading to this imponderable:

So what weight does team chemistry have at the Ryder Cup?

Which he answers by going to two bit players whose experience is dated at best (as is the accompanying photo above):

“I think it plays to it, in some part,” says Justin Leonard, who appeared on two winning U.S. Ryder Cup teams. “I haven’t been in those team rooms since 2008. But I can tell you in the Ryder Cups that I did play, we had very good chemistry and you come together really quickly.”

Adds Paul Lawrie, who played in two Ryder Cups and served as a vice captain for Team Europe in 2016. “There are so many points up for grabs in the four-balls and foursomes that pairings and the relationships between players is very important.”

Maybe the relationship between the pairs that actually play together, although that might not even apply to fourballs... But wait, it gets even weirder, because the sine qua non of European chemistry attributes that chemistry to....well, individuality:

Paul McGinley competed on three Ryder Cup winning squads as a player and navigated Team Europe to victory in 2014 as a captain. When he was at the helm, McGinley understood this dynamic of the individual and competitor. Which is why he didn’t alter it but embraced it.

“I let them be 12 individuals rather than a team,” McGinley says. “We had this massive quote ‘The best teamwork comes from men who are working independently toward one goal in unison.’”

McGinley achieved this by allowing the players to bring their own ecosystems with them. For example, Viktor Dubuisson had three friends who followed the Frenchman wherever he went, providing the social support Dubuisson leaned on throughout the year. That’s the antithesis of most Ryder Cup environments, where team and event organizers keep players on a tight, strict schedule that’s a departure from their usual regimen.

As that picture above hints, the article will ultimately devolve into an ode to Captain Azinger and the wonder of pods:

A member of four Ryder Cup teams as a player, Azinger then led the team in 2008 in a captaincy

viewed as the paragon of American leadership this century. He did it, in part, by realizing his old-school insights into the biennial match may not be shared by his team. So Azinger introduced the pod system at Valhalla in 2008, putting four players in the same group to foster unity in a relatively small group.

Three three-man pods were generated from eight automatic bids, with captain’s pick Steve Stricker rounding out the list. Azinger organized those groups according to personality, with each pod picking the fourth player to fill out their group to match their vibe.

“My hope was to give ownership to the players and boost chemistry,” Azinger explained. “Whether you were picking your fourth or being picked as the fourth, I wanted guys engaged and ready to run through a wall for their teammates. I think the real key was that I communicated to the players according to their personality types. From that point on, it was up to the players.”

Mebbe, but the lesson to me of 2008 has always been much simpler.  The absence of the albatross named Eldrick allowed the U.S. team to play underdogs, resulting in Boo Weekly and J.B. Holmes putting like Bobby Locke all week, which is usually the providence of the Euros.  Oh and it doesn't hurt to have Nick Faldo helming the opposition...

Amusingly, despite using the Brooksie-Bryson manspat as a header framing device, CTRL:F-Koepka yields all of one result (well, two, if you include the photo caption).   ESPN's Bob Harig comes at the issue head-on:

Can the U.S. Ryder Cup team get along for one week?

If Joel Beall's choice of experts was amusing, Harig's go-to source is likely to cause a spit take:

The long-time narrative is once again in play: Can the U.S. put aside any so-called differences, bond as a team as Europe has seemingly done, and prevail?

Does any of it even matter?

"Honestly, at the end of the day, the captains and assistants will take care of all that,'' said Patrick Reed, who was asked about the controversy before his own issues surfaced that caused him to miss out on a captain's pick. "It's 12 going out there and playing golf. Whether they can't stand each other, whether they like each other, whatever it actually is, they don't want to lose a point because of stuff like that.

"They're not going to let it bother them. They're going to go out and play, and play the best they can and try to bring the Cup home.''

It's hard to find a better expert on team harmony than PReed for sure, a man so toxic that he had Captain Stricker rooting for the bilateral pneumonia...

Though Harig does ultimately get to another niggling little detail, to wit, that there are several undercard tiffs to watch as well:

He divided his team into three pods of four players each, and the pairings all came from that. The U.S. has varied from that approach at times, but has used versions of it in recent years. Look for Koepka and DeChambeau to be in separate pods.

There were reports that Brooksie and BFF Dj had to be physically separated in the Euro team room on Sunday night in Paris...

For what it's worth, there is this report that one of the combatants wants to sue for peace:

The feud between Brooks Koepka and Bryson DeChambeau has been one of golf's biggest storylines all year—not to mention one of the most interesting subplots entering this week's Ryder Cup. But Bryson wants to put it behind him once and for all, according to his longtime coach.

“Whether or not they are both doing it to maximise their global profile, Bryson wants it over,” Mike Schy told the Irish Times on Monday. “Move on. The bottom line is two big egos.”

Hey, Mike, there's $40 million large of PIP money to be had. 

Of course he wants it over, as he's had a miserable time out there recently with all the heckling.  But riddle me this, Batman?  Given that a signature moment of their petty feud came when Bryson attempted to deliver a message to Brooks through his caddie, I'm guessing that this trial balloon will garner a similar reaction.

The History Thing - Lots of Ryder Cup moments being recycled, starting with this one:

The 15 most consequential moments in Ryder Cup history

It also appears that the format of the text precludes cutting and pasting, so you're on your own.  I was going to excerpt No. 12, but can link you to this piece instead:

When Samuel Ryder turned 50, he didn’t join the senior tour because there was no senior tour, or any other organized professional tour, this being 1908. No, the Englishman picked up golf in

middle age not for a long-repressed passion for the sport but rather for his health, to get some fresh air and exercise, as his friend, a preacher and golf enthusiast, had suggested.

Financing his new hobby wasn’t a problem. Though Ryder grew up without great means, he’d found his way into prosperity. One of eight children of a gardener father and a dressmaker mother, he was on course to become a teacher — he’d even taught Sunday school as a youth — but ill health led him to drop out of college before graduating. This proved fortuitous, at least financially, as did having a falling out with his dad. In combination, these events led him to move to London to join a seed merchant firm and then to start his own company in St. Albans selling mail order “penny packets” of seed, at one cent each, from his house. Make a fortune from the comfort of home: Ryder was ahead of his time.

Ryder is on the left in the photo, with Abe Mitchell, his instructor on the right.  The figure on the Cup is a likeness of Mitchell.

I was also going to excerpt No. 11, a curious bit of Task Force triumphalism that seems to strange with the passage of time.  I get that everyone was happy to jump on the Phil-inspired hostile takeover in the glow of the 2016 victory, but didn't 2018 rain on that parade?  The very guys to whom we gave the keys folded like a cheap suitcase.  Just sayin'.

But was that Reed-Rory match consequential in any sense?  I mean, there's a reason that the item specifies the 8th green , because that's where the match peaked.  After that, Rory basically folded like a...what's that expression< a cheap suitcase....  So, consequential for Rory who was trying to avenge his Masters Sunday no-show, but for the event?  

This offering is more in our wheelhouse for sure:

‘He still couldn’t beat me’: The 15 most controversial moments in Ryder Cup history

A couple of amusing equipment-related bits form the Wayback Machine, just to remind folks that, Jack and Tony notwithstanding, there's always been a chippiness to these matches:

STICKING IT TO THE YANKS: MOORTOWN GOLF COURSE IN 1929

Talk about giving the others guys the shaft. By 1929, the USGA had approved the use of steel shafts in competition. But the R&A had yet to do so. So, when the Americans showed up on English soil steeled, as it were, for battle, their opponents made it clear: steel-shafted clubs were a no-no. The Americans went back to their old equipment, and Great Britain went on to victory.

GETTING IN THE GROOVES: PORTLAND GOLF COURSE IN 1947

Compared to some of the testy exchanges we hear about today, this one comes off as throwback quaint. Rest assured, though, playing captain Ben Hogan and his team were far from pleased when Great Britain captain Henry Cotton called for an inspection of the grooves on the irons used by the opposition. This was just before the competition started. By the time it ended, the Americans had delivered an 11-1 whooping. Oh, and by the way, their grooves were deemed legal.

Interesting in the context of Bobby Jones' 1930 Impregnable Quadrilateral, in which he used hickory shafts in all four events.

Zinger shows up more than once, and many will think we could use a few of his ilk the4se days.  But here's the one that pays off the header:

NICK FALDO VS. PAUL AZINGER: THE BELFRY IN 1993

A rivalry born at the 1987 British Open at Muirfield, where Faldo bested Azinger by a single

stroke, took on a fiery new dimension at the Belfry, where the two men met in the final singles match on Sunday. Both were at their icy best. After Faldo aced the par-3 14th to go 1 up, Azinger responded with a birdie on the next. But Faldo had regained a 1-up lead as the match moved to the 18th green. Faldo made par, leaving Azinger with a six-foot birdie bid for the halve. Though team USA had already clinched the Cup, Faldo declined to concede the putt. Azinger drained it. Not long after, he would begin treatment for melanoma, which he survived, competitive spirit intact. “Look at that,” he would say, two years later, while reviewing tape of his singles match with Faldo. “I had cancer and he still couldn’t beat me.”

This one is obligatory, though the factual error is a bit off-putting:

THE STAMPEDE: THE COUNTRY CLUB IN 1999

A day that began with an egregious fashion faux pas (what were they thinking with those shirts?) ended with an even more sensational offense. Having scratched back from 4 down to all square in

his singles match against Jose Maria Olazabal, Justin Leonard faced a 45-foot putt birdie on the 17th green. Back went his blade, and off rolled his ball, over a swale and down into the cup, a birdie bomb that triggered a stampede of U.S. players and their wives (as well as TV cameramen) onto the green — all before Olazabal had a chance to attempt his own putt to extend the match. In the wake of the euphoria, the Europeans put on their own demonstration. They made it pretty clear they were aghast.

If Josh took a moment to Google the event's results, he'd be shocked to find that Leonard and Olazabal halved their match.  Olazabal's putt was not to extend the match, it was to halve the hole and thereby keep the match all-square.  In going one up with one to play, Leonard guaranteed the half-point that put the Americans at the magic number of 14 1/2.

 And this obvious walk down memory lane:

CATCHING HAL: OAKLAND HILLS COUNTRY CLUB IN 2004

Hindsight is 20/20. And its steely eyes stared holes in U.S. captain Hal Sutton, who caught after-

the-fact flack for his decision to pair Phil Mickelson and Tiger Woods in both matches on Friday. The duo came away with exactly zero points. To Sutton’s critics, the captain should have seen that the partnership was doomed from the beginning, since the two stars, for all their celebrated talent, were also famous for not getting along. As time wore on, Phil and Tiger forged something of a friendship. But Sutton’s decision proved a stubborn source of friction, sparking headlines more than a decade later as another Ryder Cup approached (more on that below).

There were some great moments form that fiasco, none better than the two of them standing on opposite sides of the first tee box (though the photo of Tiger standing where Phil's 18th hole tee shot went OB comes close), but to me the better point is that pairing the two guys that couldn't stand each other was only the second stupidest thing Hal did that week.

One last bit of history before we move on.  Before there was Seve and before there was Poults, there was this guy:

Plenty are those of a (contemporary) European persuasion who will insist the inspirational figure of Ian Poulter is the ultimate “Mr. Ryder Cup.” And they would not be wrong, given the

Englishman’s already legendary propensity for heroics—see Medinah, 2012—in golf’s biggest biennial battle. But they would not be completely right, either. That tribute and unofficial title was originally given to another, a man who played in nine Ryder Cups, captained the then Great Britain & Ireland team on five occasions and was good enough to go head-to-head in singles with major champions Byron Nelson, Jay Hebert, Doug Ford and Ed Furgol—and beat all four.

Dai Rees has been gone for nearly 40 years, but his memory deserves recognition beyond reference in dusty history books. No one has ever displayed more enthusiasm for the Ryder Cup than the wee Welshman who was also three times a runner-up in the Open Championship. You had to be way better than good to beat him. All-time greats Ben Hogan (1953), Peter Thomson (1954) and Arnold Palmer (1961) were the men who most cruelly denied Rees his biggest lifetime ambition. Which is not to say that 1946 at St. Andrews, where he shot 80 in the final round when 74 would have won the claret jug, was not most painful.

Give it a read if you're unfamiliar with the man's body of work.

About Those Pairings -  Josh Berhow is reading tee leaves, using the media schedule as a window into possible pods/pairings:

TUESDAY

U.S.: Justin Thomas, Jordan Spieth, Bryson DeChambeau, Scottie Scheffler

Europe: Rory McIlroy, Viktor Hovland, Lee Westwood, Sergio Garcia

WEDNESDAY

U.S.: Xander Schauffele, Patrick Cantlay, Dustin Johnson, Collin Morikawa

Europe: Ian Poulter, Shane Lowry, Tommy Fleetwood, Bernd Wiesberger

THURSDAY

U.S.: Brooks Koepka, Tony Finau, Daniel Berger, Harris English

Europe: Paul Casey, Matt Fitzpatrick, Tyrrell Hatton, Jon Rahm

You could certainly see where some of those, Spieth-J.T. and X-man Cantlay, are likely to happen.

More interesting might be guys like DJ.  On the one hand his game and personality should be suitable for either format with almost anybody.  On the flip side, he hasn't been playing very well and hasn't ever been a factor in the event....

On the Euro side, the affinity pairings of Rory-Lowry and Rahmbo-Sergio don't fit in this model.

Dylan Dethier takes his own shot at it for the Yanks in his Monday Finish column:

POD 1

Justin Thomas

Jordan Spieth

Brooks Koepka

Daniel Berger

POD 2

Patrick Cantlay

Xander Schauffele

Dustin Johnson

Collin Morikawa

POD 3

Harris English

Bryson DeChambeau

Tony Finau

Scottie Scheffler

Interesting that they both happened upon that DJ-Morikawa pairing, which one assumes means that they're both wrong.  I've heard English thrown out as a possible pairing for Bryson, though mostly because English isn't of sufficient stature to be choosy.

But let me just say that I love the Finau-Scheffler pairing, especially in foursomes.  No issue with them in fourball, as they both make plenty of birdies, but those guys both need to play both sessions of foursomes, whether or not in each others' company.

I shall leave you here and pick up these themes over the next few days. 

Weekend Wrap - Ryder Cup Preview Edition

A tough day to get started at the keyboard.  Sure, there's too much to cover and a challenge to logically organize, but the bigger issue is two hyper-kinetic kitties to whom attention must be paid...

Mad Max - I was modestly intrigued to see if Maverick McNelly, often better known as Mr. Danielle Kang, could get it done (though his father is also somewhat prominent).  The answer, alas, was "no":

Who won: Max Homa (seven-under 65, 19 under overall)

How it happened: McNealy was three under on the front on Sunday and turned in 17 under overall, enough for a two-shot lead over Marc Leishman, who shot 65, and a group of others stuck at 14

under. Max Homa took a big bite into the lead with a hole-out eagle on 12 to get within a stroke, and his birdie on 13 — he drained a 21-footer — tied him at the top. As McNealy couldn’t do any better than pars to start his back nine, Homa took the lead on the par-5 16th, two-putting for birdie and getting to 18 under. McNealy tied Homa with his own birdie on 16, but it didn’t last long. On the 17th, Homa rolled in a big breaking right-to-left putt to regain the solo lead at 19 under. Minutes later, a wayward drive on 17 led to a disastrous double bogey for McNealy. His approach from 189 yards missed the green, and he two-chipped and two-putted for a 6. That gave Homa a three-shot lead, and his par on the 18th was plenty good enough to shut the door. Homa finished the weekend with back-to-back 65s, and his Sunday 65 was tied with Leishman for the low round of the day. McNealy drained a long eagle putt on the 72nd hole to shoot 68 and finish solo second, one behind Homa, but the double bogey came back to haunt him.

Homa's a fave of the blog, given that he has an actual sense of humor and seems mostly without affectation.  Though I give the porn 'stache a seven out of ten, and that's grading on a curve.

This is your basic twofer, wherein I can pretend to cover the season-opening event while actually previewing the event about which you might actually care:

An illness. A missed cut. Is there concern with Jon Rahm heading into Ryder Cup?

We should only be so lucky...

Or, maybe more accurately, better. On Tuesday, despite a body of work that perhaps spoke

otherwise, he learned that he had not been voted PGA Tour player of the year by his peers. On Wednesday, a day before the start of the Fortinet, he was forced to withdraw from the pro-am with a stomach illness that he said made him feel “way worse” than his bout with Covid over the summer. On Thursday, he shot a 72, on Friday, he shot a 71, and he was done, his first missed cut since May.

The only golfer of the 24 heading to next week’s Ryder Cup to play this week, Rahm will now rest and recalibrate too. Which, he says, might not be the worst thing.

If you say so...

“Well, I’ve got two more days off. I think it’s primarily rest,” Rahm said. “I just, you know, I feel like with having those stomach issues early, I wasn’t nearly as rested as I could have been, my body got a little bit tight, but I’m feeling good today. It was a tough course out there.

“If anything, I get to rest a couple extra days and be able to figure out what’s going on with my swing, which technically is not really anything bad. It’s just I think a lot of those swings were made to look worse because of how tough it is out there. It’s firm, it’s fast, the fairways are hard to hit. I just maybe didn’t hit the shot sometimes. I just feel I could have been rewarded a little bit more, that’s about it.”

He seems quite pleased with his extra two days of leisure, but wouldn't four have been better?

Best guess is it'll prove to mean exactly nothing, but given his outsized importance to the Euros, they'll be watching him closely the next few days.

Ryder Cup Fever - So much to cover and so little time...  Shall we start with our nightmare?

Team Europe’s greatest villain is back at the Ryder Cup … because of course he is

I can't even fathom a guess as to whom they're referring....

What is it about this guy?

Other players in plaid—Arnold Palmer in his day, Darren Clarke in his, Rodney Dangerfield for 100 minutes—it works. It’s cool. Ian Poulter in plaid is annoying.

Ian Poulter in anything is annoying. It’s a backdoor compliment.

Here’s the starting point: He’s been a constant in our golf-watching lives for about 20 years now, at all our sparkly events, most especially the Ryder Cup. If he weren’t good, would we care so much about him? We would not.

He’s spectacularly English. The working Englishman who made it. He’s as Jaguar C-Type as Pat Reed is Ford F-150. We don’t do Jaguars, here in these United States. Ian Poulter don’t care.

Poulter earned his PGA Tour playing privileges by making the 2004 European Ryder Cup team. (He’s been playing both the European Tour and the PGA Tour ever since.) Poulter sunk the winning point for his club at the ’04 Ryder Cup. In Detroit—how galling. Hal Sutton, our captain, was so impressed he almost doffed his 10-gallon lid. Poults is more of a visor guy. It’s a British thing. Poults. Tiger put it in circulation. From the Yiddish, for the guy you’d least like to see over a meaningful 10-footer to beat you.

I don't actually know if Mike Bamberger, who wrote the pice, is Jewish, though I suspect as much since he wrote this 2015 article on Jewish Golfers ( which predates yesterday's winner, Max Homa, who is of the Tribe).  But I'm pretty sure he was bluffing on that Yiddish bit:

Seems to me Poults is more of a carrier, in that he leaves us grousing...

A slight into this ultimately unsatisfying John Feinstein offering:

Ryder Cup 2021: Why a team-first mentality is so critical and so hard to adjust to

Ultimately, the best John can do is anecdotal evidence of players coming around:

More often than not, comments like Koepka’s come from players who haven’t yet experienced

the intensity and the exhilaration of a Ryder Cup week. When Rory McIlroy first qualified for Montgomerie’s 2010 European team in Wales, he was asked about how he felt knowing he’d be on the team.

“It’s nice,” he said. “I look forward to it. But being honest, it’s an exhibition. My No. 1 goal is to win major championships.”

Montgomerie, who is a lot smarter than most people think, smiled when he was asked about McIlroy’s comments. “He’ll learn,” he said. “He won’t feel that way once he gets there.”

Monty was right. “I knew about 15 minutes after I got there that I’d been wrong,” McIlroy said, able to laugh at himself years later. “I realized this was really a big deal.”

His basic premise, the coda of the piece, is that Koepka, notwithstanding his comments last week, will ultimately come around.  Fair enough, but John elides to 600-lbs. elephant in the corner, to wit, that "coming around" means something completely different for each of the two teams:  Back to that young chicken from a SiriusXM podcast:

Poulter was laughing on SiriusXM PGA Tour Radio Wednesday as he faced down the Ryder Cup question everyone has been asking. The host, Michael Breed, put it well: “It’s easy to look at the

[European] team and say you are underdogs and yet what you have is you have history. And history says we’ve won four out of the last five, seven of the last nine, and nine of the last 12.

“You know, that’s our advantage, I guess, in a way, right? That we have delivered when perhaps we shouldn’t have delivered,” Poulter mused to Breed with a chuckle. “And that is the magical question that gets asked all the time. That’s what has the American press scratching their head. That’s what has the American team scratching their heads at times, right? On paper, on paper, on paper, the U.S. team should have delivered. It’s for us to enjoy and for the American team to figure out, right?”

To hear Poulter tell it, the Europeans have been able to channel something. He might not know exactly what that something is. But he has no interest in breaking down the recipe for the flummoxed Americans, either.

One of life's enduring mysteries...  While I might have found Feinstein's piece a bit lacking, he does cite that which the Americans need to keep in mind as regards their most prominent talent:

Koepka was 3-1 for the winning U.S. team at Hazeltine National in 2016 and 1-2-1 in Europe’s win in Paris in 2018. That’s 4-3-1, certainly respectable, especially given that very few Americans who have played in this century have winning records. Tiger Woods, who never really embraced the Ryder Cup emotionally, is 13-21-3 and the eight teams he played on went 1-7. Phil Mickelson, who still hasn’t completely gotten over not being picked for Tom Watson’s team in 1993, has played in 12 Ryder Cups and is 18-22-7 individually. The teams he played on went 3-9.

 So naturally we've handed those two the keys to the U.S. Ryder Cup efforts....

This week's Tour Confidential panel is of course all over this event, including this back and forth on this specific topic:

3. In an interview on SiriusXM PGA Tour Radio last week, European stalwart Ian Poulter was amused by one topic that often comes up during Ryder Cup week, which is how the Americans are usually the favorites but are often out-played. “On paper, on paper, on paper, the U.S. team should have delivered,” he said. “It’s for us to enjoy and for the American team to figure out, right?” How does Europe seemingly come together and play better during these weeks, and why has it been so hard for the U.S. to do the same?

Piastowski: Brooks would like this answer: The underdog, me-against-the-world, chip-on-your shoulder mentality can do miracles. If the U.S. just looked at the recent ledger in this event, they might get a little of that, too.

Colgan: Nick, you’re spot on. It also helps that the Europeans putt the living daylights out of the ball.

Berhow: Could you imagine a European Ryder Cupper ever saying what Brooks Koepka did about the Ryder Cup? Never. That’s the difference.

Bamberger: I do think the Europeans actually do come together because they seem to have the ability to park their egos at the jetway when leaving for the Ryder Cup and play for Continent. That’s harder for the American golfer to do, for whatever reason. But in the end, and we’ve seen many times, the Europeans just flat-out play the Americans, particularly with mid-length and short putting. Close matches always come down to that. That’s skill, stroke, confidence, nerves, sense-of-balance in your life, and a bunch of things you cannot measure.

Sens: All of those points above are on the mark. They bring a team spirit and an underdog attitude into the event, which often allows them to play looser. But I also think the “better on paper” theme is oversold by a golf press that gets easily intoxicated by world rankings and length of the tee, neither of which are the real difference-makers in this event. Look at the European players and their Ryder Cup records. Should they really be the big underdogs that Vegas has them as this week? I don’t think so.

Josh Berhow is quite obviously wrong, as Rory's comments above are the mirror image of Brooksie's.  I've always attributed this phenomenon to the milking of underdog status, whereby the excellence of the Americans in their day job is almost a negative... Interestingly to me, Rory is the most American-like of the Euros by virtue of his individual success, and he's been a bit of a Ryder Cup dud.  It's their rank-and-file, guys like Poulter that don't actually win on their own very often, who show up at these things and play like they haven't a worry in the world.

As long as we've broken the ice on that TC panel:

1. After a one-year delay and three years since the last meeting, the 43rd Ryder Cup is officially, and finally, here, as the U.S. takes on Europe at Whistling Straits Friday to Sunday in Kohler, Wis. Europe has won seven of the past nine events, including the last one, a seven-point thumping in Paris. As usual, there are storylines aplenty, but what’s the one you can’t wait to see unfold this week?

Nick Piastowski: The Ryder Cup-iness of the Ryder Cup. We’ll all, no doubt, be looking forward

to Bryson unsheathing driver on 1, Brooks saying something spicy and Ian Poulter thumping his chest. But the fans, the chants, the ebbs and the flows are what make this event so meaningful — and we’ve had to wait a while for it, too. The fact that not many Euro supporters will make the trip is a bit of a downer. But, Wisconsin born and raised, I know how much this event means to golf in the state. It’ll be a fun one.

James Colgan: Given his match play record (0-5 across the Presidents and Ryder Cups) and headline magnetism (long-drive championships, anyone?), Bryson DeChambeau hasn’t quite given us reason for optimism. But that’s precisely why I’m excited to watch him. Bryson will face the music if he doesn’t answer the bell for the Americans, but no one stands more to gain from a brilliant week.

Josh Berhow: I want to see if Jon Rahm, likely irked by not winning PGA Tour Player of the Year, takes out his fury on the U.S. side and has a big week. I’m super interested to see whom Bryson is paired with. I can’t wait to see how Brooks performs, especially since he was recently so outspoken about his views of the event (more on that below). I’m curious if the controversy that always swirls around the U.S. team will be a thorn in its side. There’s lots more, too. Can Westwood and Poulter still bring it? What kind of an assistant captain will Phil be? There are so many great stories to unpack. It’s gonna be a blast.

Josh Sens: All good candidates above. Beyond those threads, it’s always interesting to watch how first-time Ryder Cuppers respond to the moment. The Europeans will be counting heavily on Shane Lowry and Viktor Hovland, both first-timers. As one of the straightest hitters in the game, Hovland stands to be a match-play pest, as he proved in the U.S. Amateur. And Lowry just somehow seems custom-built for an event like this. On the U.S. side, Scheffler has been so good on big stages. Will that same success carry over? And then there’s the captain’s picks element, and all the praise and second-guessing that invariably comes with it.

Michael Bamberger: Which team will win.

I'm most interested to see if Poulter's eyeballs remain in their sockets....  But, yeah, who wins as well.

And on Brooksiegate:

2. Brooks Koepka spoke candidly about his indifference for Ryder Cups in a recent interview with Golf Digest, saying things like: “There are times where I’m like, I won my match. I did my job. What do you want from me? I know how to take responsibility for the shots I hit every week. Now, somebody else hit a bad shot and left me in a bad spot, and I know this hole is a loss.” And: “It’s different. It’s hectic. It’s a bit odd, if I’m honest. I don’t want to say it’s a bad week. We’re just so individualized, and everybody has their routine and a different way of doing things.” Former Ryder Cup captain and current NBC analyst Paul Azinger chimed in, saying, “I’m not sure he loves the Ryder Cup that much. If he doesn’t love it, he should relinquish his spot and get people there who do love it.” Do you have an issue with Koepka’s comments, and what’s your take on Azinger’s rebuttal?

It's an absolute nothing burger, at least up until he starts playing poorly....

Piastowski: If Brooksie wins, if he plays like Major Brooks, he can say whatever he wants. If he wins his points, that’s all you can ask of a teammate. Not even everyone has to be Poulter. Energy can be drawn on success. However … he has all the potential to be a longtime alpha for that room. If the outspoken, four-time major champ says let’s kick butt today — but in words only Brooks could concoct — then I’d sure as hell would want to kick butt today. But if Brooksie treats this like a Tour stop in mid-July, and plays like it, Azinger is right. His record be damned, get someone in there who will be a stone-cold killer.

Colgan: Fortunately, it’s not like the U.S. side enters the Ryder Cup with massive concerns about its ability to form a cohesive unit, or else those comments could’ve come across the wrong way. Wait a second …

Berhow: I don’t have a problem with Koepka’s comments, because we want our athletes to be honest and outspoken, but I’m also not Steve Stricker, who probably wasn’t thrilled to read it. As for Azinger, I get why he’s bothered by it, but I do think once the lights go on, Koepka will perform as best he can. (He’s 4-3-1 in it.) There’s pride on the line once golf balls go in the air.

Bamberger: I think Brooks spoke truthfully, and for himself. Azinger did the same. Brooks is playing. Azinger is offering commentary. The system at work.

Sens: Like Berhow, I appreciate Koepka’s honesty. But I also understand why Azinger is irked by a guy who isn’t all-in on everything the Ryder Cup is about, because Azinger lives and breathes the stuff. I have no doubt that Koepka will play his heart out on his own ball. But is he the ideal guy to have as your partner or in the team room? Doesn’t sound like it. If he hadn’t auto-qualified, I wouldn’t pick him.

I just add this to the list of evidence that Brooks isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer.  The comments to me just seem profoundly silly, reflecting a man completely absorbed with his own little bubble.  To some extent that's a necessary thing for their careers, but missing from his comments was any sense that he would embrace the week of team competition.  That's what drew the rebuke from Zinger, though Mike's assessment that the system is working seems odd.  Zinger can't have helped the home team by fanning these flames, and they'll be further fanned if Koepka gets off to a rocky start.

Of course his bête noire Bryson has done a similar thing, though in a completely different manner.  In announcing plans to compete in a Long Drive event the day after the Ryder Cup ends, he's pretty much announced that he's not overly invested in this little exhibition on the shores of Lake Michigan.  For a guy struggling with the way fans are treating him, this pretty much ensures a continuation of that, unless he emerges as a Ryder Cup hero by Sunday.  All I can add is that he better chip and putt well, because he's announced that he's destroyed his hands in pursuit of the long ball...  If his objectives was to induce more fan abuse, what would he have done differently?

4. Three years ago, it was Francesco Molinari and Tommy Fleetwood who stole the show, leading Europe to an easy win. Which player will be the most crucial to each team’s success this time around?

Piastowski: On the American side, I’m going with Patrick Cantlay. He gives off a match play-winning vibe to me. Go out, win 4 and 3, rinse and repeat. Patty Ice, for sure. For the Euros, let’s go with Viktor Hovland. Is he this event’s next big thing for the team across the pond? He has all the talent in the world to be.

Colgan: For the Europeans, I think it has to be Jon Rahm. How does the best player in the world follow up a killer performance in ’18 as a Ryder Cup rookie? For the U.S., it’s the guy most likely to follow in Rahm’s footsteps: Collin Morikawa. He was gassed leading into the Tour Championship, but would seem to enter Whistling refreshed after a few weeks off.

Berhow: Jordan Spieth is now a veteran, seasoned Ryder Cupper. He’s the heart and soul of that team and needs to play like it. I think he will. As for Europe, I’m expecting a big week from Jon Rahm. The big-time players have to show up.

Bamberger: That steal-the-show thing comes on Friday and Saturday, when you’re playing with another player. On Sunday, you’re grinding out a point. I’m guessing Sergio and Rahm will be put together, they’ll produce some magic in a Spanish tradition we all know well, and that could steal the show. You can have only one star act, so I’m going to leave it at that.

Sens: I’m thinking Shane Lowry for the Europeans. The guy just has the air of a Ryder Cup bulldog. Paired with Rory, I expect him to be especially dangerous. On the U.S. team, I look for Xander to eat this stuff up.

It's hard to imagine this being competitive without Jon Rahm playing like a stud...  Hovland and Lowry are guys that have to pitch in, but you could say that about all twelve guys.  One guy whose name I've yet to read is Paul Casey, who would seem to need to have a heck of a week, no?

Josh Berhow, however, isn't having much of a week, though.  In addition to that call-out above, he's touting a man whose extensive cup experience includes an 0-6 record in singles.  Maybe he'll come through, but I'm far more curious to see how Stricker will use him.  For instance, that electric, first tee moment Friday morning should, methinks, not include our Jordan, who should sit in both foursomes sessions.

They do a get a litle silly asking the same question repeatedly:

5. There will be nine first-time Ryder Cup players this week. The U.S. has six in Collin Morikawa, Patrick Cantlay, Xander Schauffele, Harris English, Scottie Scheffler and Daniel Berger, while Europe has just half that many in Shane Lowry, Bernd Wiesberger and Viktor Hovland. Which one of these nine will be the most impactful?

Piastowski: Whoops, I kind of answered this above. But I’ll toss in another: Shane Lowry. The 34-year-old is obviously a “rookie” in name alone. The Open Championship winner told his team three years ago he wanted to be at this event, and here he is. I think that’s the kind of spirit Azinger was talking about above. Lowry is great — but you get the feeling he’ll play above his head this week and be even greater.

Colgan: Xander!! We’ve heard legends about his match play ability in money games against fellow pros, and we saw him win a gold medal representing the U.S. in July. There may be no rookie more prime to make himself a hero.

Berhow: Patrick Cantlay has been on a tear the past two months and was 3-2 at the last Presidents Cup. He’s gonna have himself a week.

Bamberger: Bernd Wiesberger. Isn’t it obvious? The most impactful player is often the one you expect the least impact from. In this nine-person subset of the 24 players, Bernd’s the leader in the house by a touchdown.

Sens: At this point, they get talked about in tandem so often we should really have just one name for Brooks and Bryson, kinda like Brangelina. Combined, they are going to have a massive impact on the U.S. team. What kind of impact is the big question.

Thank God for Mike Bamberger keeping it at least a little interesting.  Cantlay, X-Man and Lowry might technically be rookies, but we certainly don't expect them to spit the bit.  

I'm not sure about the premise of this question

6. With Patrick Reed left off the U.S. team, it begs the question: Who on the U.S. will play the ever-important role of opponent irritator and crowd ignitor? And who will that be for Europe?

Piastowski: It’s a tough question for the U.S. side — few on this team have done something like that before, and it may take them out of their comfort zone if they tried. Spieth would be an obvious answer, but man, I’d love to see Morikawa stuff iron after iron and work the crowd along the way. He can certainly do the former. For the Europeans, it’s more a question who won’t be this guy. But it’d be a blast to see Tyrrell Hatton go on a birdie binge and go nuclear on the crowd.

Colgan: It’s Ian Poulter for Europe. It’s always Ian Poulter. For the Americans, how about Brooks Koepka? He certainly has the mentality for it.

Berhow: Not everyone can play that role (sorry, Harris English), but Justin Thomas is a good fit, and I also think he wants to be that guy who can get a point, be a leader and put the team on his back. As for Europe, it’s Poulter, with Hatton waiting in the wings.

Bamberger: Sorry, maybe I missed something: Is Bryson DeChambeau not playing in this Ryder Cup? Bryson DeChambeau. He’ll irritate and ignite American fans, any European fans who will be there, European players, his own teammates. It’s his special talent, or one of them. As for the Europeans, you have to go back to the well: Ian Poulter. It’s his eyeballs. They speak a language all their own.

Sens: Poulter is a Hall of Fame irritant for sure. But let’s not forget Sergio, who has played that same role throughout the years (and who has been flashing some pretty tidy form of late). Michael’s right that Bryson will be the most polarizing on the U.S. side. But the guy best suited to fire up the crowd is Spieth. It’s all about those backbreaking putts in the Ryder Cup, and no one makes more big ones than he does.

That's quite the Rorschach test of answers, so let's take them one by one?  Do the Americans need an irritant?  I would argue the negative, they just need twelve guys to play like they do week in and week out.  Trust me, that'll annoy the Euros sufficiently...

For the Euros, in their capacity as perennial underdogs, they need to see that they can stay with the superior team (on paper, as per IJP).  But the original Poulter was Seve, who was the ultimate irritant up until the moment when the magic died.  That's the risk for the Euros, that they've by necessity gone back to that Poulter-Sergio well, but will those guys still bring it?  You know both those guys will be in Padraig's Friday morning lineup, which is why I'll be watching from the opening tee shot.

Shack has a longish bit on course set-ups that begins with some fun history on that subject:

A not-so-pleasant surprise awaited the Americans competing in the 1957 Ryder Cup. Lindrick Golf Club was the rare non-links to host and Playing Captain Dai Rees wanted the course as fast

as possible for his mostly links-proficient team. The place was dried out for weeks except in one spot: behind the greens. Thick rough was harvested to swallow up Americans unfamiliar with landing approaches short of the green.

The desperation ploy worked. Team GB&I won 7.5 to 4.5 for their only winning effort between 1935 and 1983. Ouch. That required some serious stiff upper lippage.

The Americans returned the setup favor in 1963 at East Lake. Henry Longhurst explained:

The course plays at 6,898 yards with a par of 70, which only a few were able to match on the first day. No fewer than seventy-three extra bunkers have been put in specifically for the match, and for the past year fertilizer has been put on the rough. With the flags often very close to bunkers or at the very back of the green, East Lake presents a most exacting test.

The Americans cruised to a 23-9 win for Playing Captain Arnold Palmer. (They played two singles sessions that year, because I know you’ll ask.)

The most famous set-up controversy was Seve simply ending the fairway on the Par-5 17th at Valderrama as a means of mitigating the American's length advantage.  To me, the Americans way over-estimated the affect of tucked-pins in their Medinah meltdown (those Euros got at 'em just fine, thank you), and created what Justin Rose called a "pro-Am" set-up at Hazeltine:

“We’ve agreed to try to avoid doing so much course manipulation [during the event], because we were getting some really sneaky stuff on hole locations” says Davis Love III, who played on six Ryder Cup teams, captained the 2012 and 2016 side and will be an assistant at Whistling Straits. Even if there was no sneaky stuff, Love made his preferences known.

“In 2016 at Hazeltine, I told Kerry that you’ve set this up before and to stick with it. I didn’t want rough if at all possible. We wanted to take luck out of it and have a whole bunch of birdies, because birdies get the crowd into it. Even if we tie holes with birdies, that’ll get the crowd fired up.”

But Geoff doesn't have any specifics here, only repeating a thought that's been made by many, that Whistling Straits is enemy friendly:

What about Whistling Straits as a course regardless of course setup tactics employed? As Rapaport notes, “if you turn off Location Services and squint your eyes, you’d swear it’s an Irish links.”

While I’m not sure Team USA will resort to dropping broken tees around certain boxes to mess with the Euros during the practice rounds—as they supposedly did in 2008 at Valhalla—there has to be some American concern about Whistling Straits’ friendliness to the enemy. A treeless and edgy test with a distinct Irish vibe may not deliver a home field advantage, especially with the possibility of winds that we rarely see at Ryder Cups:

Ok.  It might look like an Irish links (one of the Kohler courses uses "Irish" in its name), but they most certainly don't play like a links.  Though this weather forecast could make things very difficult:

Yowzer.  This is a golf course that needs to be played through the air, an interesting prospect in those winds (though why Geoff grabbed a weather forecast in kilometers is anyone's guess).  We'll get a proper forecast later in the week.

I'll leave you at this juncture to get on with your week and hope to see you tomorrow.

 

Late Week Lamentations

OK, we've got our kitty blogging out of the way, so shall we get back to this golf thing?  

No Respect - They played actual PGA Tour golf yesterday in the Napa Valley, though you'd not know it from a quick scan of the three major golf sites home pages.... Hmmm, methinks the editors of Golf.com. Golf Digest and Golfweek might want to let any calls from the 904 area code go straight to voicemail.  

It's only at GolfChannel.com that we find an actual game story, though not even their own, just a posting of the AP's account:

Jon Rahm well back, Chez Reavie leads after Round 1 of Fortinet Championship

There's our first WTF of the new season, because no doubt you're mumbling to yourself, WTF is Jon Rahm doing in Napa?  Doesn't he have an event the following week?

 It's a bit more of story than intended:

Nine days before Ryder Cup, Jon Rahm withdraws from Fortinet Championship pro-am with stomach issues

There have always been guys that like to play the week before a big event, but Rahm is the one guy that I figured to go all five sessions at Whistling Straits.  But I have one minor question:

“I was having a hard time focusing given the fact that I haven’t had a solid meal since Tuesday morning,” Rahm said. “My best guess is just a little run down from the season. Maybe having a little bit too much good rich food Monday and Tuesday just did it for my stomach.”

Rahm began feeling ill earlier this week and pulled out of the pro-am Wednesday to rest. He said he felt worse than when he tested positive for COVID-19 in June and was forced to withdraw from the Memorial after leading by six strokes through three rounds.

“Way, way worse,” Rahm said. “That Saturday I couldn’t have given you any more diagnosis than maybe a light cold based on what I was feeling that day. I would have never guessed it was COVID. So yeah, I feel way worse right now than I did.”

So why are you playing?   So why am I pretending to care about this event?  I'm just happy to have the PGA Tour back after the extended off-season.... I don't know about you, but several of those eleven days really dragged for me.

Care for a little Ryder Cup blogging?  I thought you might...

One Week Out - Lots of yakking to little effect, none more so than over these comments from Brooksie in a Golf Digest interview:

For virtually all of your career, you get to set the schedule and make the rules and be responsible for your own performance. How does that mesh with the Ryder Cup experience? Is it strange being on a team?

It’s different. It’s hectic. It’s a bit odd, if I’m honest. I don’t want to say it’s a bad week. We’re

just so individualized, and everybody has their routine and a different way of doing things, and now, it’s like, OK, we have to have a meeting at this time or go do this or go do that. It’s the opposite of what happens during a major week. If I break down a major week, it’s so chill. You wouldn’t even believe me. I go to the course. I play nine holes. I go work out. Other than that, I’m sitting and watching TV, taking my mind off golf with relaxing stuff. The physical part, I can handle. The mental side, you have to be able to turn it off. Sometimes, the power comes from being able to turn it on. But for me, I get power from turning it off. That’s been a huge, huge thing for me that I really haven’t understood until the past five or six years of my career.

The choice of accompanying photo is quite odd.  He goes on at some length about the disruption to his routine, and it's genuinely hard to know how to take it..

But, as you said, at a major, you’re only concerned about yourself. At the Ryder Cup, that dynamic is different.

It’s tough. There are times where I’m like, I won my match. I did my job. What do you want from me? I know how to take responsibility for the shots I hit every week. Now, somebody else hit a bad shot and left me in a bad spot, and I know this hole is a loss. That’s new, and you have to change the way you think about things. You go from an individual sport all the time to a team sport one week a year. It’s so far from my normal routine. I can barely see my [personal] team. It’s hard to even go to the gym. At the Presidents Cup in New York, we had to go to the gym at 5 a.m. to get it in. We went to the Equinox, and it was me, Dustin and Tiger, and we come back and go to a team meeting. Under regular conditions, I take naps a lot. I might take an hour, hour-and-a-half nap, or just chill on the couch and watch “SportsCenter,” before rounds, after rounds, whatever. There’s no time to do that at the Ryder Cup. There’s no time to decompress.

A genius-level captain would say, “We’re not changing anything from your regular routine.”

For sure. If I was ever to be named a captain, one of the things I’d do is get the caddies more involved. I thought it was weird in France that there was a sign on the door that said, “No caddies allowed.” As a captain, it might be tough to get into a player’s brain, but it’s easier to get into a caddie’s brain, and that’s the next guy in line. Like, if you want to understand how it went, go talk to Ricky [Elliott] because sometimes I can’t even articulate what I’m doing or how things are going. He’s the best guy to talk to about how I’m feeling. There are times when I respond to people asking me if I’m OK by saying, “Yeah, I’m good,” but I’m not good! I’m not feeling right. And he’ll tell you.

Fair enough, though you've likely taken care of any risk of ever being named a captain...

But is he aware that this is only one week?  In case you missed that bit of cleverness, that was Brooksie's own response when queried about the Bryson manspat affecting the Ryder Cup team.  Also amusing is the fact that I think he just called caddies simpletons, so I'm guessing Paul Azinger might be the least of his worries right now.... 

But Zinger did push back predictably:

“I personally think they can put this team on their shoulders and they will do it and put their

differences aside. Brooks, when I just read that article, I’m not sure he loves the Ryder Cup that much. If he doesn’t love it, he should relinquish his spot and get people there who do love the Ryder Cup. Not everybody embraces it, but if you don’t love it and you’re not sold out, then I think Brooks should — especially being hurt, should consider whether or not he really wants to be there.”

“Then if you add the Bryson dynamic to that, that would be an easier decision for him. Brooks is one of the most candid, most honest guys there is, and if he’s blatantly honest with himself and doesn’t want to be there, he should come out and say it. I don’t know, I’m a fan of both players. I just feel like it’s going to be one or the other. They’re going to put the weight of the team on their shoulders, or they’re going to be a pain in the neck.”

It's all clearly much ado about nothing, and yet the perception lags that these guys are gonna blow it again.  Zinger's not wrong in his reaction, because what's obviously missing in Brook's comments is the commitment to deal with and thrive under these unusual demands.  All we get from him is a recitation of what everyone else is doing wrong....

Of course these guys are competitive with each other, so Bryson has to make clear that his attention is focused elsewhere:

‘My hands are wrecked’: How Bryson DeChambeau is preparing for the Ryder Cup *and* World Long Drive

I've got blisters on my fingers....

DeChambeau takes ferocious cuts with a Cobra King RadSpeed driver — “to amp himself up,” he says — as his name is announced over a loudspeaker. It’s his turn to approach a section of

artificial turf where he’ll take part in a “tournament simulation” against several bashers he’ll likely see when he participates in the upcoming Professional Long Drivers Association World Championship in Mesquite, Nev.

DeChambeau isn’t giving up his day job for a life on the long drive circuit; his Tour goals are still his top priority. But there’s something about going head-to-head against other golfers, driver in hand, that brings DeChambeau immense satisfaction.

“It’s more of an arena environment with massive speakers pumping music and energy drinks to get you amped up,” DeChambeau told GOLF.com at the Tour Championship, two weeks after his session in North Carolina. “We’re going up against the next guy. It’s not necessarily playing against the golf course; I’m trying to be faster than that guy. It’s a head-to-head competition, which I personally like and enjoy.

 Hmmmm, yanno what's also more of an arena environment?

The first tee build out at @rydercup 😮 pic.twitter.com/LjjB6IsFnp

— The Fried Egg (@the_fried_egg) September 9, 2021

None of us know how each individual should prepare for a Ryder Cup, though each of our protagonists seems to be sending the wrong signals.  Brooksie seems to want us to know that he'll be out of his comfort zone, whereas the other guy is myopically focused on his carry numbers.  What could go wrong?

 And lest we harbor any lingering doubt that Koepka will show, he said this to Eamon Lynch:

“I’m feeling good. Been doing my rehab, doing everything I need to do to be ready for the Cup. I’ll be there ready to play.”

Is that a good thing?  I do love this tough love approach, though it's the moral equivalent of hiring Tom Watson as your captain... seems like a good idea at the time, as long as you're not considering the reality of the modern pampered golf professional:

Full episode: https://t.co/hrsIjeD4Zk pic.twitter.com/9ICEWelTdX

— GOLF.com (@GOLF_com) September 15, 2021

Conceptually, I love it... But I'm guessing that Stricker will have no interest in channeling his inner Hal Sutton.

Bob Harig hints at the underlying story arc of this installment of the Ryder Cup with his item:

The U.S. Ryder Cup team has a new look in hopes of eliminating the losing that was getting old

Meanwhile, the U.S. has lost nine of the past 12 Ryder Cups. What appeared to be a strong team in 2018 got smoked in France.

So what did Stricker do?

He passed on the longtime mandate of experience and went with youth.

Six members of his team, which will face Europe starting Sept. 24 in Wisconsin, are Ryder Cup rookies -- Collin Morikawa, Patrick Cantlay, Xander Schauffele, Harris English, Daniel Berger and Scottie Scheffler.

With a chance to take experience with Patrick Reed and Webb Simpson, Stricker instead opted for four rookies among his six picks: Schauffele, English, Berger and Scheffler. Neither English nor Scheffler has played in either the Presidents Cup or Ryder Cup.

We've long been amused at the reverence paid to Ryder Cup experience, at least when said experience is of the losing kind.  But it also needs to be noted that when your rookies are guys like Morikawa and Cantlay, they're rookies only in a technical sense...

But herein lies a line of demarcation, because Captain Harrington went the other direction, ensuring that his roster would feature those that have tormented the Yanks for so long, Westwood, Garcia and, most especially, this guy:

Ryder Cup 2021: Love or loathe him, Ian Poulter is always Europe's man to beat

The best part of this predictable piece is the ground zero moment of Poults' Ryder Cup intensity:

Picture the scene. It is September 1999 and the 33rd Ryder Cup is taking place at The Country

Club in Brookline, Mass. Along with some friends, a 23-year-old by the name of Ian Poulter is

3,300-miles east inside a hostelry in Leicester Square, London, one of a large crowd sitting in front of a big-screen television.

All is well until a premature parade of American players, caddies and wives stampede across the 17th green in the wake of Justin Leonard holing his (in)famous 40-foot putt to all but clinch the biennial contest for the home side. All of which occurred before Jose Maria Olazabal was belatedly afforded a legitimate opportunity to halve the hole and extend the proceedings.

Outraged by what he saw as the injustice of it all and screaming at the top of his voice, Poulter leaps up onto a table. An exact transcript is unavailable at this time, but the gist of the ensuing tirade was that revenge would soon enough be his. He would sort out the Yanks when he got the chance. One day he would be wearing Europe’s colors. There was no doubt in his mind, despite the fact that, at the time, Poulter was a relatively impecunious member of the European Challenge Tour. Only a couple of years before, he was selling confectionery in the pro shop at Leighton Buzzard Golf Club.

Impecunious?   Someone seems to be showing off their vocabulary.... The definition is "having little or no money", which seems a bit forced in that context.  But you can read the rest on your own, as your humble blogger has no need to relive Medinah ever again.

Let me segue to this bit from the latest  Alan Shipnuck mailbag, which is all Ryder Cup-related:

Is this Ryder Cup the moment when Europe goes to the well one too many times with this core of players? #AskAlan @TheSecretDuffer

Well, if Capt. Harrington had taken Justin Rose over Shane Lowry, we could say that more definitively. Even so, Europe is now missing two of its 21st Century cornerstones in Rose and Henrik Stenson. Part of the drama of this Ryder Cup is that it could very well be the last stand for the core group of Lee Westwood (age 48), Ian Poulter (45) and Sergio Garcia (41). Given the youth on Team Europe, Harrington pretty much had to take Westwood, who has been playing great for a long time, and Poulter, who has been sneaky-good this year. Garcia was more debatable, but at the Ryder Cup, Sergio is Sergio: still dangerous and sure to gin up the Yanks.

It's a curious response from the man that famously predicted the coming era of U.S. Ryder Cup dominance, based largely upon the aging Euro core.

But what I remember is that Seve was Seve right up until the moment he wasn't....  And methinks that's exactly what will happen at Whistling Straits.  It has to happen, because the alternative, that the U.S. could be pushed to the edge and even lose this home game, is simply un fathomable....

Shall we take a stroll through that mailbag?  

Why do we all care so much? And we do all care a ton! It’s just three days and our boys don’t care as much as we do. @KYECHSPORTS

Yeah, they’re probably healthier and better adjusted than the rest of us! We care because of Seve and Payne, Ollie and Zinger. Justin Leonard’s putt. Christy O’Connor’s 2-iron. Calc’s shank. Big Jack’s concession. Rose’s 50-footer. Ballesteros’s 3-wood out of the bunker. Lanny Wadkins’s wedge. The tears streaming down Darren Clarke’s face whilst being serenaded by the crowd. Poults embracing his son after beating the world number one. Mickelson detonating Watson in front of the world. Moliwood. The Battle at Brookline. The Miracle at Medinah. Choke Hill. The War by the Shore. “I can’t hear you!” “I have a good feeling about this.” “Ladies and gentlemen, may I introduce the finest golfers in the world.” FORK OFF. I mean, I’m getting pumped just typing this!

Yeah, for sure, but am I the only one that finds his 2014 call-out jarringly inappropriate for his list?  Though he could perhaps have ignored everything after Seve on the list, because that's when this event morphed from a sleepy exhibition into Armageddon.

Does Tiger arrive Saturday night for a pep talk in the locker room? @Jminis13

Gawd, I hope so. That would be utterly epic. No offense to George W. Bush riffing on the Alamo, but can you imagine how hyped the boys in red, white and blue would be? It has to happen.

Have you guys been watching golf the last twenty-odd years?  By the way, this was Steve Stricker's comment on Tiger's non-appearance:

“He won’t be able to be a captain’s assistant this time around because of his on-going rehabilitation to try and get better. To try to play golf again. And that is going well,” Stricker said. “He’s progressing. He’s doing well, things are moving in the right direction.”

In case you failed to notice, he's just not that into us and can't be bothered showing up.  We should acknowledge that and react accordingly, but we won't.

If Brooksy can’t go, who gets the nod? Or do you sit him and take the Steve Pate half on Sunday? @JedDeMuesy

It has to be Billy Horschel, doesn’t it? He won the bloody WGC-Match Play this year! He has a gritty, Poulter-like personality that will drive the Euros batty. And at this exact moment, with a limited sample size, he’s the hottest golfer in the world. Otherwise, I’d go with Kevin Na.

You'd think that bridge was burned with his whining about not getting a call.  But, while Billy Ho might well be as annoying a pest as Poulter, are we sure he can play like Poulter has at previous Ryder Cups?  

Alan gets that very question:

Did Horschel spoil his chances by expressing his disappointment at not getting a phone call from Stricker the first time around? #AskAlan @pkeen52

If that’s the case, Steve Stricker is softer than Wisconsin brie. I was a little surprised Horschel aired his grievances publicly, but that’s who he is: passionate, fiery, politically incorrect. I like that he brought the spice. Isn’t that the kind of guy you want on your team?

All righty, but Stricker responded by telling us that he called 25-30 guys.  If Billy Ho wasn't in his initial top 25-30, wouldn't this be quite the admission of error?

Here's the  obligatory metphysical musing:

#AskAlan Do you see the Americans ever forming a “team feeling” the way the Euros have? Also, with so many Euros moving to America, do you think that connection they develop by traveling the continent may be lost eventually? @wadster13

For sure, the Euro Tour is a more collegial place, and that plays a part in the fabled chemistry of the team that is sent to the Ryder Cup. But the players are bound together by much deeper factors: language, culture and the shared national teams that groomed them. Paul Azinger’s celebrated pod system sought to replicate the small, tightly knit groups the Europeans naturally have because of their various nationalities.

Shane Lowry and Rory Mcllroy come from the same small, tribal island and have been competing alongside each other most of their lives. Jon Rahm and Sergio Garcia can talk smack about their opponents in Spanish. Two generations of English blokes on the team were groomed for this. America is a huge place that celebrates rugged individualism, so the Americans will never have the same chemistry as their opponents. But they can still build a common cause and a team chemistry that has been sorely lacking.

I think it's less a cultural thing than it is the benefit of being perennial underdogs.... The U.S. is always supposed to win, and that results in having to play to not lose...

This one is out of order, but the logical follow-up methinks:

If the U.S. somehow manages to lose this one, at home, on a very long golf course, with no European support, with the highest-ranked team in the modern era — will it be the worst #rydercup loss of all? @ProGolfAnalyst

Well, when you put it like that … The challenge of ranking the U.S. losses is that there have been so many embarrassments. But don’t sleep on this European team: Rahm is a certified killer; Rory is Rory and capable of overwhelming excellence; Poulter will go down as one of the handful of greatest Ryder Cuppers ever; Garcia, Westwood and Paul Casey are warriors who are almost never out of a hole; Tommy Fleetwood was a keynote player in Paris as a rookie; Viktor Hovland will be a load, especially in alternate shot; Lowry has a ton of game and brio. The U.S. is going to have to bring it to beat this team. But to your point, if the Americans can’t win this time around, you have to wonder if they ever will again.

I see it as a week fraught with peril for the Americans.  Not only is it a home game, but it seems to be an historically weak Euro roster and an equally ascendant core of American talent, all leading to the conclusion that the event shouldn't even be close.  Yanno, like Medina wasn't close.... Which has me wondering if that partially explains Tiger keeping his distance....

If this were an American football game, what would the point spread be? I’m thinking it would be USA -7.5. Do you think that sounds about right? Of course, we notoriously underachieve in these, so does the spread account for that? @harryarnett

That sounds about right, but I give the notorious underachievement more weight: USA -6.

I know who I would take with that kind of spread...

Who is one guy that is going to increase in value through a hot Ryder Cup performance?

(Think Leona Maguire from the Solheim…) @aspoiledwalk

Tyrrell Hatton! He is an absolute lunatic, and I say that with abiding affection. If Hatton (above) can get so mental on a Thursday morning at a hum-drum stroke-play event, can you imagine what a raging inferno he’s going to be at the f’ing Ryder Cup! For all of his antics, Hatton has a lot of game. Other than Rahm and Poulter, Team Europe has pretty mild personalities; if Hatton plays well I can see him becoming a guy the blue and yellow rallies around.

That's a good call on Alan's part, as their problem children have a history of channeling their emotions productively in this event (see, Seve, Sergio and Poults).  Personally, I'm more intrigued by Viktor Hovland and Matthew Fitzpatrick, guys that I think will prove to be match-play as assassins.

As the PGA Tour does not run the Ryder Cup, do you think ‘security’ will be summoned if we call Bryson ‘Brooksie’?? @MrRyderCup2012

Who needs security? The frothing American crowds will toss your ass in the lake. This is the one week the crowd will be on Bryson’s side, and I don’t think any mindless heckling will be well-received.

Yeah, though let's hope they patch things up before Bethpage 2025.

Is Padraig Harrington going to regret bypassing Ryder Cup stalwart Justin Rose as a captain’s pick? @KOnocomment

Unless all three of his picks go 5-0, yes. Because second-guessing the captains is part of the fun of the Ryder Cup. I think Harrington understands that, but he’s not immune to regret.

Not so much.  If Sergio and Poults cave, there will be second guessing for sure, though the name sin question will be Victor Perez and Robert McIntyre.  Rose simply has done nothing since forever....

Is Rory secretly overjoyed that he will not have to play Patrick Reed in singles? @tdshambaugh

Duh.

What do you mean by secretly?  But let's see if Rory can do anything useful, even in the absence of his personal bête noire.

Who should be the LPGA equivalent of Bubba to show some in-person support at Kohler? @robmillertime

Christina Kim, obviously.

She's far more likely than Tiger to make the effort.

This to me is an interesting question, one to which I alluded in the Napa coverage above:

How many U.S. and European players do you see playing all 5 matches in the Ryder Cup? And is it more important for Europe to perhaps ride a few (Rahm, Rory) for five matches as opposed to the U.S. squad? #AskAlan @jameswoldbdc

Yes, by almost any statistical metric the U.S. team has superior depth. I doubt Stricker is game-planning for any of his guys to play all five sessions, though if a JT or DJ or Jordan comes out on fire maybe the U.S. keeps riding them. But I fully expect Rahm and McIlroy to play all five for Team Europe. The visitors need their studs to come through in a big way.

I expect, as I've noted recently, fewer and fewer players will go all five sessions.  I've supported that premise by citing the singles failures of players from Jordan Spieth to Sergio, so I certainly expect that Stricker will limit his guys to a max of four sessions.

But the one guy I'd expect to be out there every session is Jon Rahm, because he's head and shoulders above the rest of that team.  I simply can't see Padraig putting out a roster missing that name unless, of course, they go out and grab a big lead.  

If you’re the Euros, you’re sending Rahm out in that first match, aren’t you? @Dropkick3points

Yep, pretty much every time. I think this Ryder Cup is when he becomes Europe’s team leader. McIlroy has the longer résumé, but Rahm has the duende.

Of course.  Though that's great, but only if he wins... Ask Hal Sutton what happens when your super team loses.

Over/Under on how many sentences Padraig Harrington begins with “ehhh”?@MichaelSmyth

That is one of my favorite sounds in golf. I’ll set the O/U at a million, and I hope Padraig exceeds it.

The easy answer is, "All of them."

Alan, I am attending the Ryder Cup as an American but like half a dozen European players more than I like my favorite American player. How am I to balance this fandom? #AskAlan @Sam_Beishuizen

This is the classic Ryder Cup dilemma. The Europeans are simply a jauntier, more likable, easier-to-root-for crew. But think of it like this: For the competitive integrity of the Ryder Cup, the U.S. has to win this one. So hopefully 51 percent of your heart can pull for the red, white and blue.

Alan is absolutely correct about the stakes.  Though, perhaps if we lost this one, the Euros would allow us to add the rest of North America to our team?

But I can tell you, from personal experience, that what the questioner describes was exactly my experience from Paris.  I found myself  rooting for the Euros to crush the Americans because the latter were such whiny a*****es.

This would certainly be the optimistic take on our Captain:

Why was Stricker picked to captain this? He’s only been in three Ryder Cups, and the only thing I remember about him during any of them is him and Tiger costing the U.S. the Cup in 2012. Is it because it’s in Wisconsin? #AskAlan @War_Eagle1991

Local Boy Makes Good is certainly a factor. But maybe, just maybe, Stricker will turn out to be the American McGinley: a guy with relatively light playing credentials who morphs into a spectacular captain. I’ve been impressed with everything he has done: staring down Phil and guiding him to a vice captaincy; getting Brooks Koepka to stand down in his embarrassing squabble with Bryson DeChambeau; giving Patrick Reed the unofficial suspension he deserves; and the learned approach Stricker brought to his picks. Obviously the toughest tests are still coming. But given all the bad juju around this U.S. team, maybe Stricker’s Wisconsin nice is exactly what this crew needs.

Lots to mull here, but I do agree that our fetish over playing credentials is misplaced, especially since most of our captains experienced far more Ryder Cup failure than success (Furyk, Love, Pavin, Kite, Lehman...shall I go on?).

Like Alan, I do think the potential Phil issue was managed with surprising deft, though I'm unclear as to whether that's Stricker's doing, or word came from elsewhere.  But it would be hard to identify a captaincy more disastrous than Jim "Alas, Poor" Furyk's 2018 turn, yet there he is as a Vice Captain In-Good-Standing at Whistling Straits.  So, it seems the cool kids remain firmly in charge...

One last bit revisiting Alan's famous prediction:

How tempted are you to double down this week? @BCRafferty

There is no doubling down. If you read my original column back in 2017, it’s a long-range prediction that will take a decade or more to play out. Paris wasn’t a great start, obviously, but if/when the U.S. wins this one that will be two out of three, with a roster boasting tons of young talent, just as Poulter and Westwood and maybe Garcia are being put out to pasture alongside Stenson and Rose. I still think I’m gonna be right, but unfortunately, we’ll have to wait until at least 2029 to know for sure. Gawd help us all.

The funniest part of this all were the declarations of success after 2016....  But for those that get ahead of themselves, we'll always have Paris.

OK Kids, have a great weekend.  I'm off to play with some kitties, but I'll see you on Monday.