Friday, June 5, 2020

World On Fire, Why Does Golf Want In?

NOTE TO READERS:  The rant below started life as part of a typical catchall post, but after finishing it decided to separate it from the more typical golf content.  It basically features some known voices arguing that golf needs to become increasingly politicized, which I find the most depressing prospect possible.  Feel free to skip it if you're not in a mood to wallow further, and I'll move on to a post that can function as a safe space... Well, as safe as things get here in this forum.

It'x been a tough week to be an American, and I'm actually relieved to have not been at the keyboard for a few days.  I'll try hard to focus on our little game and not make what follows overly-political, but you'll see quickly that that's an impossible undertaking.  Why?  Because so many in our game think just the opposite, to wit, that the game of golf was invented for the sole purpose of confirming their worldviews....

There's no style book to which I can refer for guidance, so let me try to sort my way through the miasma.  The story from Minneapolis was obviously quite horrid, but it doesn't help that folks are insistent on drawing exactly the wrong conclusions therefrom.  Let me just give one ever-so-small example, this from the ever-so-woke Eamon Lynch:
To be fair, seeing golfers join #BlackoutTuesday is a little like watching those last few kids climb on their desks at the end of Dead Poets Society, when the lack of repercussions is clear, when it’s not just the right thing to do but the popular thing to do. But taken alongside Rory McIlroy’s recent criticism of Donald Trump’s mishandling of the coronavirus pandemic, these posts hint at a watershed moment when some Tour pros finally voice sentiments that run counter to the fact-free, Fox News Channel echo chamber in which so many of their fellow golfers reside. 
Statements of convenience? Sure, but also of conscience.
Nicely done, Eamon, because MSNBC and CNN have so distinguished themselves during this crisis.  Oh, and if you want to something that's actually fact-free, that would be Rory's criticism of Trump's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.  Not only did he fail to articulate any logic for his criticism, as in what he might have done differently, but apparently no state governors were involved in the Covid protocols....

Now, Eamon (who, like Rory, is an Ulsterman), is very quick to make clear that there is only one approved narrative:
The murder of yet another unarmed black man—in this instance, George Floyd, who died at the knee of a Minneapolis police officer—has brought the country to a reckoning with its persistent, ugly shortcomings on matters of race, a bench-clearing brawl in which not even professional golfers could remain on the sidelines.
Eamon, you're new here, so we have lots of these.  The problem is, that approved narrative hasn't always proven out to be true.  Submitted for your approval, Governor Lockdown herself is captured in this one, pitch-perfect header:
Video: Gretchen Whitmer Violates Own Social Distancing Order During Protest, Chants ‘Hands Up Don’t Shoot’
You get everything going on there?  Not only was the lockdown and social distancing necessary for the survival of the species only until it came into conflict with liberal political needs, but she's continuing to parrot the Great Lie of Ferguson.
 'Hands up, don't shoot' ranked one of biggest 'Pinocchios' of 2015
But Eamon is on a crusade...  The game needs to make a stand, and by game what he really means is....
Of course, the voice many of us wished to hear was that of Tiger Woods, and on Monday evening he joined a long line of African-American sports figures who had spoken out.
He released a statement in which he expressed his pain for the suffering of George Floyd’s family, before quickly pivoting to his admiration for law enforcement and a plea for progress through education. Those are all noble sentiments, but Woods’s statement was notable for omitting a single mention of the fetid racial injustice that underpins the story of George Floyd and the many others like him. 
Woods has spent his career avoiding taking stands on divisive issues, which is fair enough. There is an unreasonable yoke of expectation placed on African-American athletes to take public, principled stands on non-sporting matters. Not everyone has the courage or passion of a Muhammad Ali, an Arthur Ashe, or a Colin Kaepernick, but even the original corporate cipher Michael Jordan didn’t disguise his anger about where we find ourselves today.
Why?  Where is it written that black athletes generally or Tiger specifically have to opine on the issues of the day?  More importantly why, in these hyper-polarized times, do you think this would be a good thing.  And, it needs to be asked, why would you assume that to be a good thing? 

Eamon is virtue signalling his woke bona fides, about which he demonstrates absolute moral authority.   That's great, Mr. Floyd's death is obviously highly troubling and Orange Man is quite obviously bad, but where does one go from there?  This keeps happening in cities controlled by the opposition party to Orange Man, so how's that accountability thing going?  Oh, and how are we feeling about Police unions that continue to protect the cops perpetrating the outrages?  I know, the world is really complicated...

Then there's the issue of distinguishing between protesters and rioters...  How's the media been doing there?  I especially loved this quintessential 2020 header from the lovely folks at MSNBC:
MSNBC's Ali Velshi says situation not 'generally speaking unruly' while standing outside burning building
I intentionally linked to the Fox account of that bit of silliness, which I judge to be not fact-free....

Fresh off his successful sponsorship of the Chainsmokers Tour, Jay Monahan wants to get into the morality business:
“This past weekend, I – like many of you, I’m sure – spent a lot of time trying to
understand and process the civil unrest that has engulfed many cities across the United States, following the tragic death of George Floyd in Minneapolis,” read the memo, according to Golf Channel. “The hardships and injustices that have and continue to impact the African-American community are painful to watch and difficult to comprehend. And as a citizen of this country and a leader of this organization, I must admit that I’m struggling with what my role should be. But I’m not giving up.” 
Monahan also wrote that in recent days he has had conversations with members of the black community to better understand the current crisis and the systemic racism that they grapple with on a daily basis, and that process continues. The commissioner did not announce any specific actions the Tour will immediately take, but instead suggested that this is the time for “listening and making a commitment to understand.” 
“We might not know exactly what to do right now,” Monahan added, “but we shouldn’t be deterred. We should communicate and learn. We should talk to our family, friends and colleagues in an open and compassionate way. We should grow as individuals and as an organization. And, most importantly, we should demand better,” Monahan said.
Let me be clear Jay, not knowing what to do should always be a deterrent.... It's all PR pablum, but there's never a downside to shutting up.

Oddly, there is one guy I'm willing, even anxious to hear from:
“We’re going to be the first sport to really get back going and … we’ll be spending a lot more time than we usually spend together,” Varner said. “There’s going to be conversations like this. You know, the most amazing thing about life is that there can be a lot of good, even though it’s not on social media, it’s not on this camera. There’s going to be conversations.”
You mean good things happen that aren't on Twitter?  Big, if true....
“I think as an athlete you play a huge role but the biggest role you play as a human is knowing what’s right and wrong, and how much wrong we saw,” Varner said. “I’m going to fight the good fight and I think it was time to say something because I’ve always had an opinion on something. I always have, and probably always will, but the people who think that we shouldn’t say anything, that’s their opinion. I want to do what I can for the betterment of this world — that’s my job as a human, as a person in society. I’m going to speak up.”
But that's because Varner has made it clear that he's not part of the racial grievance industrial complex, which per the rules of Joe Biden means that he's not really black. 

Also on this topic, Shack and Dylan Dethier joined in the big sad over the harsh reaction some golfers received on Twitter.  Apparently, the U.S. Constitution guarantees them a life free from conflicting opinions or something.


So, let me confess that I'm not exactly sure what that blackout was really meant to support.  Here's an explanation that I found online, though others may differ on its interpretation:
On Tuesday, social media was flooded with symbolic black squares. Instagram. Blackout Tuesday is an initiative to go silent on social media, reflect on recent events, and stand in solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement.
So guys like Justin Thomas and Brooks Koepka bought in and posted in support of this meme.  But these posts hit during a morally tenuous period, one in which we obviously had many folks emotionally distraught over a seemingly needless death.  Fair enough, but in the midst of these protests we also find anarchists looting, burning buildings and throwing Molotov cocktails at police cars, so how are we to react?  Apparently, nothing screams justice quite like torching a black man's home or business....

Young Dylan and the older but equally-granola crunching Shack find the response to those tweets alarming and counter-productive.  But shall we look at a few of these responses?  First, a couple directed at Brooks:
"You don't care but you just took a stance I disagree with. Good look with your career. It has been fun...until now." 
"Brooks oh boy I was a fan of yours but not now you need to stick to golf and get out of this type of arena with your post for your information all lives matter young man please stick with golf."
Oh, the inhumanity!  That Brooks should be forced to deal with, or even see, a dissenting opinion when we all acknowledge that there is only one acceptable, approved narrative.

Let's agree that the first response is of limited interest, but that second one is actually worth Brooks' consideration.  Obviously the contention that black lives matter wouldn't be controversial, except for the niggling detail that those espousing it shout down any response that hints at all lives (or, dare I suggest it, that blue lives) matter.  That distinction might seem to matter in a moment when cops are being targeted, at least to some of our citizens....

And one each to JT and Rickie:
To Thomas: 
"Can’t you just stick to golf?" 
"JT you should bring that message to Chicago’s south and west side. Agreed-All lives do matter. It starts in the communities. Stick with Golf." 
To Fowler: 
"Stick to golf but you can’t win a major anyway. Blue lives matter too!" 
"Disappointed Rickie...Your post were always about golf..."
What's the common theme?  A theme that Dylan and Geoff find beyond the pale?   It's the highly incendiary thought, "How about you boys stick to golf"?  Do you think that those comments delivered on Geoff's blog post header?
"PGA stars receive backlash, hate after 'Blackout Tuesday' posts"
Geoff, you think that's hate?  Geoff, did you catch Al Sharpton's eulogy yesterday?  Are you familiar with his extensive qualifications in the world of actual hate that has consequences?  Ever hear of Steven Pagones?  How about Freddy's Fashion Mart?  That's actual hate, but in the service of their preferred narrative, so nothing to see here.

My purpose is simple.  Like those commentators, I'd strongly suggest to the game that I love and it's people and leaders, that we simply give the culture wars a pass.  There is no scenario under which golf will benefit, and encouraging golfers to enter the fray is just self-destructive.

So, what's really going on here?  My guess is that folks like Eamon and Geoff are seizing on an opportunity to express their frustration over something far different, which is the general conservative nature off professional golfers.  Why are professional golfers so conservative?  Here we go back to a familiar resource, Robert Conquest's first law of politics:
Everyone is conservative about what he knows best.
My take on the last week of news is to suggest that we skip the preliminaries and head straight to the forthcoming civil war.  I see a left that's itching for and will not be deterred from that civil war, they are simply unwilling to live in a world that dares to differ from their worldview.  We see that in these stories above, but also in the reaction to the Covid virus as well...  Think about the reaction to those brave souls that protested the lockdowns....  No dissenting thoughts will be tolerated, Oceana has always been on lockdown.

Is this what we want for our game?  I just can't see how Goeff and Dylan think this will play out in any favorable way....  We may not be able to avoid it with the mother-of-all elections on the horizon, but don't we want golf to remain a refuge from this crap? 

Tuesday, June 2, 2020

News And Notes

A little of 'dis, and a dollop of 'dat for you today.  The usual Tour restrat stuff, but also some architectural musings... 

Gentlemen, Restart Your Engines - We are at T-minus nine days for the Tour's resumption of play.  It's all very exciting, though it of course pales in comparison to the rumor that salons and barbershops might re-open...  I'm not sure where either fits on Maslow's hierarchy of needs, I'm merely hoping to avoid another back-alley haircut.

Brian Wacker has the news of an information package sent to the players:
The resumption of the PGA Tour season is a week away, and tour officials have offered further details on their health and safety plans with a 34-page “Participant Resource Guide,” which was sent to players on Monday morning.

Many of the points in the guide, a copy of which was seen by Golf Digest, have been previously reported. The document, however, illuminates the Tour’s plans for a return, identifying more specifics as well as modifications to previous guidelines.
I hear it's quite the page turner, but let's focus like a laser on the surprises:
Most notable among the guidelines is that while COVID-19 testing is a condition of competition, the at-home test players and caddies take before traveling is not required but rather “strongly encouraged.” Also, should a player or caddie test positive while at a tournament, they’ll receive a stipend from the Tour to cover associated costs, but only if they have taken the at-home test and tested negative. Players are, however, required to fill out daily self-screening questionnaires starting seven days prior to departing for a tournament.

“The at-home test is intended to help players avoid the unlikely situation of testing positive and be required to quarantine away from home,” said Joel Schuchmann, PGA Tour VP of communiations, when reached by Golf Digest. “They will be tested immediately upon arrival into Fort Worth.”
I'm actually unsure of how I feel about that, but Geoff is certainly a bit miffed:
So the PGA Tour’s view is that the pre-tournament test is one to prevent an inconvenient stranding, but if safety of players and those around them was the ultimate priority, I would think an all-clear test before traveling was one of the most important steps.

This hole in the “bubble” is one of several—media and spouses/partners/inspirational companions/new Tinder matches who choose to travel and stay with players are not mentioned in any of the documents as part of the testing bubble. This, combined with not requiring an all-clear test after three months away from the Tour, explains why the word “screening” has been used to date.
Should we care about this rather minute difference, which seems limited to whether a player testing positive does or does not receive a stipend?  I do assume that these guys don't present a huge risk factor, as I'll estimate that approximately zero have been on the NYC subway system since March.

I do get that the Tour is not testing everyone on site, which would seem to me the bigger concern.  As for the inevitable Tinder hook-ups, well, we can only wish that these guys were that interesting.

This to me is the more interesting and amusing bit, as it tells us so much about our society.  

That third bullet point seems especially amusing, given the size of their staff bags and the fact that only one guy touches it.  But more to the point, golf quickly mobilized a series of protocols in reaction to those scary stories of how long the virus could stay active on surfaces....Yet, this walk-back is the proverbial tree falling in the forest:
CDC Now Says Virus 'Does Not Spread Easily' on Surfaces
As amusing as watching Tour caddies sanitizing bunker rakes might be, how long will we have to endure all this nonsense?   As a first pass answer, I'm going with forever....  After all, folks are still removing their shoes at airports...

Shack also seems upset about alleged loophole:
The other noticeable loophole involves players being able to stay in a rental home, RV or at the “bubble” hotel with a companion not allowed at the course, but also free to roam the host city or anywhere but the golf course.
Le Sigh!  Apparently Geoff thinks the quarantines should be a forever thing...  and then there's shock when people protest the lockdowns.  Just a reminder, Geoff, this was supposed to be a couple of weeks.  People are going to resume their lives, whether you like it or not.  If a condition of play is that you cease your relationship with your wife or girlfriend, we'll see how that turns out....

Dave Shedloski is there for those needing help to repare:
Wait … wait … GO!: The best advice for players on how to be mentally ready to restart the 2020 PGA Tour season
 Given the bubble in which these guys resided pre-Covid, are we especially worried?
“Basically, how guys prepare for competition isn’t going to change. These guys know
how to get ready to play golf, and they know what to do when the gun goes off,” Dr. Bob Rotella said. “Obviously, things going on in the world have affected their daily lives, and it has affected the rhythm of their season, their practice and so forth, but they can’t let that get in the way of their proven methods and mindset. Having said that, human nature dictates that everyone is different.”

“Inside the ropes, it’s going to change the least. Playing the game is still playing the game,” Dr. Mo Pickens agreed. “But whatever the way things were at the last event we played, we aren’t going to see that coming back, maybe ever. A ‘normal’ week is going to be different. We will still have the traveling circus, but it is going to be a different circus.”
Seems like it'll be quite a bit quieter inside the ropes...  Any time the world stops and starts, there will be some guys that look unprepared when the gun goes off.  Whether that's an actual lack of preparation, or just the random walk of life remains an enduring mystery.  But if I seem unconcerned, it's because that, like myself, these just aren't the folks we should be worrying about at this juncture.

They're world class at blocking out the rest of the world, so they'll be fine...  Even in our little golf bubble, there are so many more deserving of our concern and assistance.  But we can all use the amusement, and we still need to convince a whole bunch of governors that it's OK for folks to continue living, so let's hope golf can be helpful in that regard.

Moscow Rules - The National Golf Foundation informs us that 98% of the country's golf courses are open.  Heck, even Scotland is back to playing golf, and who ever thought we'd see that in our lifetime.  But there's one valiant holdout, bravely protecting its serfs from temptation:
Live in New York City and want to play golf? 
Get out of the city. It’s your only option. You’ll have to go play elsewhere — Long Island, Westchester, New Jersey or Connecticut, Pennsylvania, wherever … if you’re lucky enough to find a precious tee time. 
Inexplicably, while golf courses all over the tristate area — and around the country for that matter — are open for play, the 13 courses in the five boroughs of the city remain closed, as they’ve been since they were ordered to shut down on March 22. 
Not only have city golfers been deprived of critical outdoor recreation, but the operators of the golf courses are hemorrhaging money as they struggle to maintain the expensive upkeep of the properties without the business revenue to offset the significant costs.
This is another of those effortless segues, in which I pay off that comment above abut the folks deserving of our concern and help.  High on that list should be any human being forced to do business with the Mayor From Hell:
“It’s devastating,’’ Rich McDonough, the director of golf at Marine Park in Brooklyn, told The Post on Friday. “You’re talking about multi-million-dollars-a-year businesses that have absolutely no ability to operate, and there’s no reason whatsoever why they’re not open.’’ 
Mike Giordano, who operates Marine Park as the concessionaire, said he “thought initially it was going to end in a couple weeks, then it became a month now we’re into our third month.’’ 
“This could be a death blow to us,’’ Giordano told The Post. “Nobody has unlimited funds. You exhaust your funds as the clock keeps ticking.’’ 
Giordano said he’s spending $100,000 per month to maintain the golf course with no revenue coming in and — most appallingly — no communication from City Hall.
“Mike is obligated to maintain these properties with no revenue, which is ridiculous,’’ McDonough said. “Every Nassau County and Suffolk County course is operating, New Jersey is operating, everything around the five boroughs is wide open. The nonsense behind this is all coming out of City Hall and [Mayor Bill de Blasio] doesn’t seem to have any kind of a plan.’’ 
Giordano said “the most troubling thing about this is nobody has identified any sort of finish line’’ for the end of the closures.
As a wise man said, Commie's gonna Commie....  I don't see the issue, as I've been reliably informed that business owners are fully on board with the Il Duce
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has been blasted as a 'liar' for claiming that struggling small businesses are 'hanging on' and are prepared to stay closed for 'months' yet as he continues to cling on to the city's lockdown despite mounting calls to reopen.
Previously I had been reliably informed that it was a three-hour tour...

Of course, things at Marine Park are even worse than just being forced to close:
A band of hooligans stole five golf carts from a Brooklyn golf course to go on a joyride and vandalized the course, along with a fleet of other carts, causing $100,000 in damages, police and a staffer said. 
“It looks like a tornado hit the course,” Richard McDonough, the director of golf operations at Marine Park Golf Course told The Post on Monday, adding that 25 of the roughly 60 carts were wrecked.
Nothing says Justice quite like destroying golf carts, we can all agree.  Amusingly, the stupid criminal meme has another in its long series of entries:
Officers searching the Marine Park neighborhood by car nearly collided with five suspects each zipping around on a golf cart when the police made a right turn from Avenue V onto Hendrickson Street nearby the course, cops said. 
The thugs then ditched the golf carts and ran into the nearby parking lot of the Kings Plaza Shopping Center, said authorities. 
Following a brief foot chase, cops were only able to catch up with one of the vandals – a 16-year-old boy. 
The teen was arrested on charges of burglary, grand larceny, criminal mischief, reckless endangerment, and criminal trespass, authorities said.
The cops didn't exactly distinguish themselves either, but such is life in DeBlassio's People's Republic.  And the final nail in the coffin:
When the golf course eventually reopens from its coronavirus-induced shutdown, there will likely be restrictions of one person to a golf cart for social distancing purposes, McDonough explained, noting that the fleet of trashed golf carts will now make logistics even harder.
When?  More like if....

Architectural Musings -  A few unrelated items on this subject, beginning with this promising header:
Course Rater Confidential: What makes golf-course routing so hard, and so important?
The answers seem pretty obvious, but there are interesting folks involved so let's see what they have for us.
1. Routing has been called “the hidden art” of golf-course architecture. Are there any golden rules of routing? Absolute no-nos? Any hard lessons you’ve learned in
your own career about what to do (or not do) when routing a course?
Tom Doak (Panelist since 1983; has played 97 of the World Top 100; author of the forthcoming book on routing, Getting To 18): In general, I feel that others’ rules for golf design were made to be broken, but one absolute no-no for me is to build a dogleg hole with another golf hole on the inside of it. I managed to win the job at Stonewall in Pennsylvania many years ago by remarking how people would inevitably short-cut their planned 18th hole by going down the 10th fairway, which they had not noticed. But then I made the same mistake in our redesign of Atlantic City Country Club, extending the 10th hole into a par-5, which meant that going down the fairway of the 9th would be an attractive option to some. Just try telling people not to take advantage of a short-cut in a casino town! Never again…
Funny story, I played ACCC in a Pro-Am with Big-Break Anthony  and he encouraged me to the play the hole via that ninth fairway...  The other interesting part of the hole is that the tee box is part of the practice green, a strange experience when you tee your ball up.
Jim Urbina (Panelist since 2015; has played 69 of the World Top 100): In his book, Golf Architecture, Alister MacKenzie described 13 rules to follow when designing and building a golf course; he broke every rule. Several hard lessons to learn. When someone says, “Build me a championship golf course,” the golf course should be hard but fair and the golf course should have a balanced scorecard. These are a few examples that stifle the designer. These demands hamper the creative process when trying to find the best holes on any given property.
The photo above is Pacific Dunes, designed by Tom Doak back when Jim Urbina was his design associate/master shaper.  Urbina is the lesser known of the two, but Mike Keiser thought so highly of him that he forced Doak to co-design Old Macdonald with his former employee...

There's more, all of it interesting (at east if one tests positive for the design nerd gene):
2. For all those armchair architects out there who think, “I could do THAT,” what are some of the biggest challenges of routing that might not be obvious to the outside observer?
Doak: When people tell me one of my holes would have been better had I located the green or tee differently, I think, sure, but what about the holes that come before and after? The routing is a puzzle and it’s important that the pieces fit together well. When we are honing in on the final plan, anytime we consider tweaking a hole, it’s two or three holes that will be affected, because you can’t knock over one domino without hitting another. (Well, I suppose you can if you want a 100-yard cart ride from each green to the next tee, but I hate that sort of arrangement.) The other two fundamentals of routing are trying to plan the fairways around areas where drainage collects, and maintaining visibility from tee to fairway to green, two things that most amateurs don’t even think about until they run into trouble.
The biggest surprise to civilians is probably the extent to which routing and design are driven by drainage... it's its own dark art form.
Curley: Don’t get too hung up on the scorecard and by all means try to use the routing as the first tool to create variety in design. Look for natural holes as much as possible but, at the same time, do not be afraid to move dirt if you must. Grades must be lived with for the life of the course but nips and tucks can change initial designs (many great courses have done so over the years but few have made drastic grade changes). Find the great opportunities but don’t shy away from an occasional breather hole. Find the great natural par-3 but remember (as Pete Dye told me) you can always put a par-3 anywhere.
I know I'm going long, but this is the money bit:
3. What’s an example of a masterful routing? 
Doak: Cypress Point is famous for how it goes through the dunes into the trees, back out into the dunes for the 8th and 9th, back into the trees again at 10 and 11, and then out across the dunes to the ocean. At Pacific Dunes I tried to mimic that. Many people have noted how the holes along the ocean aren’t at the end of each nine, but interspersed through the round so you never know when to expect them. But, the other great feature of the property was the bowl of sand dunes in the center, which gave me places for four great short par-4 holes, but I didn’t want to use them all consecutively. So, you play the first and second holes in the bowl, then you head to the ocean for 3-4-5, come back into the bowl for the 6th-7th-8th, head to the ocean again (twice), and come back through the bowl one last time at the short par-4 16th.
A number of thoughts.... It's hubris to compare his Pacific Dunes to the Sistine Chapel of golf, but I actually think he's on solid ground.  Cypress is famous for it's eccentric routing, notably featuring BOTH back-to-back Par-5's and B-to-B Par-3's, the latter being two of the most famous one-shotters on our planet.

Yet Pacific Dunes is an equally weird scorecard, with a back nine featuring only two Par-4's.  And while the PD site is not quite as varied as CPC, no parkland element, it's routing is equally breathtaking.  

But also a reminder, we recently had a tease for the original Seth Raynor routing of Cypress, meaning that we might be able to compare how two Golden Era greats would have routed their eighteens over one of the best grounds for golf in the world.  Be still my foolish heart...

Other musings of an architectural nature include a couple related to the new course at Bandon:
BANDON, Ore. – There are plenty of cliffside holes to love at Bandon Dunes Golf Resort’s new Sheep Ranch, which opens June 1 and features nine greens on the 100-foot cliffs above the beach and Pacific Ocean below. 
But the focal point clearly is the giant, undulating, made-for-selfies double green perched atop Fivemile Point. 
One piece of advice: If you’re afraid of heights, don’t look down. Plenty of photos and drone videos show the steepness of that edge of North America, but it feels even more dramatic when you take a break from reading putts to sneak a peek westward.
Any guesses at the source of the inspiration for a massive double green?
The green is massive, with separate tall dunes blocking the right-side entrances to both holes. No. 3 plays almost directly west from the interior of the course, while No. 16 stretches along the cliff from a tee box set south of the green. The highest portion of the green serves as the front for No. 3 and is not really in play for No. 16. From that high point it’s down, around, over lumps and swales to the lowest portion of the green just a step from the cliff’s edge.
Not in play?   We'll see about that, but it looks and sounds spectacular.

More musings triggered by this new track:
Sand bunkers: Do we need them? Sheep Ranch challenges that question
 That depends... Are we getting rakes back anytime soon?

Why, I hear you asking:
Ever-present wind, Lusk told JuliaKate Culpepper. 
“It’s hard to explain how strong that wind is,” Lusk said. “I’ll give a quick example — along the cliffs I hit a drive that went about 350 yards, and I don’t hit 350-yard drives. Into that same wind along the cliffs, I hit a very solid drive that went 140 yards. It’s a 210-yard difference on the wind on a tee shot. 
“Now when that kind of wind comes blowing it up across the golf course with traditional bunkers, the sand flakes out, it creates these little tornadoes in bunkers and you see the wind spinning in the sand. You see that sometimes on the other Bandon courses, particularly on Old MacDonald, where you’ve actually seen it flying across the property.”
Like everything else in the world, this is an interesting adaptation necessitated by a unique feature of this property.  But, given the expense of maintaining bunkers, the lesson here is one of degrees:
Lusk noted that sand bunkers can be expensive to maintain and are often the first thing to show wear. It wouldn’t be surprising if this trend became more popular. 
“You’re starting to see this with some other courses around the country,” Lusk said. “More and more people are experimenting with leaving out, if not all, then at least some bunkers, because bunkers are a maintenance nightmare and that adds to the cost of running a golf course.”
Our bunker renovation project at Fairview took out  maybe a half-dozen bunkers, though we might look back and think we could have removed others.

One last item before we move on, a mess of a feature that purports to explain the world to us:
Here are the 6 different types of golf courses, explained
Yeah, I'm thinking that the world doesn't fit quite that easily into categories... This is from newcomer Desi Isaacson, he of the recent series of features on template holes, which also featured fatal flaws.

He starts near and dear to my heart with this:
Links course 
First up is the most famous type of golf course, the links course. The term derives from the Old English word hlinc meaning rising ground or ridge and refers to sandy area along coast. While many courses claim to be links, call themselves links-style, or have the
word links in their name, the category is more specific than that. True links courses are mostly found in Scotland, Ireland and England. The course must be along the coast with sandy soil underneath. Links golf is where the game was founded as this sandy soil was perfect for the game and not great for much anything else. The land wasn’t of any use for agriculture so people started looking for a different use for it. The sandy soil drains remarkably well, keeping the ground firm — ideal for a golf course. You can check out the links association website which tracks all the courses in the world that fit their criteria of true links. Some of these courses include The Old Course at St. Andrews, Royal Troon, Lahinch, and several of the courses at Bandon Dunes golf resort. 
But this doesn’t tell the whole story. When most people think of links-style golf, they are picturing golf that can be played along the ground with lots of undulation, plenty of dunes and little to no trees. These courses also usually feature pot bunkers as opposed to the larger sprawling American-style bunkers. Because of the lack of trees and waterfront location, wind plays a huge factor on most links courses. 
Now, architects have started trying to replicate some of these features on land that aren’t technically suitable for links courses. They will build wide-open courses and try to make the ground feel naturally undulating and windswept. These courses can still be tons of fun, even if they aren’t technically links courses.
This is mostly accurate, though if you're going to address the prevalence of faux-links, it's hard to do so without talking about the grasses involved.  And I'd have thought you'd want to note that the Open Championship is played exclusively on links...

Isaacson takes us through the litany of parkland, heathland and sandbelt courses in passably competent fashion, though I do think he underestimates the importance of a sandy base and the resulting similarities in the architecture of these types of courses.  It's not for nothing that heathland and sandbelt courses are sometimes referred to as inland links.  Substrate is destiny...

But then he lays a massive category error on us:
Stadium/Championship course
This may be what folks call their courses, but it's not a type of course in the sense that the specifics of a site drive the design. It's just a marketing term that folks used back in the Robert Trent Jones era, but that we've mercifully moved on from in recent times.  Of course, Royal Troon is both a links and a championship course, hence his category error.
And someone needs to explain to him that the Par-3 at Augusta is still a parkland course....

Golfers Being Stupid - I know, I'm gonna need a bigger blog... Anyway, we just have a confluence of folks in and around our game saying things that profoundly silly.  

First up, Justin Rose is just off his mutual break-up with Honma, was interviewed by Ryan Asselta, and had some curious thoughts on the Ryder Cup:
Ryan Asselta: Justin, this is supposed to be a Ryder Cup year. There have been some opinions given by Rory McIlroy and Brooks Koepka on the possibility of playing the matches at Whistling Straits with no fans. You’ve played on five European Ryder Cup teams. Is it worth playing the Cup with no fans? 
Justin Rose: We might actually be used to it by then. It might almost be interesting if the Ryder Cup is the first event with fans. Who knows how the summer is gonna play out? The thought of a Ryder Cup without fans is mind-blowing, but what is the new normal? Would we rather still have the opportunity to play? You can’t just bump everything to 2021 because 2021 becomes chaos if that’s the case.
Interesting, Justin, because you know what else in addition to the Ryder Cup is being pushed into 2021?  That would be....errr, nothing.  And we all understand that if the Ryder Cup is pushed into '21, then the Prez Cup will inevitably move to 2022.  So, WTF are you talking about?

But he's not done with the head-scratchers:
Justin Rose: In one way, it could be more intense between the two players. There’s nowhere to hide, nowhere else to look. You know, it’s eyeball to eyeball. It could create a bizarrely intense environment.
 Maybe.... But it could also be flat and lifeless.  Amusingly, Justin's wife Kate participated in the interview and her thought are no more tightly tethered to reality.  

Next up is a frequent offender...please give it up for the one and only Shark.  Most of us enjoyed the Premier Golf League story for the pressure it put on the PGA Tour, though it seemed unpromising and dreary at best.

But Mr. Norman had a much more personal reaction, because they were stealing his idea.  I know, but I'm inclined to be charitable because his pimped out golf carts failed to revolutionize our 600-year old game, and who coulda seen that coming?

So Greg is here with an update on the PGL, most notable for the troubling specificity of his fever dream:
HOBE SOUND, Fla. — The Premier Golf League is not dead. The world needs it now
more than ever! So says Greg Norman, an Aussie who has lived in Florida most of his adult life and is a 2001 inductee into the World Golf Hall of Fame. 
Golf needs fewer events with more star power, Norman says, and that will ultimately happen because golf fans across the world will want it to happen. Norman says he has had no communication with the league’s organizers since February, but his understanding is that the first PGL event will be in January 2022. There may be no bigger believer in this new league than Norman.
Really, you can't make this up.  The rest of the world doesn't know if we'll ever be able to play golf in front of spectators again, but Greg has the tee sheet for the first PGL event.  

But wait, there's more... We can safely assume that the folks in Ponte Vedra Beach have no use for this gadfly, a safe assumption because they barely tolerated him when he was playing.  But he's got the skinny on everything:
Norman is saying the PGL, in concept and in practice, won’t be killed by the Covid-19 pandemic. He’s saying the PGL won’t be killed by the public disavowals of it by Rory McIlroy and Brooks Koepka. And, Norman is saying, the PGL won’t be killed by whatever the PGA Tour is cooking up in an effort to squash it. News of the PGL dominated golf websites in January and February of this year, when the world was in a different place. The proposed league would be funded by Saudi wealth. 
“What I’m hearing is that the PGA Tour, against all their bylaws and governances, is talking about putting aside a $40 million pot for eight players, with $8 million for the top player,” Norman said in a recent interview. “The PGA Tour is re-tweaking their model with the PGL out there. If you’re player nine, 10, 11 or 12, I think you’d be pretty pissed off.”
The rough English translation is along the lines of, "I'm still big, it's the pictures that got small".  Come to think of, Norma (Desmond) vs. Norman.... just a coincidence?

But isn't it the absolute certainty and specificity that's most interesting, at least in a psychological pathology sense?  Damn it, attention must be paid!  The funniest part of all is that what he's describing pretty much already exists, it's called the FedEx Cup.  But thanks for sharing, Sharkie...

We'll go out on this bit from Bryan Zuriff, the producer of The Match series and good buddy of Phil.  This comes with its own rebuttal from Mike Bamberger, as Zuriff is beating his chest about the franchise of challenge matches involving Phil and Tiger, first with this bit of hype:
Zuriff expects a Match III, with Tiger and Phil, maybe even on the same team. The event would raise money for a good cause and be a payday for the participants and others. “They’re professional athletes, they should be paid,” Zuriff said. He imagines a second-day event that would not be televised, featuring the athletes, an event for which sponsors would pay large sums to participate. Zuriff’s tie is to Mickelson, “the best entertainer that golf has ever seen. He’s magic. He can do anything in front of a camera.”
That's pure hype, but at least with a grounding in reality coming off Phil's performance at Medalist.  But, not content to rest on that, he then takes it that one additional step into Normanland:
“Bottom line,” Zuriff said, there is “something about Phil and Tiger that works.
Chemistry. Movie magic.” 
You’re tempted to scratch your head — could there be two star golfers with less chemistry? But, as they say at Graceland, 50 million Elvis fans can’t be wrong. Nearly six million people watched Match II. This show’s going on.
Thanks, Mike, for saving me the trouble of reminding folks of the reality of things.  But they succeeded largely because the absence of any televised sports created unique pent-up demand, and they seized that intelligently in including the QBs.  

Of course they want to milk it, but it's a much harder thing to keep the interest level high.  I don't actually like their chances, especially since the one indispensable participant adds nothing to the broadcast...

Not sure when we'll next meet, as I've morning golf planned for the nest two days.  

Monday, June 1, 2020

Weekend Wrap

Hope everyone enjoyed the weekend...  Glorious weather here in the Northeast, almost enough to take our minds off the headlines.  I've got a gazillion browser tabs open, so we better get to the business at hand....

The Euro Beat - I've been mostly ignoring the travails of Keith Pelley & Co., so let's give them pride of place this morning.  News broke last week of their comeback plans, unfortunately including venues we had mistakenly assumed were plowed over:
Following the suspension of the season on March 8 due to the global Coronavirus pandemic, the European Tour will return to action initially behind closed doors in July
and run through until December. All tournaments will be subject to stringent safety and testing protocols set out in the Tour’s comprehensive Health Strategy which will continue to evolve, aligned with international Government guidance and health guidelines.

The first tournament in the ‘UK Swing’ is the Betfred British Masters hosted by Lee Westwood, which will be played at Close House, near Newcastle in the north east of England, from Wednesday July 22 to Saturday July 25 – a week earlier than originally scheduled. 
It will be followed by the English Open at the Marriott Forest of Arden and the English Championship at Marriott Hanbury Manor, before The Celtic Manor Resort in Newport hosts back-to-back European Tour tournaments – the Celtic Classic and the Wales Open.
It is a timely return to the south Wales resort as this year also marks the tenth anniversary of Europe’s dramatic victory against the United States in The 2010 Ryder Cup at the same venue. 
The UK Swing will then conclude with the UK Championship at The Belfry, another venue rich in Ryder Cup history, having played host to four contests with Europe triumphing in two (1985 and 2002), the US having won in 1993, with the 1989 match ending in a 14-14 tie.

Golf for Good, eh?  Kinda catchy, but before you fall in love with that slogan, Pelley has an alternative down below.

They've announced new dates for their Rolex series as well, including the Scottish Open (though not, it seems, the Irish).  Of course they're in a world of hurt, as they shouldn't anticipate any Americans coming over for the Scottish, when the R&A can't be bothered with holding that other UK-based event.

More troubling still might be the many reaction of the marquee Euro Tour members based in the U.S.  Will they feel sufficiently comfortable to travel to Europe?  If not, will they get a pass on their Euro Tour membership requirements and be permitted to play in the Ryder Cup in September?

Unlike their U.S. counterparts, they've opted for a cluster of events, to minimize the travel requirements.  Though back-to-back stroke play events at Celtic Manor violates many provisions of the Geneva Convention, though presumably they'll at least have better rain gear....  Anyone remember that fiasco?

There is, though, still this little matter to be addressed:
The tournaments depend on a lifting of government quarantine measures affecting travellers coming into the UK. There is confidence this will not prove a barrier to the tour, which has seen no play since early March. 
"In terms of the UK we are very encouraged and very optimistic that the hotels will be operational by the time we play at the end of July and that we will be able to get some dispensation for our players in terms of quarantine," Pelley added.

"And that is absolutely critical for us."
I led with the Euro's mostly because of this bit:
European Tour players set to wear microphones during 'UK Swing'
Viewers will hear conversations with caddies and fellow players, and European Tour
chief executive Keith Pelley believes it will become "the way of life" at future events. 
"Covid-19 allows you permission to try things a little bit differently," Pelley told BBC Sport. "I think you have to be as creative as you possibly can when you are playing behind closed doors. 
"It really comes down to how open you are, how creative you are and how your players want to embrace change. This is the time for us to do some things completely differently."
Let me just lay a marker down here, that this will be way less interesting than folks seem to think.  I'm a big fan of audio capture during events, but the vast majority of it is banal drivel.  

When this guy is the voice of reason, one needs to take careful notes:
Days after peeling back the curtain during a charity exhibition match, Phil Mickelson shared that he is open to wearing a microphone to give TV viewers additional insight during regular PGA Tour competition.

Speaking on the Dan Patrick Show, Mickelson admitted that he didn't expect the same level of banter during a typical Tour event with a seven-figure prize on the line, but he'd nonetheless be willing to broadcast his inside-the-ropes dialogue.

"I would be open to the idea because of how it's being received, and some of the insight and so forth," Mickelson said. "But you don't have the play between individuals. I had a partner, and Tom and I could talk back and forth. And maybe you could get some of that with the caddie, but having a partner is much more intimate and you have much better conversation."
Even Phil understates the disconnect.  He didn't just have a partner, he had an amateur partner (though I've been reliably informed that Mr. Brady has accomplishments in an unrelated field) in an event that Phil actually had reason to want to win (quite different from a Wednesday Pro-Am).

You'll capture some interesting player-caddie discussions, but there's no way this works with open microphones.  The audio will need to be carefully curated, and I'm unclear how much more will be picked up than is now available from the networks' microphones.

I'll have just a bit more on this later, when we get to Ponte Vedra Beach.  In our last bit, Pelley spent some time with The Scotsman's Martin Dempster, in which he reveals his Tour's new marketing slogan:
Keith Pelley, the European Tour chief executive, shot down talk of the coronavirus leaving the circuit on the brink of bankruptcy as he unveiled a new six-event UK Swing behind closed doors to restart a season that still aims to deliver 24 more tournaments.

“I think some of you might want to ask the question, is the European Tour bankrupt or running out of money, and I would say, absolutely not,” said Pelley as he broke his silence in a media teleconference on matters relating to the circuit apart from the Ryder Cup.
Not Bankrupt Yet™ is every bit as good as Live Under Par™...OK, I lied, obe more bit from Mr. Pelley:
Asked if he was confident about the UK Government’s 14-day quarantine for visitors to the UK being lifted in time for the scheduled restart, Pelley said: “I’m certainly encouraged and I’m certainly optimistic. We wouldn’t be announcing these events without having had significant dialogue with the UK government. They know all about the announcements. They are working feverishly with us.”
Feverishly?  Are you sure that's what you should go with right now?  I assume those government officials will immediately self-quarantine....

Deere Me -  All systems are go for a June 11th launch at Colonial, or so it seems from the brave talk out of Fortress Ponte Vedra Beach.  But a superficial scan of the horizon finds storm clouds aplenty:
Golfweek has learned that the PGA Tour’s John Deere Classic will not be held this year. 
The tournament was scheduled for July 9-12 at TPC Deere Run in Silvis, Illinois, and would have been the fifth event played in the Tour’s revamped schedule. The first four events, beginning May 21 at the Charles Schwab Challenge in Fort Worth, Texas, will not be allowing fans.
This was to be the first event with fans, held in a location less affected by the Chinese Virus than major metropolitan areas.
“We’ll probably do $10 million in charitable impact in a year that more than any I can remember will be critically important,” said Peterson, who added that the JDC gave $13.8 million to 543 charities last year. 
Financial considerations were part of the decision. The loss of pro-am income amounts to over $1 million, Peterson said, and all of the tournament’s corporate hospitality sponsors respectfully have said they didn’t feel comfortable participating this year. 
“We had one sponsor say that 90 percent of the guests they surveyed said they wouldn’t even come if they were invited,” Peterson said. “So, all that income is gone.”
Living Under Par isn't what it used to be™... Other reasons from a Bob Harig item:
"We have a small clubhouse, small parking lot. It's very difficult to get everything established from a social distancing standpoint, including locker rooms and everything else. Our title sponsor (John Deere) has been incredibly supportive, and during this pandemic they have been very cautious with their employees. So when all those things come into play, whatever version of the tournament we put on, we wouldn't be able to pull off with fans part of it. And that's a a money losing proposition. How much money can we afford to lose? How does our reserve fund look?"
Yeah, OK, if you throw that much at the wall, something will stick...  But perhaps this might be closer to the real issue?
Last month, John Deere announced it was laying off more than 260 employees from its Dubuque facility with 159 employees being placed on indefinite layoff beginning June 1.
Yeah, though I'm not sure that's Deere's sponsorship commitments would have survived much scrutiny during the good times.  Jay would be wise to not take their 2021 sponsorship for granted, nor any of the others as well.

So, what might they do with that open week?
The PGA Tour is trying to replace the John Deere for this year only and there is some consideration to having an event at TPC Sawgrass in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, which is at tour headquarters.
 So we could finish that Players' Championship?  Hideki is quite excited...

I've got really good news on that front as well.  I've checked The Chainsmokers tour schedule, and they seem wide open on that date.

The Tour Confidential panel takes on this issue, though the answers are comically unilluminating:

1. The PGA Tour’s first scheduled event that was to allow fans, the John Deere Classic, was canceled for this year. According to Golfweek, sources indicated that the title sponsor of the event didn’t want to risk having fans at the event in order to minimize the risk of a coronavirus outbreak. This follows news that the revised schedule of the European Tour will not allow fans for at least its first six events. Given the challenging economics around fan-less events, do you expect other tournaments will follow suit and pull the plug?
Josh Sens: I don’t think many will. Not all events make hay the same way. Some draw larger revenue streams from TV ratings and corporate sponsors and are less dependent on 
community turnout. The John Deere has more of the older school community event feel. The Tour’s other Illinois event – the BMW – is a different animal, and I think would be less likely to cancel under the same circumstances. That’s just a guess. I don’t know the numbers. But I’m not expecting a rash of cancellations due to a no-fans requirement. As for whether we might see other cancellations down the road due to health and safety concerns, that’s another question.
Sean Zak: I think the first four events will have such a great showing from players that events should be happy enough with the TV ratings alone. The fields are HUGE for the first two events, at least. Remember, we’ve got a major scheduled for basically two months from now. There will be a fun, valuable run-up to that even if there are no fans on the course.

Josh Berhow: I don’t think it will become a trend. The John Deere was in a tough spot. By being one of the first big-time sporting events to allow fans — if not the first — it was creating a model for everyone else in the sports world, not just the golf world. The whole event would be under a microscope, as commissioners and organizers would be watching like hawks to try to gain any learnings from what worked and what didn’t and how they could incorporate that into their own plans. That’s tremendous pressure. But why I don’t think this will continue as a trend is because we’re learning more and more each day about how to be safer and best practices. That’s going to evolve even more, and this period of learning will be crucial for others on the schedule to get their plans in place. 
Dylan Dethier: I think the three of you have it covered. In essence: Having fans on site soon is still optimistic, but possible — but non-Deere events will probably go on regardless.
I make fun of these guys for your amusement, but it's a stretch to expect them to know what will happen tomorrow....  To be fair, their answers aren't any worse than that which we've gotten from the CDC.  In fact, we should ask this panel abut the efficacy of face masks... Would be just as useful as what we're getting from our alleged experts.

But Josh ignores the issue of which event will now go first.  If that Deere week remains golf-less, that tees up The Memorial to break the ice.  As of last week, Ohio was still banning any gatherings of more than 100 people, and event organizers were skeptical that the event would go forward without fans. 

The guys also kicked around this thought of mic'ing players up:
4. Charles Barkley, one of the announcers for The Match: Champions for Charity, said this week on The Dan Patrick Show that should fans not be allowed to attend PGA Tour events, players should be mic’d up. Nice idea, but would players allow it?

Sens: Some wouldn’t. But I think enough would that viewers would end up getting the occasional interesting earful. I’m bullish on Barkley’s idea. 
Zak: I think most players wouldn’t. At least not on the weekend. It’s all good and fun until things get serious, and these players often put brand and clean-cut self over personality. That’s proven tough to change!

Berhow: I won’t say it’s never going to work, but it’s going to be really hard for it to work. If it’s every player, then it will be easier to make it happen. But I think the trouble comes with just making it a few players. Is it fair to guys like Rory and JT and Tiger, whom fans would love to be mic’d up, when a random Tour pro ranked somewhere in the 60s isn’t mic’d up and doesn’t have to worry about what he says and can just go out and play his game under the radar? Or if you do it with, say, the final pairing on a Sunday, to me that’s an unfair ask of a player who isn’t used to being in that situation in the first place. Winning is hard enough. Worrying about what you are saying — filtering your emotions while also being conscious of the fact that people want you to be entertaining — is not something these guys want to think about. 
Dethier: I think it could work the way it works in the NFL’s “Mic’d up” which, as I understand it, allows someone from the league office veto power in order to preserve player reputations, etc. So it wouldn’t be live mic’d up, but the broadcast could toss to some sound from earlier, which would be awesome.
Wow, see what happens when you ask an unfocused question?  They seem to think that 156 players will be wired and we'll get a live feed from every one.  Obviously this would take a vast production effort to screen the audio feeds, at the very time the networks have to minimize their footprint.  Yeah, it could be done remotely, but this is modestly interesting at best.  

Eamon Lynch plays the adult in the room, throwing cold water on this prospect:
The absence of mic’d competitors in tournaments isn’t because producers don’t want greater access. For all their garrulousness on social media, even younger Tour players maintain an old school mentality passed down from generations of Curtis Stranges and Raymond Floyds, who were as about as approachable as a piranha with toothache when they were working between the ropes. There is also a cost attached. “The Match II” was carefully stage-managed, with players held up along the way to ensure they were live at the right times. That won’t happen in tournaments with 156 guys in the field. Sure, you can stream a single group wired for sound, but for network broadcasts you’ll add the expense of a production staffer to monitor all the chatter for gems and a tape operator to cue it up (and armchair critics will still bemoan that it’s tape-delayed). 
Such costs are relatively small, but tell that to those held hostage to budgets. In return for player audio, a camera here or there might have to be sacrificed. And what is shunted aside to make way for this intimate new content? Live shots of actual play? Network commercials that pay for the rights fee? PGA Tour promos? Pedestrian interviews with check-signing CEOs sponsoring matters? Many of these elements chafe viewers — with good reason — but they hint at the many constituencies who would need to align to make this happen.
Hardly a make or break issue, as boring as these guys invariably are.

Shippy In Full -  In which we draft on Alan's mailbag feature, first on our theme of the day:
I know he’s almost essential for these TV events but has there ever been a reputed expert trash-talker that talks less trash than Tiger? -@FakePoulter 
This is similar to how folks tend to overrate exclusive courses because they’re caught up in the euphoria of finally getting to play them. The players who rave about Tiger’s needle are just so utterly thrilled that the great man deigned to throw some shade their way, 
No reporting on how uncomfortable the equipment is in the heat. 
however corny it may have been. The line about marking his ball with U.S. Open medals was funny, but why do I get the feeling Steinberg hired a team of writers to come up with it and Tiger spent a week practicing it in front of a mirror? 
As for wearing a mic in a TV spectacle, Tiger is clearly uncomfortable with the whole concept, and can you blame him? In the best of times he was an introvert and a grinder. Then he lived through the worst public shaming of the Internet age, and he later had both his mugshot and his private parts beamed around the world. His inner-self is a well-guarded fortress and he’s not willing to give that up just for a televised hit-and-giggle.
I actually think Alan is being charitable about that Ball-marking story, which was self-evidently pre-scripted...  Now, had he thrown an actual U.S. Open medal down and waited for Phil to react, we mighta had something there...But he's a boring guy, which I've been reliably informed is not actually a crime...
What’s more compelling from a viewing standpoint: The PGA Tour going to similar venues or the European Tour visiting places they haven’t been to in a long time? -@NDHickman 
It’s a win either way. I love when tournaments travel to new venues, even if they sometimes turn out to be less than ideal. Hey, at least we got to explore a new course in forensic detail. Kudos to the European Tour for cobbling together a compelling schedule under very difficult circumstances. But I’m also a sucker for history and tradition so it’s always satisfying to return to places like Colonial and Harbour Town.
Depends on the venue...  Most of us still sport psychological scars from The Belfry.
Does this year’s USGA tourney count as a major? If so, does this mean that
Hogan’s Hale American win will finally be recognized as a major win? -@bigredsbigworld 
I know we’re all sad about the lack of qualifying, but this year’s U.S. Sorta-Open is likely to have a stronger field than previous Opens, and it will certainly be better than the Masters field. Along with Oakmont, Winged Foot is the quintessential U.S. Open venue. So, no asterisk needed.
Funny enough, I just filed a big story for GOLF Magazine about how the game carried on during WWII, so I’m more versed in the Hale American Open than I’ve ever been. The tournament was cosponsored by the USGA, PGA of America and Chicago District Golf Association with the expressed purpose of raising money for the USO and Navy Relief Society. Bob Hope and Bing Crosby were given exemptions, as was the great Bobby Jones, 12 years after his retirement from competition. There was no 36-hole cut but there was a long-drive contest and a trick-shot exhibition. Hogan torched the defenseless Ridgemoor Country Club, in Chicago, with rounds of 72-62-69-68 to win by three; his four- round total of 271 bettered the existing U.S. Open record by ten shots. So, it doesn’t exactly sound like Hale America was an august national championship. But a record 1,528 men went through the qualifying process – Hope and Crosby both wound up declining their exemptions – and in victory Hogan was awarded the USGA gold medal traditionally given to U.S. Open champs. (His $1,000 winner’s check was paid in war bonds.) The Hale America was one of the biggest tournaments of the war-torn 1942 golf schedule…but I, personally, can’t consider it a real U.S. Open.
Qualifying is a lovely process, but barely matters in terms of the actual competition.  But amusing to see the concern over field strength, given the pass that Augusta gets.  Not to mention that 1860 Open Championship, which had an alarmingly weak field.
Alan, what’s the chance that in the next five years Phil ends up in the booth as a color commentator instead of playing tournaments full-time on a Champions Tour? He’s a natural and the networks would line up to sign him. Thanks. -@forearmshivers 
I’ve asked Phil about this directly and this is my take: he would *love* a platform and captive audience to demonstrate that he is the smartest guy in the room but has no appetite for committing to a full schedule of commentating, with all the travel, hotel rooms and staff meetings that entails. If you told the 55-year-old Phil he could commandeer the mic at a couple of majors and a few of other big-time events, he would do it in a heartbeat. But who wants to have to slog through a dozen or more B-list Tour events? Certainly not Mickelson. And, for the record, I don’t think he’ll ever play a full schedule on the Senior Tour, either.
Sounds right, though you can't know how Phil would hold up over the long term.... Stranger still, there are writers that would say the same about Tiger, most notably Alan's good buddy Mike Bamberger.
Tiger/Faldo vs Phil/Norman….at Medalist. Intriguing? Mic’d up and for charity, of course. -@BobbyTeeItUp 
This actually would be fascinating since Norman has so much beef with Tiger and a twisted history with Faldo. Given his need to hog the spotlight, I would expect Shark to chirp a ton and otherwise drive the competition crazy. Meanwhile, a mic’d Faldo would surely be mumbling all kinds of good material. Sign me up.
Good material?  How come none of that makes it over the CBS airwaves?  Was Sergio and Stephen Ames unavailable?
What 1960’s version of The Match would you like to see with Palmer and Nicklaus as the two pros? -@AirPallotti 
That’s easy: just add Bob Hope and Bing Crosby. Both were consummate entertainers and very good players.
You see how this hypothetical thing can quickly spin out of control.  If you had Hope and der Bingle, you'd be silly to allow Tiger and that other guy to bog things down.
What are you hearing, or what is your gut telling you, about the PGA at Harding Park? Is there any chance of fans? -@drwmrcs_gmcck

Over the last two weeks I’ve talked to folks at both Harding and the PGA of America. No one wants to go on record because the situation is still so fluid, but based on what I’ve been told, I now think the PGA will be played at Harding Park as scheduled but having fans on-site is doubtful to very doubtful. Sigh.
To me, Seth made a bad bet.  he could have had this event in late September, but got greedy and tried to salvage both his events.  he'll look especially short-sighted if The Memorial is played with spectators, but a few weeks later the PGA is played in a bubble.
Can you rank your favorite courses on the Monterey Peninsula? Also include Santa Cruz so Pasatiempo is included. -@DrewCecil 
I feel like I’ve done this a few times before but it’s always a fun exercise, and feelings can change over time, so: 
Pebble
CPC
Shore
Pasa
Dunes
Spy
P.G Muni
Preserve
Poppy
Black Horse
Bayo
Monterey Pines
  Fair enough, though Pebble over Cypress is a minority view...
Who are all the hangers-on at PGA and LPGA events (on the range, putting greens, etc.), and will the pros miss them when social distancing is in effect? -@David_Troyan 
Agents, swing coaches, short-game coaches, equipment reps, trainers, personal assistants, nannies. Some players (cough, cough Bryson) will be lost without the large entourages, others are going to revel in the new peacefulness of the range and practice green. It’s certainly going to be different.
A herd that's needed a culling for quite some time...
What happened to Nick Watney? Keegan Bradley? -@theblackwhip 
Golf is hard.
True that.  And you know what's even harder than golf?  Putting.
Why wouldn’t a mid-level guy on the PGA want to be mic’d up to raise his profile and get more TV time? Maybe a Rory wouldn’t want it, but those guys between 30-100 on the OWGR should be eager to get in the mix. It would highlight new guys and give us inside-the-ropes coverage. -@fancyfeet4 
Totally agree. Pre-Covid, I saw a tweet that I still think about: some random golf fan said he was heading to his first Tour event and he was more excited to follow Joel Dahmen and Max Homa than any of the superstars because he felt like he knew and was more invested in Max and Joel through of the magic of Twitter. Same principle applies here ⁠— mic’ing players, so we can better understand how they play the game as well as who they are, is a fabulous way for players to connect with fans (and build their brand). The average Tour player would be crazy to pass up the opportunity.
I feel better already, knowing that I live in a world where Joel Dahmen has groupies.

Lastly, Alan has good, sound advice for this reader:
I just moved into a new house on the 4th hole of a golf course is it wrong for me to tee it up 1st day while my girlfriend moves all the furniture? -@theBrixtonSaint 
This is a very, very delicate situation. I would recommend you play no more than 36 holes.
Still More Alan -  A smarter man than I would save this for later, but Shipnuck has an epic rant that you'll enjoy:
Wuss Happening: Today’s game has gone soft in many ways
Do tell:
I hate to be the one to break it to you, but golf is going soft. Quite literally, as my plush FootJoy socks now come emblazoned with an L and an R, lest I can’t figure it out on my own. The evidence is elsewhere in my golfing life: hybrids instead of long-irons; a laser to gauge yardages so I no longer have to schlep to a sprinkler head; balls that fly forever but refuse to be scuffed, no matter how thin I catch my 9-iron; performance fabrics to spare me my own sweat. An 18-hole slog from the tips was the old standard, carrying my bag every step of the way. Now even the ruling bodies are encouraging me to tee it forward and just play nine.
Anything else?
Given how soft players have become, it’s surprising that Charmin isn’t the official sponsor of the PGA Tour. At this year’s Wells Fargo Championship, Bob Estes withdrew
due to allergies. I like Estes and don’t want to minimize his suffering, but Ray Floyd would’ve cut off his nose with a 1-iron before W/D’ing due to the sniffles. Similarly, do you think Ben F’ing Hogan would’ve worn shorts during practice rounds? Hubert Green won the 1977 U.S. Open playing through a death threat, and Jack Nicklaus spent years being heckled as Fat Jack by Arnie’s Army, but now every noisy fan is in danger of getting tossed by a touchy-feely Tour pro. They are even bigger snowflakes on Twitter: Billy Horschel and Ian Poulter each has more blocks than Patrick Ewing.
But wait, this is gonna leave a mark, on Rickie of course:
Warriors from the days of yore were masters of gamesmanship who often played in stony silence. Now, the players vacation together and post cutesy photos about it on social media. Nick Faldo won the Claret Jug three times but refused to take so much as one drink out of it, so deep was his reverence. There isn’t an important trophy Rickie Fowler hasn’t imbibed from, even if none of them are his. The chumminess plays out between the ropes: there is currently an epidemic on Tour of “backstopping,” whereby players don’t mark their ball on the green if it’s in a spot that might help slow down a competitor’s ensuing, misplayed shot. I’m stymied by the very thought of it.
Didn't you hear, Alan?  Shack says the ladies solved the backstopping thing for us...  Yeah, I don't buy it, either.

Good fun, and you can see I went a little crazy with the excerpting....

Ever Gracious - Here's how Shack frames this inevitable walk-back:
Korn Ferry WD: Vijay Reads The Room
In the end, Vijay Singh drew heat for entering an event he will not play.

A month after signing up for the Korn Ferry Tour’s season reopening tournament, Singh has withdrawn from field, the PGA Tour confirmed to Golf Digest Sunday.
Maybe Geoff, but caring what others think hasn't been in Vijay's bag all this time, so I think it's far more likely that the Tour advised him that his presence was not helpful.

Or, yanno, he did the math:
Though Singh did pull out voluntarily, there was a chance, according to the KFT priority rankings, he wouldn’t have ultimately qualified for the event, which begins on June 11 at TPC Sawgrass’ Dye’s Valley Course in Ponte Vedra Beach.
I'm guessing voluntarily in the same manner in which DJ voluntarily had a jet-ski accident.... But thanks for going away, Veej.  Can we make this a permanent thing?

I'll leave you on that grace note, and we'll catch up down the road.  Lots of browser tabs still open, so don't be a stranger.