Any questions?
If we fire up the Wayback Machine to January of 2025, I would have had two criticisms of Scottie Scheffler's game and record, although that might not be quite the word. My first demerit would be that, despite his gaudy 2024 win total, exactly one of those wins was against a full field (that being the Players Championship). The other slight nick would have been to note that he'd only won one of the four majors (and, to continue harping on field size), it was the one with the tiny field (though, admittedly, he'd won it twice).
So, what does he do despite the slow start to his season due to that kitchen injury? I blink and suddenly he'll be going for immortality at Shinnecock. OK, I'm going to go way out on a limb and predict that he'll get his U.S. Open before Phil.... I know, it's a gift.
Geoff frames his coverage on the winner's failure to complete the Calamity Slam:
Hopes for a Calamity Slam died Sunday when Scottie Scheffler yanked a 14-footer at Royal Portrush’s vaunted one-shotter, ending an unfathomable run of birdies on the 236-yarder.And that amounted to the Ulster drama Sunday when Scheffler captured The 153rd Open Championship for the first time to go with three majors. The 29-year-old is one U.S. Open win away from becoming the seventh holder of the career Grand Slam.The final margin of victory of four strokes over Harris English was nearly a carbon copy of this year’s PGA Championship, where the former Georgia star tied for second, five behind Scheffler.Five strokes back in third place was American Chris Gotterup, the recent Genesis Scottish Open winner playing in his first Open Championship and fourth major.Scheffler’s dominance means the last three Champion Golfers of the Year are from America (Brian Harman and Xander Schauffele).Of the 13 players finishing T10 or better in The 153rd, eight were Americans.
A bit surprised by Geoff's xenophobia, although technically the Yanks are the foreigners in this event. I guess we'll just chalk it up to Geoff being depressed at absence of meaningful golf for the next eight months. I know it's the most depressing day in golf to your humble blogger, only slightly mitigated by it being a Ryder Cup year.
And here's Geoff's take on Scottie's mid-round walkabout:
A brief hiccup in the par-4 eighth’s fairway bunker led to his only double bogey of the week and a seven-stroke lead briefly reduced to five. A bounce-back birdie at the ninth immediately turned Sunday into a coronation. Scheffler had converted ten straight 54-hole leads. Or eleven straight if Hero World Challenge wins are your thing. But that 20-player silly season event certainly does not come with a well-deserved “Champion Golfer Of The Year” tag, a Claret Jug or a $3.1 million check.
It was a wee bit more dramatic than that, methinks. Scottie had made a mess of the Par-5 seventh as well, though bailed himself out by making a long par putt. He looked like the rest of us when we lose our will to live, then bounced back on the ninth and managed his way home.
More Calamity-blogging:
Scheffler separated himself from the field in too many ways to count, but six birdies in 16 par-3 chances seems especially brilliant given the difficulty of Portrush’s difficult one-shotters. He led the field with a 37.5% birdie conversion rate on the par-3’s. And not only did he avoid Calamity, he slayed the monstrous 236-yard 16th. The hole where past greats have intentionally played away from the green in fear of coming up short.
- 3 feet 5 inches (Birdie)
- 17 feet 5 inches (Birdie)
- 14 feet 4 inches (Birdie)
- 14 feet 4 inches (Par)
About that lowly par. Scottie, what went wrong?“I was fortunate to be able to enjoy the walk with a putter versus having to go down there into the ravine and try to hit a wedge out,” he said of his week on the 16th. “I'm very grateful for the tee shots this week, but like you said, disappointed with a par today.”He was smiling (in case you hadn’t guessed).Initial impression of the hole?“The first day we played it, it was raining and blowing in out of the left, and I smoked a 3-wood to 30 feet, and I thought it was a pretty amazing shot,” Scheffler said after hoisting the Jug. “And then I was playing against Sam Burns in a practice round, and he hit 3-wood to about 25 feet and made it. I was like, shoot, just hit a great shot and I lost this hole still.”
Maybe he handled it well because he took time to smell the roses:
Scheffler’s secret to success came down to his affinity for a hole that induces heartburn in most.“It's one of the coolest views that I've seen in the game of golf, to be honest with you,” he said. “Teddy [Scott] and I were standing there, I think it was on Friday, we were kind of looking out. It was a day in which you had a bunch of rain and there was a rainbow on the other side and you're looking out over the golf course on the right, and you've got the huge bluffs by the ocean and it's just mounds and hills, and the town is in the distance. It's a really, really cool hole.”
Or, maybe he handled it well because he's the best ball-striker of the day? Just a thought.
Shall we dive into the Tour Confidential roundtable, where you'll not be shocked at the silly question with which they lead:
Scottie Scheffler dominated at Royal Portrush, finishing 17 under par and winning by four in what was one of the most anticlimactic major Sundays in recent memory. Scheffler, at age 29, now has four major titles, and how he lapped the competition is reminiscent of Tiger Woods’ prime. Is it premature to wonder if Woods’ 15 major titles are in reach? If so, when does that conversation need to start?Jessica Marksbury: Tiger showed us that Jack’s major title was actually achievable — and you could argue that, given the many years of injury Tiger endured during his prime, he really should have won more than 15. But watching Scottie, it’s hard not to imagine him eclipsing Tiger — and maybe even Jack. I know there’s some recency bias at play, and there’s a lot that needs to happen, of course, to bring that all to fruition. Scottie has to avoid serious injury and somehow maintain this outrageously high level of play for the next decade-plus. But man, it sure does seem possible right here, right now.Josh Sens: Tiger had twice as many majors by 29, but Scheffler has a superpower that Tiger lacked at that age: he seems entirely at peace with himself. Not too early to start a harmless water-cooler conversation. Assuming he stays healthy and yip-free, Scheffler’s got a shot at it, with another decade or so of golf prime ahead of him. The fact that he’s not the type of guy who will be paying attention to any of our water-cooler chatter will only help his chances more.Josh Schrock: Scottie has a shot at it, but I think we might be discounting how many majors that is, given the current depth in men’s golf. I think four or five is a ton. For Scottie to win 11 more against this group would require an unbelievable level of sustained excellence and injury luck. It’s possible, but it’s still a massive ask, even for the guy who is the best player since Tiger.Zephyr Melton: Scottie may be on a Tiger-like run, but 15 majors is too high a total to reach in the current era. I could see Scottie threatening double digits, but that feels like his ceiling.
Yeah, it's just human nature, no? A man wins his fourth major and we can't help but turn our minds to his sixteenth major, right? Seriously, what's wrong with these folks and how does Jess Marksbury keep her job? Some recency bias?
It's fair to say that Scottie has been playing at a Tiger-like level, but it's quite extraordinary to just concede that he can keep doing that for another decade or more..... Dare we see how she handles the inevitable follow-up?
Scheffler has won his four majors in four years, but other pros have gone on heaters before, too. Most recently, Brooks Koepka won four in three years; Jordan Spieth won three in three years; and Rory McIlroy won four in four years. What makes you think Scheffler will or won’t taper off like this group?Marksbury: Scottie seems grounded in so many valuable ways: faith, family, lifestyle, that there doesn’t appear to be anything in his way. He’s just so steady.Sens: Agreed, Jess. Spieth seems similarly at peace with his life, but his game was never as well-rounded as Scheffler’s. And unlike Koepka and McIlroy, Scheffler does not appear to have any let-up week to week. And that seems to stem from his life outside of golf. He knows that golf matters, but he also understands it only matters so much.Schrock: You don’t need to look further than his pre-tournament press conference. He loves golf, competing, and the work required to be great. But the fact that he isn’t defined by his golf allows him to do what he’s doing. Rory once talked about how he used to think less of himself as a person if he played a bad round. His golf defined his existence. That Scottie clearly puts his family and faith ahead of golf should give him a good shot at maintaining a high level of play. Longevity is something that isn’t talked about enough; it’s the impressive thing about Rory. Scottie is far, far ahead of everyone right now and has been for two years. I’ll be interested to see how long he can continue this.Melton: As my colleagues mentioned above, Scottie’s mindset is what sets him apart from his competitors, and that’s something that can’t be learned. In terms of on-course play, Scottie’s combination of course-management discipline and distance control with his irons is a deadly combo; it’s why when he’s playing well, it looks so boring. When you’re hitting to the correct spots with the correct numbers and rolling in a few putts, you become tough to beat.
This is the more interesting question, as the three guys cited are interesting comparisons. To me it's pretty clear that Scheffler is the more complete player than Koepka or Spieth, although there's not shortage of hindsight in the comment. In the moment, each of those two appeared to have unlimited upside, the subsequent arc of their careers coming as quite the surprise.
But, in the moment, whose future career would have appeared to be brighter, Rory in August 2014 or Scottie today? That to me should be the object lesson for Jess Marksbury and every other golf fan, the fact that the ability to sustain that level of performance is the indicator of greatness, but we all get fooled in the short term. We couldn't see ahead with Rory, Jordan and Brooksie, yet we think we can with Scottie. Curious that.
Not that I don't agree with them about Scottie being perhaps more grounded. Tiger was able to sustain his greatness through his blinding ambition. Could Scottie accomplish the same by refusing to care too much about it? I have no clue, but what a fascinating thing it'll be to watch.
Shall we talk some Rory? Here's a sample of the reactions:
Sorry, but what are the other victory laps against which this one would be judged?
And this:
British Open 2025: At Royal Portrush, it was Scottie Scheffler’s Open, but Rory McIlroy’s week
This Open Championship belongs to Scottie Scheffler. His performance was too commanding, too complete to suggest otherwise. Four masterful rounds delivered the links title that had been conspicuously absent from a résumé lacking little else—four rounds that raise serious questions about whether golf is witnessing generational excellence or something approaching all-time greatness. Yet somehow, Scheffler felt almost secondary to a man who finished seven shots behind.That statement sounds absurd until you consider what unfolded at Royal Portrush this week. McIlroy has long been golf's most beloved figure, and that affection always intensifies during the Open Championship. But what manifested here was more than support. Fans packed 10-deep around most holes, scrambling over dunes and through fescue, many unable to see McIlroy but desperate simply to be close enough to shout his name. In the hospitality suites, patrons abandoned their tables the moment he appeared, pressing faces against plexiglass windows like children at an aquarium. Parents hoisted kids onto shoulders for fleeting glimpses. Bleachers filled an hour before his arrival, only to empty the instant he moved on to the next hole.The scenes grew increasingly surreal. A teenager with a bleached buzz cut—"The Open" styled into the back of his head—ducked under the ropes at the second hole, phone extended for a selfie before marshals swept him away. At one point, television cameras captured a man swimming in the frigid Irish Sea, waving a flagstick topped with an Open flag in one hand and brandishing a yellow "GO RORY!" sign in the other.
Then there were the sounds. Golf tournaments typically produce predictable audio—polite applause following good shots, disappointed murmurs after poor ones, the familiar rhythm of gallery appreciation. This was something else entirely. This sounded like a concert or football match: nonstop chants, serenades of McIlroy's name, a celebration that seemed barely concerned with the actual competition unfolding. This was a four-day festival of worship, punctuated by moments of pure sporting theater.Saturday provided the crescendo. McIlroy, seven shots back and needing magic, delivered exactly that: birdies on three of his first four holes, the kind of explosive start that has defined his career. The sounds that followed were deafening, lasting, primal—the type that cannot be manufactured or conjured, erupting purely from instinct and emotion. The defining moment came when McIlroy's eagle putt crawled 56 agonizing feet across the green before disappearing into the cup. The eruption that followed shook the ground, a sonic boom of pure joy that seemed to suspend time itself. After his 66, McIlroy called Saturday the loudest round he could remember and cited that eagle—and the thunderous response it generated—as one of the coolest moments of his career. This from someone who had slipped on the green jacket just months earlier.
Sorry for that long excerpt, but let me push my luck by seeing how you react to this bit, especially the ending:
It sounds counterintuitive, but it's a phenomenon experienced frequently by elite athletes—particularly Olympians who spend lifetimes working toward something that arrives only once every four years. Upon reaching the summit, they find themselves adrift with nowhere left to climb. There's also been his mounting frustration with his position in the game and the scrutiny that accompanies it. He's occupied this fishbowl existence his entire adult life, carrying a burden most of us can't fathom. Though there have been slip-ups and shortcomings, the throughline of his career has been grace. When that grace wasn't reciprocated—when criticism felt unfair or harsh—his reactions at Quail Hollow and Oakmont became understandable, if not admirable.
Admirable? We're now rationalizing hissy fits? Joel (Beall, the author), can you not see the throughline from here to, say, Wyndham Clark?
Hard to skip the TC panel, although they seem to intentionally frame it in the oddest manner possible:
The last time the Open was at Royal Portrush, Rory McIlroy fizzled in a disappointing homecoming and missed the cut. This time, he seemed rejuvenated, produced Tiger-like galleries, and finished T7. Will this week be remembered for Scottie’s first Claret Jug or Rory’s proper return to Northern Ireland?Marksbury: Great to see Rory’s redemption here at Portrush, and it probably stung a bit less toMelton: It will certainly be meaningful for Rory on a personal level, but in the grand scheme of things, few casual fans will remember much from his performance this week. It was a feel-good story, sure, but Scottie claiming the Claret Jug is the only thing that matters. have such a deficit to make up, given Scottie’s lead. This major will definitely be remembered for Scottie’s first Open win, but there was no doubting who the crowd favorite was this week, and that was Rory.Sens: Rory McIlroy is a career Grand Slam winner and a future Hall of Famer. We shouldn’t be giving him participation prizes and I doubt he’d be satisfied with them anyway. This week was about Scheffler winning another major. Rory having a nice showing doesn’t count as much of a conversation piece.Schrock: I’m going to go ahead and zag here. I don’t think it’s a participation prize to say that Rory’s week was much better and more meaningful than six years ago. Justin Leonard spoke about the burden for Rory having to play in front of his home country with everyone trying to will him over the line. This was Scottie’s major, but he will win more, and I think the lasting image from the Open’s Portrush return will be Rory fist-pumping as he made eagle on Saturday to send the crowd into a fit of delirium.
Melton: It will certainly be meaningful for Rory on a personal level, but in the grand scheme of things, few casual fans will remember much from his performance this week. It was a feel-good story, sure, but Scottie claiming the Claret Jug is the only thing that matters.
I think the Rory stuff was great, heart-warming and something of a vindication after that bizarre Thursday in 2019. That said, it comes after a bizarre interregnum where Rory seemed to intentionally squander so much of the goodwill he had accumulated, at a time when he should have been fat, dumb and happy.
But this was also an important competitive week for Rory, and it's hard to ignore the disappointments in that regard. His game was as it ever was, with that same combination of highlights and lowlights evident on the back nine at Augusta. A great talent, but one prone to frequent large misses.
This is no doubt true:
Bryson DeChambeau climbs into top 10 at British Open, all but locking up Ryder Cup spot
So, what was the deal with Thursday? Kinda stealing Rory's signature move there, but those last three rounds he showed an ability to stay with Scottie, though not at all the same thing when you shoot 64 on Sunday from the middle of the pack.
This to me is quite the bizarre take:
During final round coverage on NBC, analyst Kevin Kisner had an interesting take on the Clark and Oakmont debacle, which resulted in numerous golf personalities on social media questioning his comments."I'm not sure anybody in the situation handled it properly," Kisner said on the broadcast. "Wyndham probably could have nipped that in the bud with an earlier, or justifiable, statement, but locker rooms are supposed to be sacred. Not sure how that picture got out, USGA can help with that. I think if everyone just sat at a table face to face, that situation could go away pretty quickly."His comments make it seem as if he's pointing a finger at the USGA for the photo getting out. No Laying Up's Tron Carter is who initially posted the photo of damage on social media. After Kisner's comments, numerous people flooded social media to post about the situation.
We love our Golfers Behaving Badly stories, but I actually have sympathy for the guys that fight a little anger out there. But this takes me back to the era of Tim Finchem, Nurse Ratched for those who were there with us, whereby it's the job of the adults to protect the children from the consequences of their actions.
Think Clark has developed an expectation that he'll be protected?
Clark finished T-4 at the British Open and spoke with media Sunday after declining to talk Saturday."Yeah, so obviously I feel terrible with what happened. I'm doing anything I can to try to remedy the situation. We're trying to keep it private between Oakmont, myself and the USGA. I'm just happy we have a pathway moving forward, and like you said, I'm hoping we can get past this and move on and hope there's no ill-will towards me and Oakmont."Like you said, I'm just trying to get past it. I want the best for Oakmont, the USGA and myself. Like I said, I'm very sorry for what I did and feel terrible, and hopefully in a few months we're past this, and it's something of the past."
Yes, we're all hoping we can get past Wyndham, though it would be easier if he could just, yanno, stop destroying shit.... But by all means find a path forward, just like the path forward from the PGA that led to...well, the need for another path forward. Shockingly, Golf Twitter had thoughts.
A great week for the people of Northern Ireland and a worthy champion. Not too shabby.
Elsie and John arrive today, with golf planned for Tuesday and Wednesday. I'll be back, though I suspect not tomorrow. Cheers.